Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DustyMoment

I'm sorry if I'm not communicating well this morning I'm not saying that 23% of 100 is 29. I guess I didin't make it clear later in my post that 23% of 100 is 23 but we are not talking about straight percentages here were talking about taxes. if you go to thier website they will use the same numbers I just did to explain that as currently propsed the NRST is a inclusive Tax they want to charge a 23% inclusive tax on a retail purchase which is where they get that 129 number. So if you make a purchase of 100$ they figure the tax INCLUSIVE so you would pay 129 for you goods because 23% of 129 is 29 and 129-29=100 not like the exclusive state sales tax I pay here in Texas where if the rate were 23% (thank God it's not) the straight forward tax on $100 would be $23 for a total of $123 go to thier website and see for yourself.


24 posted on 05/03/2005 6:06:51 AM PDT by Texas Patriot (Remember.... The Alamo, never forget HOORAHH!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Patriot

Thanks for the clarification. That's not my understanding of how this is supposed to work because, if true, it sounds as though it is double taxation.

I want to dig into it a little deeper and see what's going on.


53 posted on 05/03/2005 8:09:24 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson