Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Los Alamos director steps down
Government ^ | May 10, 2005 | David McGlinchey

Posted on 05/10/2005 5:03:14 AM PDT by robowombat

Los Alamos director steps down By David McGlinchey

The director of Los Alamos National Laboratory announced last week that he is stepping down after two years filled with controversy and troubling news from one of the nation's leading weapons research facilities.

Pete Nanos took the helm of Los Alamos in January 2003. Since then the laboratory has suffered through security lapses and revelations of procurement abuse by employees. In 2004, Nanos shut down Los Alamos operations for months while officials conducted a security review.

Late last year, the National Nuclear Security Administration initiated an open competition for contractors interested in operating the laboratory, ending a run of more than 60 years by the University of California as the uncontested operator of the elite facility.

Nanos is moving to a post with the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

He will be replaced by Robert Kuckuck, who has experience at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - also run by the University of California - and at the NNSA in Washington. Kuckuck is scheduled to begin his work May 16 and serve as the interim director at least until the current UC contract to run the lab expires later this year.

"Dr. Pete Nanos has led Los Alamos National Lab during a challenging time," said Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman. "He instituted a number of sound business practices that have helped Los Alamos remain one of the premier labs in the world ... I wish him the best of luck in his new responsibilities at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency."

Others, however, were critical of Nanos. A blog devoted to leadership issues at the lab, "LANL: The Real Story," was filled with comments cheering his departure.

On Sunday, the Albuquerque Journal North edition published an editorial that said Nanos' departure is good for Los Alamos.

"Making everybody mad may be good journalism, but it isn't often good management," the editorial said. "Nanos' departure ... may augur well for the future of the lab."

There was also skepticism about Kuckuck. Pete Stockton, a Los Alamos observer at the Project on Government Oversight, said Kuckuck "is one of the good ol' boys."

"He comes from Lawrence Livermore ...they have insurmountable security problems," Stockton said. "A breath of fresh air he is not."

Several others, including the Albuquerque Journal, expressed optimism that the new director could usher in an era of cooperation between scientists and management. Bodman said Kuckuck "brings an enormous wealth of experience to this task."

TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: doe; losalamos; nuclear; resignation

1 posted on 05/10/2005 5:03:14 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim


2 posted on 05/10/2005 5:14:11 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

The pointy heads ground up and spit out another one.

3 posted on 05/10/2005 5:20:01 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Some days it doesn't pay to chew through the straps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

What I want to know is, how the heck d'ya pronounce his name...

4 posted on 05/14/2005 9:39:01 AM PDT by maxwell (Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson