This seems like your own inventive perspective of what she was doing. Do you really think that she took off for Iraq to aid "terrorists" and to hurt American soldiers? I think you're misinformed about the lengths to which sadists will go to satisfy themselves. There is plenty she could do to aid terrorists and harm American soldiers from the homeland.
Rather, the much more probable reason she was there was that she felt compelled to aid the "collateral damage" victims of our bombing campaigns. She could, I imagine, aid somewhat effectively in that respect. I'm not sure how effectively she could aid the "terrorist" cause in Iraq or harm Americans unless she was actively assisting the insurgency. Counting and comforting the maimed can hardly qualify.
You ARE speaking of "Marla Ruzicka" correct?
WHY don't you bother looking up things she said HERSELF.
YES, by her own admission she was there to try and disrupt the American war effort.
You obviously are either unaware of that, or PURPOSEFULLY being dishonest.
Considering your post and tone, I'd say it's the LATTER.
Crew, Meet "Legal Conservative".
He believes that Marla Ruzicka was in Iraq "for the children" (post 89).
Marla Ruzicka, the terrorist sympathiser who ended up dead due to her symptathies.
Don't get near an open flame. Methane is very flammable.
what the hell are you talking about?
bombing campaigns? We havent had anything like that in nearly 2 freakin years in Iraq!!! Can I have some of the crack you are smoking please?
"Rather, the much more probable reason she was there was that she felt compelled to aid the "collateral damage" victims of our bombing campaigns."
Supply proof of bombing campaigns by US troops.
the ONLY difference between this POS and that Flat Dumb and Stooopid rachel corry is where they got killed...