Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House to Enforce Abortion-Fetus Law
Associated Press ^ | KEVIN FREKING

Posted on 04/23/2005 8:26:14 AM PDT by kingattax

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration said Friday that it would enforce a nearly 3-year-old federal law that requires doctors to attempt to keep alive a fetus that survives an abortion.

In making the announcement, the Department of Health and Human Services Department said it was an attempt to educate the public about the little-known law. Officials said they didn't know how often a fetus survives an abortion and would not say whether there have been any complaints about a lack of enforcement.

"As a matter of law and policy, the (department) will investigate all circumstances where individuals and entities are reported to be withholding medical care from an infant born alive in potential violation of federal statutes for which we are responsible," HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said in a statement.

"We will also take proactive steps to educate state officials, health care providers, hospitals and child protection agencies about their obligation to born-alive infants under federal law," Leavitt said.

The Born-Alive Infant Protection Act of 2002 amends the legal definitions of "person,""human being,""child" and "individual" to include any fetus that survives an abortion procedure.

Those who meet the definition of "individual" are entitled to certain protections under federal law. In particular, hospitals can't refuse to treat them.

HHS spokesman Kevin Keane said the department's action was not politically motivated. He said Leavitt had been asked about the issue at his confirmation hearing.

The National Right to Life Committee welcomed the department's move.

"The 2002 law and today's actions by the agency were both badly needed, because there are those in our society who have convinced themselves that some newborn infants - particularly those born alive during abortions, or with handicaps - are not really legal persons," said Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the group.

A spokesman for NARAL Pro-Choice America said the group had no comment and that it did not oppose the 2002 legislation because it did not impede on a woman's right to have an abortion.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionsurvivors; baipa; bornalive; bush43; hhs; murderingtheunborn; newborns
Dealing with another segment of the "culture of death" vultures. More spawn of hell
1 posted on 04/23/2005 8:26:14 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Are abortionists edumacated on life-saving techniques?

Now that I think of it. Are abortionists "doctors"?

2 posted on 04/23/2005 8:29:33 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

we better check on that.


3 posted on 04/23/2005 8:34:00 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Indeed. If they are not considered "doctors", then this law does not apply to them.


4 posted on 04/23/2005 8:35:50 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Wouldn't it be nice if the headline instead read....

"WHITE HOUSE TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS"


5 posted on 04/23/2005 8:36:26 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

they are "women's reproductive health specialists"


6 posted on 04/23/2005 8:37:11 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

AMEN, brother !


7 posted on 04/23/2005 8:37:41 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Wouldn't it be nice if the headline instead read....

"WHITE HOUSE TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS"

Would you mind not hijacking threads?


8 posted on 04/23/2005 8:38:48 AM PDT by rdb3 (To the world, you're one person. To one person, you may be the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

"A spokesman for NARAL Pro-Choice America said the group had no comment and that it did not oppose the 2002 legislation because it did not impede on a woman's right to have an abortion." In other words, they don't ever care a whit about the other human beings effected by abortion, the little ones, so long as and because of a woman's right to hire the serial killer is not infringed. Filthy ghouls ...


9 posted on 04/23/2005 8:42:06 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Wouldn't it be nice if the headline instead read.... "WHITE HOUSE TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS"

Heyyyyyy. You might be onto something here. Instead of calling them "fetuses", let's call them "illegal immigrants".

I mean, they both come here uninvited and are immediately totally dependent on others for their survival and subsistance.

10 posted on 04/23/2005 8:43:20 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

you guys are really onto something here....let's email our "real" presidente vicente fox and have him threaten these "doctores" if they mess with these "entrants".


11 posted on 04/23/2005 8:51:06 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Would you mind not hijacking threads?
======
Sorry my friend but it does have a nice ring to it...


12 posted on 04/23/2005 8:53:40 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
This law and enforcement implies that most time abortions result in a live bouncing baby. I find it hard to believe that is true.
13 posted on 04/23/2005 10:42:48 AM PDT by SkoalBandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkoalBandit

sadly, you're probably right


14 posted on 04/23/2005 10:45:45 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SkoalBandit
This law and enforcement implies that most time abortions result in a live bouncing baby. I find it hard to believe that is true.

The law does not deny that most abortions result in a dead baby. What it does say is that those few that survive have to be treated as living human beings.

15 posted on 04/23/2005 12:12:59 PM PDT by Catholic and Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Catholic and Conservative

This enforcement just gets the troops excited. Bush is just saying Hi remember me I am doing something for you guys.


16 posted on 04/23/2005 12:19:43 PM PDT by SkoalBandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

"A fetus that survives an abortion"?! There is no such thing as a born fetus! That would be a neonate for someone insisting on medical terminology, or a baby, infant or child for someone speaking normally. Interesting article, though.


17 posted on 04/23/2005 1:21:58 PM PDT by Catholic and Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson