Skip to comments.
UN Discovers Human Remains in Kosovo Cave ("Non-Albanians" mass grave after NATO's takeover)
scotsman.com ^
| Mon 18 Apr 2005
| "PA"
Posted on 04/18/2005 8:22:35 AM PDT by Destro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: tfecw
He's free to ping you since you've taken part in this discussion and made serious accusations with NO PROOF. Do you know the "eye witnesses"? Many "eye witnesses" in the Balkans are those coached before testifying, and many have been caught in lies and inconsistencies.
21
posted on
04/18/2005 8:50:38 AM PDT
by
joan
To: tfecw; Pilsner
If I have to chose a side to help I will chose the side not linked with al-Qaeda and the heroin trade. Thank you.
22
posted on
04/18/2005 8:53:53 AM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: tfecw
What part of "NO personal abuse" don't you understand?
And sorry if your words do sound like Ward Churchill, but that's not my fault.
23
posted on
04/18/2005 8:55:43 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: Destro
As the years go by, more and more of the "Clinton legacy" comes to light. It can't stay hidden forever.
24
posted on
04/18/2005 8:56:08 AM PDT
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: tfecw
Another stupid statement.
To: tfecw
That's just your way of saying you have no evidence. You are just a big sucker for propaganda. The Bosnian Muslims have been caught in lie after lie after lie, and even UN soldiers have written and testified that they staged attacks.
After UN General Lewis MacKenzie said Muslims mentioned them staging attacks, they said he was a rapist of multiple Bosnian Muslim women. However, they never named the women, and said that the women were killed. How convenient. They didn't have to have any proof of their accusations.
The Bosnian government even convicted a Serb for murdering 2 Muslim brothers, who were discovered alive, after the war, by the Serb's uncle. The brothers had been in the Bosnian government army in Sarajevo, yet no Bosnian Muslim stepped forward to say they were living, not dead. That's what those people are - they will allow Serbs to be wrongly convicted and left rotting in jail. They have no real sense of truth or justice. They've always been tools of foreign countries and empires.
26
posted on
04/18/2005 8:57:48 AM PDT
by
joan
To: FormerLib
I'm sorry if your words made you sound like and Idiotic Ass, but it's not my fault.
27
posted on
04/18/2005 8:58:15 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: joan
It doesn't matter, anything i say you'll ask for more evidence.Yeah, how dare you ask for proof when the propaganda is being flung?
28
posted on
04/18/2005 8:58:32 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: tfecw
Still confused about the "NO personal abuse" concept, I see.
29
posted on
04/18/2005 8:59:21 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
To: joan
As someone pointed out there are no good guys. This notion to jump on the Serbian band wagon because they are either:
A Christians,
B not Muslim,
C No supported by the Clinton admin or UN, hence the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
It's all crap. The Serbians are covered in blood just as much as the other factions. Where's your evidence? You point out some stories, and i can do the same. Where does that gets us? No where. Have fun with the idea the Serbs where all around good guys.
31
posted on
04/18/2005 9:03:05 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
To: tfecw; joan
The Serbians are covered in blood just as much as the other factions.So why are you here giving lip service to Clinton's policy of only bombing the Serbs in support of the Muslims?
33
posted on
04/18/2005 9:09:29 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: oso blanco
Thanks to Sandy Berger's little visit to the archives, we'll never know what Clinton knew nor when he knew it.
34
posted on
04/18/2005 9:11:16 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: FormerLib
See the above post on your words in this one.
You've got me i'm a clinton spy. I'm one of the many plants here to insure his lies and misinformation are forever remembered.
Grow up. You want to forget the Serb's participation in the whole deal then go ahead. But your right we should have bombed them both. Or maybe we should have let them fight it out. Or just perhaps we should have let the Serbians finished cleaning out their country. It is theirs after all, and besides they wouldn't have the racial tension they have now right?
35
posted on
04/18/2005 9:13:00 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: tfecw
I figured it out through seeing and catching thousands of details, and seeing how the media deliberately went out of its way to lie: to blame Serbs for crimes that did not exist or were done by others.
They were perfectly slanted against the Serbs because they never accused the non-Serbs for crimes that were found not to happen.
Then you have the census results in Croatia which shows the Serb population in 2001 is down to less than 4.5% from over 12.2% before the war. Further, many Serbs are counted as being residents of Croatia even though they live in camps in Serbia and only simply registered with Croatia.
Bosnia refused to do a census in recent years despite all the other countries in the area: Slovenia, Croatia, Albania, Serbia, etc. doing one. Nonetheless figures show and increase in the percentage of Bosnian Muslims. Wouldn't genocide of one faction over another show the genocided group as shrinking percentage-wise? Same with Kosovo - the numbers of Albanians in Kosovo did not drop after the war vs. before the war, and their percentage rose.
36
posted on
04/18/2005 9:16:28 AM PDT
by
joan
To: FormerLib; tfecw
tfecw: The Serbians are covered in blood just as much as the other factions.
FormerLib: So why are you here giving lip service to Clinton's policy of only bombing the Serbs in support of the Muslims
Oh Snap! High five, FormerLib! You just served, tfecw. What?
37
posted on
04/18/2005 9:16:33 AM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: tfecw
Or just perhaps we should have let the Serbians finished cleaning out their country.Try getting your facts right, huh? Serbia was the most multi-ethnic region of the Former Yugoslavia and it remains so today while Kosovo had been purged of virtually all non-Albanians.
38
posted on
04/18/2005 9:19:14 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: tfecw; FormerLib
These "non-Albanians" were killed AFTER the war when Kosovo was under NATO's supposed protection. So your points are moot.
39
posted on
04/18/2005 9:20:23 AM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson