Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More 20-somethings depending on parents again
The Sun News ^ | 5/2/05 | Rick Montgomery

Posted on 05/02/2005 8:31:54 AM PDT by qam1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: qam1

The part about fewer teens driving is soooo true.

My 17 year old is the only one of his friends that drives.

The kids keep their restricted licenses, but don't convert to a full driver's license because that immediately ups your insurance payment about $250 per month.


21 posted on 05/02/2005 8:53:58 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

Well, it is either that or they shack up early.

Probably good to pay down their debts.


22 posted on 05/02/2005 8:54:26 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Children should be taught (as mine have been) to put duty first. In order to avoid the crushing debt and the dependence on mom and dad, my sons are joining the military (as I did) and will EARN the GI Bill, and LEARN to live by their own resources.

College education is a waste on an 18 year old. Too much partying. Let'em work in the real world a while (as I did as an enlisted man for 4 years) to learn what life is really like and to gain some focus, then go to back to school when you are able to understand the serious business that college is. My 2 cents worth.

23 posted on 05/02/2005 8:54:31 AM PDT by buzzsaw6 (Major, USAF/Scoutmaster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

I think much of this could be empirically quantified. That is, check ratios of wages/income of graduates against certain indicators, such as housing cost, transportation, food, etc. and hold the values in constant dollars and see if there really is an increase in economic pressure on today's twentysomethings.

On the other hand, I think there is a strong element of wanting instant and perfect gratification. As the article suggested, are twentysomething waiting to find that mythical, "perfect soul-mate"? Are twentysomethings unwilling to live in an apartment because they think they deserve a house right away?

In other words, absent hard economic data, perhaps we should assume that the expectations of these twentysomethings, pampered by their relatively affluent parents, may have unreasonable expectations, an indicator of which may be large personal credit card debt at a young age that contributes to their economic troubles.


24 posted on 05/02/2005 8:54:51 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueminnesota

When I got out of the USAF and was going to college, I did something crazy to afford my apartment....I got ROOMMATES!


25 posted on 05/02/2005 8:55:30 AM PDT by Holicheese (How many more must die Mister Speaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Good for you! That's the way this is supposed to work - this business of growing up.

I got out of college when I was 22 and out of my mother's house three months later. THAT was a big day!


26 posted on 05/02/2005 8:57:26 AM PDT by RexBeach ("I can see it now. You and the moon. You wear a necktie so I'll know you." -Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Holicheese

That's great, I had roommates too. But my point was, if these kids are sponging off the public I have a right to bitch about it, if it is a private family arrangement I don't really.


28 posted on 05/02/2005 8:59:52 AM PDT by blueminnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach; macaroona

The funny thing is...I have a marketing degree but didn't actually need it for my job! My first job out of college needed a degree and I barely made 22 grand that year. I now make 3 times that and while having a degree certainly made my resume look better it wasn't a must.


29 posted on 05/02/2005 9:02:37 AM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: qam1; A. Pole; Willie Green
I really don't find it a bad thing at all as long as the adult kids are doing their share of the chores and/or dropping a few shekels into the pot. I know this is common in Europe and elsewhere in the world, in fact, my dentist, he's of Chinese ancestry, he's in his 30's and still lives at home. I think this was more common here in America that is until after World War II up until the 1970's maybe where the kids did move out and get apartments and then homes when the post-war economy really boomed. Just look at the "Waltons" on TV, it was common to have more than one generation under the same roof. Now with outsourcing and our job losses and the loss of our prosperity, we are seeing what life was like prior to the post World War II boom.

If you want a good look at life before the World War II boom, read "Susan Lenox - Her Rise and Fall" by David Graham Phillips (1908, released in 1917) where most of the time, adult children stayed at home until, hopefully, they can make it on their own, due to the lower wages then, doubly so if you were a single woman. I think the 1945-75 period of economic prosperity in America was unique and we might see things and do things like we did back in our past again. Another piece of literature in a similar vein seems to be Theodore Dreiser's "Sister Carrie" (1900).

I pinged A. Pole and Willie Green since this subject does lead to our economy and the problems we are seeing with it.
30 posted on 05/02/2005 9:04:18 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - Any Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

I have three children with summer/fall birthdays and I sent them all to Kindergarten right away at age 4/5 (not holding them back until they are 6, the current fad) so that when they are 17, they can move out of the house!

I see no reason why they can't rent a cheap room in a basement somewhere, like I did.


31 posted on 05/02/2005 9:04:55 AM PDT by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: RockinRight
28 years old, I make more money than either of my parents and have lived on my own since I graduated from college. I couldn't wait to move out! I don't know how these people can do this

The cost of living in California is higher. A LOT higher. And some careers don't pay off as well, or as soon, as young people are led to believe.

33 posted on 05/02/2005 9:05:24 AM PDT by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

This drives me crazy. There are no excuses. If you make the right choices, you get where you want to be. I'm 26, put myself though college and graduated in 2001 with a degree in Journalism, but found a job that made decent money. I never went back to my parents. I am now married, and own a house that has almost doubled in value since we bought it, and have plenty in savings.

Now granted, the house may not have come along without meeting my husband in college, but still. I think I'd still be in a great situation if that didn't happen.

It's about the right choices. My mom raised my sister and I working 3 jobs, and I learned that I did not what that to happend to my kids some day. I wanted to be able to provide for my family the things that I was never offered.

It can be done.


34 posted on 05/02/2005 9:05:28 AM PDT by uca99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: peter the great

Why is every generation worse than the generation before? Many young married couples in the early 1950's had to live with their parents before they could buy a house. During the immigration years in this country apartments housed up to 8 adults, married or not. When families had large farms early in this country, the parents would GIVE their children land to build their own homes and live near by.

Baby boomers aren't paying for college so the kids have alot of debt. Divorce if so high that these kids have no one helping them make decisions because their parents are too concerned with themselves. 20 year olds now have to pay auto insurance, health care, and high taxes on everything. When I moved out in the 70's, car insurance was an option, health care was cheap, renting was cheap, gas for my car was 70 cents, ciggs were 50 cents.

Also these kids are lied too. College is NOT for everyone. You still have to have a high IQ to graduate in a good major. Yet the boomers want their kids to go to college , take out loans and let the tax payer worry about them paying it back.


35 posted on 05/02/2005 9:05:28 AM PDT by tbird5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: qam1

So, get used to adultescents - also known as the "kidults," "thresholders," and "boomerang babies." Sociologists say we will be seeing more in years to come.


I am mentoring some guys just out of prison. They remind me of Peter Pan.......just don't want to grow up.


36 posted on 05/02/2005 9:08:01 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
That does not explain fully why things are at this state, then again, 100 years ago it was not shameful for a family to remain close and even to provide for grandparents as they got older.

See my post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1395210/posts?page=30#30 for pretty much the same take I had on all of this. I do live at home myself, so go ahead, fire away, I got the armour of an M1 tank. B-)
37 posted on 05/02/2005 9:08:33 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - Any Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: qam1

This is not a radically new social trend; it's simply a return to the way things used to be in this and many other countries. Think of it as the "family manor" trend. Baby-boomers grew up sharing a small bedroom with one sibling and a bathroom with two or three more. Just watch a rerun of "The Brady Bunch". Nowadays, kids have their own bedrooms and, more and more often, each bedroom has a bathroom. The "bunkhouse" mentality was replaced by the "suite" approach. When baby-boomers returned from college, there wasn't much insentive for them to move into their parents' cramped house. Today, a 23 year old college grad with a good relationship with his or her parents has the choice of living on the cheap in some apartment or living in his old "suite" in his parents' manor house with all the fixings (pool, big kitchen, cable/satellite, etc.).


39 posted on 05/02/2005 9:09:49 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

It cuts both ways, how many parents move in with their kids when they reach retirement age? My mother-in-law lives with us, and I wouldn't have it any other way. She helps with raising our kids, and it's certainly better than paying to put them into a nursing home, as well as the cost of hiring a nanny. I think this is another trend that is also on the increase.


40 posted on 05/02/2005 9:11:04 AM PDT by dfwgator (Minutemen: Just doing the jobs that American politicians won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson