It sounds like the brain child idea of banning center fire ammunition in as much as the same lame 'thinking' is behind it.
There's at least three ways it can be interpreted to justify confiscations and worse for legally owned firearms.
This is a bad idea.
I'm also willing to bet that the 'amnesty' isn't.
I am disappointed that so many here are going negative without fully understanding the bill or it's intent.
This is the third time this bill has been introduced, I would have thought that many here would have some familiarity with it, and the many reasons to support it.
There is no intent to enable confiscation of ANYTHING that is not already subject to confiscation as contraband.
The intent is actually the opposite, to allow veterans and their heirs to keep arms that are currently regarded as contraband.