Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Filibuster, The Senator Goes Nuclear (The Nuclear Option originated on Free Republic)
The New York Sun ^ | April 29, 2005 | Alicia Colon

Posted on 04/29/2005 3:38:17 PM PDT by Grand Old Partisan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Grand Old Partisan
More history here (not for you, you already know it):

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Gold_Gupta_JLPP_article.pdf

highly recommended


21 posted on 04/29/2005 5:07:18 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan

Interesting read.


22 posted on 04/29/2005 5:09:21 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("REMEMBER WILLIAM CRUM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
Vice President Nixon tried to get the 1957 Civil Rights Act passed by bringing it directly to the Senate floor. Unfortunately, it was a Democratic Congress and the Republicans were outvoted.

It's getting harder and harder for the Dims to live in ignorance of their own history...

23 posted on 04/29/2005 5:10:27 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("REMEMBER WILLIAM CRUM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan

Thanks for the post. I thought the moniker "nuclear option" referred to the childish tantrums the democrats were sure to throw once the Republicans restored order.


24 posted on 04/29/2005 5:12:17 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Why not just declare the senate rule unconstitutional
as it clearly is. A senate rule can not trump Article II
Section 2 paragraph 2. When not otherwise stated as in
the case of treaties a simple majority has always been
the default. The senate can make rules for themselves as
long as they do not conflict with the constitution. What
am I missing here?
25 posted on 04/29/2005 5:12:43 PM PDT by SAWTEX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Frist's comments on the Senate floor weren't weak yesterday, but some on here want to rip him for trying to avert a complete shutdown of the Senate, which IS what will happen when we go nuclear.

His compromise, which I sense is his final offer (it dang well better be) is very good and strikes a good balance that all can support. But, if the Dems reject it, it is nuclear time, no matter what the consequences.


26 posted on 04/29/2005 5:13:15 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SAWTEX
Why not just declare the senate rule unconstitutional as it clearly is. A senate rule can not trump Article II Section 2 paragraph 2. When not otherwise stated as in the case of treaties a simple majority has always been the default. The senate can make rules for themselves as long as they do not conflict with the constitution. What am I missing here?

The Sente has been dysfunctional on the point of unlimited debate and unanimous consent for quite awhile. They like being dysfunctional. The public lacks the wisdom to see it, and the will to make it stop.

27 posted on 04/29/2005 5:15:58 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
Many people may recall my first posting this idea back in February 2003.

Oh, man and now we're never going to hear the end of it I guess :-)

28 posted on 04/29/2005 5:22:27 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
It is certainly true that if V.P. Colfax had the power to make filibusters legal, then V.P. Cheney has the power to make them illegal. It was after all only a V.P.s ruling that made the filibuster legal. For over half a century before 1872 what we call the filibuster was illegal.

Good and interesting point. Did Michael Zak make the same point to Frist?

29 posted on 04/29/2005 5:29:10 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

I think his final-offer compromise is designed to ensure the 51st vote from weak-kneed Republican Senators.


30 posted on 04/29/2005 5:30:51 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: juggernaut
I quit too, and so did my fiance'....twice.

I'm trying to cut back, at least.

31 posted on 04/29/2005 7:47:54 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan

BTTT


32 posted on 04/29/2005 8:19:58 PM PDT by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Grand Old Partisan
I've used some of your work to both silence and shock people

as have I... that and the racist history of gun-control in America. Tends to make leftists go into brain-cramps

33 posted on 04/29/2005 8:39:19 PM PDT by King Prout (blast and char it among fetid buzzard guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: King Prout; rdb3

Yes, the first gun controls in the USA were enacted by Democrats to keep blacks unarmed.


34 posted on 04/30/2005 5:23:28 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan

These are the Senators to call to help President Bush get a vote on his embattled judicial nominees:

Senator John McCain (R-AZ)

Washington, DC: (202) 224-2235
Phoenix, AZ: (602) 952-2410

Senator Lincoln Chafee (R-RI)
Washington, DC: (202) 224-2921
Providence, RI: (401) 453-5294

Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

Washington, DC: (202) 224-5344
Augusta, ME: (207) 622-8292

Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE)

Washington, DC: (202) 224-4224
Omaha, NE: (402) 758-8981

Senator John Warner (R-VA)

Washington, DC: (202) 224-2023
Roanoke, VA: (540) 857-2676


35 posted on 04/30/2005 12:20:05 PM PDT by votelife (Elect a filibuster proof majority, 60 conservative US Senators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Frist's comments on the Senate floor weren't weak yesterday, but some on here want to rip him for trying to avert a complete shutdown of the Senate, which IS what will happen when we go nuclear.

Let's go nuclear. I fail to see what the big deal is if they shut down the Senate? Even if the Repubs run it...SHUT IT DOWN !!! nothing good ever comes when the legislature is in session. More taxes silly prescription drug benefits more user fees more restrictions., and on and on.

Shut it down should be the mantra here

36 posted on 05/12/2005 8:49:12 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Kerry is a member of the Democratic Socialists of Amerika)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson