Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Made-up massacre, 'Jenin Massacre' still exists only in the minds of the uninformed
DC Examiner ^ | April 17, 2005 | Joel Mowbray

Posted on 04/18/2005 7:45:10 PM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John

Facts are stubborn things - except when you create your own.

When I was asked about the "Jenin Massacre" by a Muslim student during an event at Norfolk's Old Dominion this week, it became clear we were coming from two very different perspectives: reality vs. mythology.

There was no "Jenin Massacre." Period. The only "massacre" that took place at Jenin was that of the truth.

Palestinians, long masters of media manipulation, went by the hundreds to foreign media - whom Israel kept outside of the armed conflict - to claim that over 500 innocents had been slaughtered. The man at the front of the prevarication parade was longtime Arafat sidekick Saeb Erekat.

The international media was in a tizzy, and most of the world fell for the lie. Only after the smoke had cleared and outsiders allowed in did the truth come out.

Fifty-six Palestinians had died, but 47 of them were armed. The civilian casualties were at a minimum because Israeli soldiers went door-to-door and put their own lives at risk. Their caution cost 23 young Israelis their lives.

Even the United Nations - which had initially condemned the "massacre" - eventually determined that there had been no massacre. Yet to this day, Jenin is a rallying cry for Muslims around the world, particularly on college campuses in the United States. And Old Dominion is no different.

When I explained that there had been no massacre, some of the Muslim students expressed palpable disbelief, others snickered.

The student who asked the question did engage me in conversation afterward, and it was readily apparent that he is bright, even hyper-articulate. He could run circles around two-thirds of the successful people inside the Beltway. Headed for law school in the fall, he seems destined to be a leader.

How could someone so obviously intelligent swallow whole such a widely-discredited fabrication? Has he intellectually cocooned himself and refused to read anything counter to his worldview? Maybe the better question is: Has any professor or advisor attempted to challenge his views, forcing him to rethink what he believes?

Youth lends itself to stridency and naïveté, (my note, I believe the prior word is naiveness) making campuses fertile fields for hatemongers and paranoia peddlers, providing an ideal home to delusional Muslim mythology. And political correctness has served as an accomplice.

With academia's moral relativism, no culture or belief system (aside from that of conservatives) can, or is allowed to, be criticized. Muslim students are encouraged to hold "different" views, even if they differ from established fact. Telling them otherwise can be a terminal mistake. Just ask Thomas Klocek.

After 14 years of continuous service as a part-time adjunct professor, DePaul University in Chicago indefinitely suspended Klocek without pay based on a single incident. His crime? He was accused of insulting Muslim students. Explaining the suspension, Dean Susanne Dumbleton wrote in a letter to the school paper that Klocek had "demean[ed] the ideas" and "freedom" of the Muslim students and "dishonored" their "perspective."

DePaul counts among its faculty a Holocaust denier and a well-known Islamist, yet both are still gainfully employed. Neither made the mistake of insulting Muslim students.

Academia's abdication of its responsibility means that otherwise bright and capable Muslim students will not be afforded the opportunity - as many of us have been blessed to have - to re-evaluate and reassess their belief systems. This is particularly ominous if the current Muslim leadership is any indication of what the future holds.

As the twin towers were burning on Sept. 11, 2001, Salam al-Marayati, executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, theorized that the culprit was-who else - the Jews. On a Los Angeles radio show, he said, "If we're going to look at suspects, we should look to the groups that benefit the most from these kinds of incidents, and I think we should put the state of Israel on the suspect list."

He had no historical or factual basis to support his hypothesis. Islamic terrorism had been on the rise for years at that point, and the Palestinian intifada had already showcased almost a year of nonstop Islamic terrorism, yet al-Mariyati instead chose to hatch a crackpot conspiracy theory - one that still is very much alive in mosques across America.

The most common myth perpetuated by America's Muslim leaders - and sadly, much of the Left - is that Israel is the source of the world's problems.

Wahhabism started in Saudi Arabia two centuries before the creation of the Jewish state, and the granddaddy of all modern-day terrorists, Muslim Brotherhood, also got the jump on Israel, launching more than two decades earlier. Yet the doctrine of the Muslim leadership is that creating a Palestinian state will eliminate terrorism.

But you can't fight their fiction with facts. Because to them, their fiction is fact. The saddest fact, though, is that academia's moral relativism dictates that there is no distinction.

Joel Mowbray is the author of "Dangerous Diplomacy: How the State Department Threatens America's Security."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Illinois; US: New York; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: academia; arablies; arbalies; axisofevil; catholic; catholiccolleges; catholiclist; catholicuniversities; cino; depaul; depaulu; depauluniversity; dhimmi; dhimmitude; dumbleton; idf; islam; israel; jenin; jihad; mpac; msm; muslimbrotherhood; muslims; odu; olddominion; pc; religionofpeace; salamalmarayati; susannedumbleton; thomasklocek; un; wahhabi; wahhabism

1 posted on 04/18/2005 7:45:21 PM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sergey1973; SJackson; jan in Colorado; USF; Former Dodger; Dark Skies; Fred Nerks; Hudobna

Ping


2 posted on 04/18/2005 7:47:01 PM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...

If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.


3 posted on 04/18/2005 7:50:55 PM PDT by SJackson (The first duty of a leader is to make himself be loved without courting love, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Everything is morally relative to the LLL--except for Israel and President Bush's Amerika, which are pure evil.

And I'm not so comfortable in blaming leftist professors for the uncurious graduates churned out by the universities. Oh, I don't deny that there's a palpable bias, but it is up to the student to pursue rival viewpoints and self-education. Formal schooling can only achieve so much--it leaves many gaps. It can but whet one's appetitite for learning, and encourage informal study on particular subjects of interest. The people who swallow all the lies and ideologies of the Left do so because they are intellectually lazy. They do not have the constitution to learn on their own.

The leader of men described in this article may have great intelligence, but his complete lack of industry and self-motivation will doom him to a second-tier mind. He will do well in college and law school, and will likely be successful in his legal practice, but he will not attain any lasting fame or accomplish any world-changing feats. He will be but a cog in the machine, a care-taker, a vassal of the truly great individuals. I am of the mind that formal schooling is but a means to blackmail the masses into following a certain line of thought, to groom them in a secondary role of the care-takers of society. The truly great bristle at these constraints, and exist outside the system--they rise above the prosaic existence of the university and achieve everlasting glory through force of personality and the striking originality of thought. That is why all the world-historical figures have been poor-to-mediocre students.
4 posted on 04/18/2005 8:00:47 PM PDT by Cyclopean Squid (History remembers only what was, not what might have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Ping


5 posted on 04/18/2005 8:03:40 PM PDT by stradivarius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclopean Squid

What you said, all of it!


6 posted on 04/18/2005 8:11:52 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Proud to be an Aussie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Liberals and Muslims hold to tons of myths like the above to justify their hatred.
They counter factual accounts of terrorist atrocities by saying that they are just "Zionist conspiracies"


7 posted on 04/18/2005 8:15:19 PM PDT by FierceKulak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Cyclopean Squid
I am of the mind that formal schooling is but a means to blackmail the masses into following a certain line of thought, to groom them in a secondary role of the care-takers of society.

It wasn't always that way. I attended high school and college in the fifties abd they were exactly as leartning institutions should be. Some made good use of them and some didn't. For those who didn't it wasn't due to brainwashing nor discouragement by the schools.

9 posted on 04/18/2005 8:45:59 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cyclopean Squid
I am of the mind that formal schooling is but a means to blackmail the masses into following a certain line of thought, to groom them in a secondary role of the care-takers of society.

It wasn't always that way. I attended high school and college in the fifties and they were exactly as learning institutions should be. Some made good use of them and some didn't. For those who didn't, their lack of success wasn't due to brainwashing or discouragement by the schools.

10 posted on 04/18/2005 8:47:37 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Academia's abdication of its responsibility means that otherwise bright and capable Muslim students will not be afforded the opportunity - as many of us have been blessed to have - to re-evaluate and reassess their belief systems.

Academia is obviously wise enough to realize Muslims are completely incapable of rational thought and self-examination. (/hesitantly sarcastic)

11 posted on 04/18/2005 8:51:37 PM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
It wasn't always that way. I attended high school and college in the fifties and they were exactly as learning institutions should be. Some made good use of them and some didn't. For those who didn't, their lack of success wasn't due to brainwashing or discouragement by the schools.

I'm not sure when the Change occurred. Primary and secondary institutions probably declined in the wake of the dreadful busing program designed to implement integration after Brown, which lead to the bankruptcy of many public school systems. As for college, I think it has entered the point where they indiscriminately let anyone in. Colleges have ceased to be the bastions of the elite and are now for everyone. They let people in who probably have no business being there. The result--it is nothing but a 4 year vacation from reality, a period of drunken debauchery. Oh, it's fun all right, but it's a waste of time, which in life is precious. A college degree is now meaningless--virtually everyone has one, and all one has to show for it is an increased tolerance of alcohol and a massive student loan debt.

Furthermore, I am convinced that the period spent in college is designed to erode the values inculcated by one's parents. Behavior of all sort is encouraged, thus leading to the acceptance of moral relativism--the lessons of the weekend go hand in hand with the lessons in the classroom.

I have a very low opinion of the American higher education system, and what's worse--I enjoyed my time there immensely. What was it that Aldous Huxley said? We have learned to love our slavery.
12 posted on 04/18/2005 8:57:15 PM PDT by Cyclopean Squid (History remembers only what was, not what might have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cyclopean Squid
I think you have it figured out quite well. IIRC, the transformation began around the middle seventies, after the law suits over the civil rights act had worked themselves out and it was finally decided that the only way to integrate was to force it by busing. As you say, down hill from there. The left had the upper hand.
13 posted on 04/18/2005 9:18:09 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Mowbray is so right.


14 posted on 04/19/2005 3:29:25 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John; jan in Colorado; Dark Skies; Proud Infidel; Fred Nerks
Thanks for the ping(s)...

Good article, and right on target. Of course the mythical "Jenin Massacre" is not the only legend that still exists only in the minds of the uninformed.

Over on the islamic forums the myth of who shot Mohammed Al Dura has elevated him to become the unwitting poster boy for the islamic whine-a-thon of "victimhood" while many educational elites (and much of the MSM) continue to hit the snooze button every time this topic comes up...

Another myth that is busted:

Who caused the televised death of 12-year-old Mohammed al-Dura?
(see the links at the bottom of that article too)

WHO KILLED MUHAMMAD AL-DURA?

The truth about Mohamad Aldura

Probe: Famous 'martyrdom' of Palestinian boy 'staged'

Despite Evidence, French TV Still Refuses Al-Dura Probe

Who Shot Mohammed al-Dura?

15 posted on 04/19/2005 3:39:09 AM PDT by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
...the granddaddy of all modern-day terrorists, Muslim Brotherhood, also got the jump on Israel, launching more than two decades earlier. Yet the doctrine of the Muslim leadership is that creating a Palestinian state will eliminate terrorism.

Yup, in their twisted minds, once they have conqured Israel, they are free to focus on EUrabia. What's that old saying... "First the Saturday people, and then the sunday people" ("deal" with the Jews first, and then the Christians).

See: The Muslim Brotherhood's Conquest of Europe

Its motto is telling: "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope...."

...These organizations represent themselves as mainstream, even as they continue to embrace the Brotherhood's radical views and maintain links to terrorists. With moderate rhetoric and well-spoken German, Dutch, and French, they have gained acceptance among European governments and media alike. Politicians across the political spectrum rush to engage them whenever an issue involving Muslims arises or, more parochially, when they seek the vote of the burgeoning Muslim community.

But, speaking Arabic or Turkish before their fellows Muslims, they drop their facade and embrace radicalism. While their representatives speak about interfaith dialogue and integration on television, their mosques preach hate and warn worshippers about the evils of Western society. While they publicly condemn the murder of commuters in Madrid and school children in Russia, they continue to raise money for Hamas and other terrorist organizations....

16 posted on 04/19/2005 3:48:20 AM PDT by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Too many of these "academics" and their ROP buddies believe their own press releases.


17 posted on 04/19/2005 4:51:21 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (tired of all the shucking and jiving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

The Leftist Intellectual Circles and the Media they dominate had a long history of being sympathetic to the ideas, movements or individuals aimed against Western Civilization. Islamist propaganda would never have had much effect had it not been for sympathetic liberal left Media.

Liberal Leftists will support any movement aimed against Western Civilization (Communism, Islamism, etc.) and modern Israel as a successor to ancient Israel that gave the world Western Civilization is their number one target precisely for that.


18 posted on 04/19/2005 7:50:30 AM PDT by sergey1973 (Russian American Political Blogger, Arm Chair Strategist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson