Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

Yeah, it just has way too much wiggle room for the gun grabbers.


15 posted on 05/07/2005 2:25:45 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a flaw in my surreality, it's totally unrealistic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare
Yeah, it just has way too much wiggle room for the gun grabbers.

I think it's the database they want. In Chicago they've attempted to get the federal list of multiple handgun (that's 2) purchasers within a week, which the government can legally maintain in order to crosscheck for Chicago purchasers. Would they go after this list to check for federal registrants who hadn't registered with the city, and are thus subject to confiscation and charges? IMO, in a heartbeat. I see little or no upside for gunowners in this.

16 posted on 05/07/2005 2:30:26 PM PDT by SJackson (The first duty of a leader is to make himself be loved without courting love, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

No. it's not.

The bill addresses very specific issues, and is based entirely on existing legal precedent.

I am disappointed that so many here are having trouble understanding it.


29 posted on 05/07/2005 3:14:47 PM PDT by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson