Clinton Would Have Saved Social Security If Not for Ken Starr

CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | APRIL 14, 2005 | NOEL SHEPPARD

[bad company]

Great read. Almost as good as the responses. If it gets too slow this weekend, I'll have to bump this up a few times.

[litehaus]

How'd ya spell r e v i s i o n i s t?

[Lazamataz]

Or, did Social Security become financially solvent the very moment Al Gore lost in 2000?

And the homeless came back out, too.

[CHARLITE]

The "pile of rubbish" is exactly what Noel Sheppard, the author of the piece, is exposing. He is critiqueing the article published in the S.F. Chronicle, which is the revisionist version.

"The most recent such revelation suggests that Mr. Clinton would have reformed Social Security in his second term if he had not been distracted by those dastardly and unnecessary impeachment proceedings. Such are the proclamations in a San Francisco Chronicle front-page story entitled "Social Security rehab died first under Clinton.”

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/04/11/MNGKIC697J1.DTL

Sheppard then goes on to mock and ridicule the liberal female writer's desperate attempt to exonerate Clinton for not having kept his weak, non-substantial campaign and grandstanding promises to reform Social Security.

From your posted comment, I got the impression that you thought that it was the writer of the article (Noel Sheppard) who is the revisionist. He's not. It's the author of the S.F. Chronicle article who is.