Posted on 05/06/2005 7:58:44 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback
If you happened to stumble across a devout Christian in Hollywood, you’d likely assume he was one of two things: He must be Mel Gibson, or he must be lost.
But, in fact, you just might have run into a Christian businessman named Philip Anschutz. Philip has just spent $150 million to film The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, the first of the Narnia books by C. S. Lewis. Anschutz is showing us what we’d find at the box office if Hollywood gave Americans the kind of films we really want to see.
When he first considered bankrolling films, Anschutz—a billionaire from Colorado—asked the first question any smart businessman asks: What do the people want? After all, with filmmaking, as with all business ventures, the idea is—or should be—to make money.
The answer was not difficult to find. Of the twenty top-grossing films of all time, not a single one is rated R. Of the top fifty films, only five are rated R. Clearly, Americans want family fare they can take the kids to.
And yet, as Anschutz noted in a recent speech, since the year 2000, Hollywood has “turned out more than five times as many R-rated films as it has films rated G or PG or soft PG-13. . . . Don’t these figures make you wonder what’s wrong with Hollywood just from a business point of view?”—good question Anschutz asked. The films were not just bad business; they were polluting the culture—the culture in which Anschutz’s grandchildren live, a fact that made him mad. So a few years ago, he decided to stop cursing the darkness and light a cinematic candle: He went into the film business himself, forming the Anschutz Film Group and a children’s division, called Walden Media. Then he got busy making movies that were not only entertaining, but also carried strong moral messages.
He visited groups of parents, teachers, and children and asked them: “What kind of movies would you like to see made? How can we affirm the good, and de-emphasize the bad and the negative?”
Among his films is one I enjoyed immensely, the recent Oscar-winner about the life of the late Ray Charles, called Ray. He made the popular family films Because of Winn-Dixie and Holes. Still in production are treatments of children’s classics: Charlotte’s Web and Bridge to Terabithia. And Anschutz is sparing no expense in making The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, which hits the box office in the fall. If it’s a hit, Anschutz may film the rest of the Narnia books.
This is exciting news, because films have such a tremendous impact on our culture. And that is why Anschutz, as a Christian, feels that he has a responsibility to fund uplifting, life-affirming movies. Good for him—a great example of a Christian living his faith. And make no mistake, secular movie-makers understand the cultural impact, because they are willing to lose money making R-rated films few people want to see: It’s more important for them to promote their philosophies and impress their edgy friends and film critics than to produce hits.
Imagine what kind of place Hollywood would be if every filmmaker wanted to please the audience, make money, and honor God. Around every Tinsel Town corner, we’d find someone like Philip Anschutz—or Mel Gibson. And we Christians—to our great delight—would have to find something else to protest.
But Mr. Anschutz, if you're reading this, I will go see every Narnia movie in the theater (and bring my wife and kids) and then buy the DVD's. Count on it.
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
The Lion...
The Witch...
...and the Wardrobe.
Oh, and Susan and Edmund, too.
BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
The Lion...
The Witch...
...and the Wardrobe.
Oh, and Susan and Edmund, too.
Are these really production pics? Or artist renditions?
I think Jadis the Witch looks incredible!
There was a great article in The Atlantic, May '05, about Anschutz and his foray into Hollywood. The idea is that if the first movie works, they will make the whole series. He's not doing this just because he needs something to do with his money - he believes in the cause, and fully intends to recoup his investment.
Very interesting. Thanks for the ping, Mr. Silverback.
BTW, since Aslan is 100% CGI, I suppose you could say it's an artist impression and a real shot.
Can't wait to see it, now that I know!
I hope this does really, really, REALLY well.
That, and I hope it's more than extremely, scrumptiously good.
(And not in the Turkish Delight way)
Heh-heh!
How long before you see this photo-shopped with young Barbara Bush's face on FR?
Thanks for the ping.
Good films are not merely a matter of technique. They have to be truthful.
Thank you for this article and the pics.
Very encouraging.
I arranged some financing for Phil about 10 years ago with a consortium of banks. He is pure class, and has been donating millions every year for many years to conservative causes.
I think most of these images are artist's conceptions, btw--I don't think that's how the CGI's gonna look.
Family audiences are a huge market, but they often demand quality product. Many filmmakers lack the skills needed to produce such product, and thus wouldn't reach this market even if they wanted to. The market of people who simply like to look at naked women isn't as big, but--at least before the days of the Internet--it's been much less discriminating. Filmmakers whose only skill is putting naked women on the screen aren't apt to make as much money as skilled filmmakers producing quality movies for a family audience, but they're apt to make more money than they themselves would make trying to produce drivel for family audiences.
Have there BEEN any pro-life novels?
I just finished one recently, titled Evil Interrupted, about cloning and abortion. It's not a bad story and decidedly pro-life. Silverback is reading it, I think.
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
Walden Media
1888 Century Park East, 14th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
p: 1+310.887.1000 | f: 1+310.887.1001
PRESS CONTACT
press@walden.com
EDUCATION, OUTREACH, INTERACTIVE, PUBLISHING
Walden Media
294 Washington Street, 7th floor
Boston, MA 02108
p: 1+617.451.5420 | f: 1+617.451.5850
OUTREACH CONTACT
outreach@walden.com
Website: http://www.walden.com
I wish it were just that. The feminist POV is that, beyond the baby thing, all differences between the sexes are social constructs. If men can be warriors, so can women, and the movies should depict them as such. Etc., ad nauseam.
That, at least, is what they say, although I do wonder if they really believe it. Perhaps some do. We live in such a technology saturated age that a lot of people have never brushed up against serious physical work, even briefly. I have met a few gals over the years who seemed to have no real conception of how much stronger men are. They've never done hard labor, they've never trained seriously for a contact sport, they've never been in a serious fight (neither have I, but I have done the first two), and very often, they hang around with the kind of noodle-armed men who are about as weak as they are. No clue.
Excellent book.
That's downright astonishing. Who knew?
Thank you so much! I will contact those offices right away.
Excellent points. I know a woman who is into body building (not the ugly bulky kind but...) and whenever we discuss this issue she is duty-bound to do the "women are just as worthy as men in combat" blah blah blah thing. When the discussion gets more to the practical instead of the statistics (which of course tell very little about the day to day realities), I ask her how many fistfights she's been in. I'm almost 40 and haven't been in a fight in over a decade, but the point is made--I DID get in fights and now I don't have to in part because I LOOK like I can fight. (In reality almost anyone would probably kick my ass.) THAT is the point--it's not about doing reps or being able to shoot a gun. It's about us being different in so many ways--social, instinctive, etc.
Thanks for the titles, will check them out. Am working on a book with a strong pro-life theme even though abortion isn't explicitly mentioned. I've just never seen it in anything but one-sided propaganda, from both sides of the issue, or equivocating PC crap.
The only Narnia book I read was The Last Battle & I recall the girls taking part in the fighting.
Not in the one coming out as a film they didn't. One thing I liked about the Lord of the Rings adaptations was that even though they made many changes they did not violate the spirit of the books, as far as I have been told. (Didn't read them myself.) When I'm seeing a book adaptation, I don't care how many changes they make as long as they are changes made in terms of the storytelling technique--compressing time, for example--and not to take out the "rough edges" of the writer's sensibilities.
Then you are right and if they do it is pointless P.C.
Again, it's not THAT big a deal, but it's silly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.