Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PBS Concerned with Conservative Push
Washington Post ^ | April 22, 2005 | Paul Farhi

Posted on 04/22/2005 8:38:21 AM PDT by blues-train

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: DumpsterDiver

No, not you....most definately aimed at the nimrods at PBS.


21 posted on 04/22/2005 9:14:35 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Beth528

yeah ,... known as , PlentyBullS**t ,...it is wall to wall bolsheviks , no kiddin' , right down to the maintenance staff and the subcontractors/vendors


22 posted on 04/22/2005 9:16:41 AM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dad yer funny

I can believe that!


23 posted on 04/22/2005 9:20:20 AM PDT by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blues-train

If we stop funding PBS the liberals will still own it and will likely get even more donations from Democrats.

Better that conservatives take it over and create a conservative network there that will be the answer to the middle-left FOX and the other radical communist networks.

We can finance our PBS network with the Democrat's tax dollars.


24 posted on 04/22/2005 9:22:45 AM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
It's about these idiots who criticize the Conservatives 50 weeks out of a year then begs them for money during a two week fund raiser.

A two week fundraiser? Here in LA, it's more like a four week fundraiser, every other month.

25 posted on 04/22/2005 9:27:53 AM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blues-train

Here's an idea:
First make PBS very conservative.

Then the Libs will WANT to de-fund it!

Problem solved!


26 posted on 04/22/2005 9:45:57 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blues-train
I don't care how much money PBS takes from the Feds if they bring back good old British period drama like Upstairs Downstairs.


BUMP

27 posted on 04/22/2005 9:52:17 AM PDT by tm22721
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blues-train
PBS Concerned with Conservative Push

Yes, and we're going to push into PBS if the new "fairness" doctrine goes into effect. I can't wait! Conservative TV and radio WITHOUT commercials! < :D

28 posted on 04/22/2005 10:26:51 AM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

As a pretty rigid libertarian, I am fundamentally against a lot of federal government funded/run programs, but I think public broadcasting as it was initially set up is a good idea - in that it was intended to be a modularly regulated educational outlet.

However, as production costs have decreased and federal funding and corporate sponsorship has grown over the past two decades it has become yet another liberal media outlet.

The PBS funding is pulled as opposed to pushed. If they want the funding they get it.

When I was getting my master's at Emerson I took a public broadcasting management class which was taught by Robert Hilliard - an FDR liberal (the guy's probably 80 years old) who ran PBS under 4 presidents from JFK to Ford.

Hilliard is a very intelligent man who was open to conservative views (which in this class of 40 included me and one more person), I found the class to be very informative and eye opening, in that this man who really helped to shape PBS & CPB was vocal about his opinions.

In one discussion about a liberal bias, I said, part of the reason why PBS is losing a lot of viewers to cable outlets such as Discovery and History (the #1 problem facing PBS) is because a majority of people who fall into the demographic that watches PBS (intelligent educated people over 35) have different political views than those being increasing espoused by the PBS talking heads and creative programming , and frankly are instinctually insulted when they feel they are being lectured, and don't like seeing their tax dollars going to an institution that is biased.

Hilliard agreed it was biased, but said it was the duty of any institution like PBS to speak to the needs of the underclass.

Trust me; this view is shared by the majority of people working at WGBH and the Pacifica stations which produce almost all of the programming for PBS.

Obviously they are scared; all liberals get scared when their intellectual monopolies are challenged.

The issue to them is not about equal time with conservatives, it is the fact that the introduction of opposing views to a relative safe haven will disrupt the PBS fallacy expressed by Hilliard.

Look, if PBS keeps losing viewer ship, then they will not be able to justify their budgets. If I were a liberal, I would acquiesce here, it’s either accept the ½ hour of conservative talking heads or lose the one stage where you can show documentaries about transgendered paraplegic illegal immigrants.


29 posted on 04/22/2005 11:59:11 AM PDT by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
Actually, I can't see the guy in charge of writing advertising for postage stamps over at the USPS complaining about the Board of Directors interfering with his First Amendment rights ~ or maybe I can.

Believe it or not PBS used to have it's corporate headquarters in the same building at L'Enfant Plaza as USPS.

30 posted on 04/22/2005 4:28:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax

There was no PBS until LBJ.


31 posted on 04/22/2005 7:07:57 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

yeah, actually you are right, but public broadcasting as a federal entity existed since the 1930's with the federal communications act being passed and kennedy expanded it greatly in 61 or 62. I forget what the bill he passed was called.


32 posted on 04/22/2005 11:45:00 PM PDT by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Eric,

Your post prompted me to do some googling, before PBS was formed, Hilliard was the chief of the "public broadcasting branch of the FCC".


33 posted on 04/23/2005 12:03:00 AM PDT by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax

I seed had been planted.


34 posted on 04/23/2005 1:26:48 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson