Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HOW WE WOULD FIGHT CHINA
LA NUEVA CUBA ^ | June 2005 | Robert D. Kaplan

Posted on 05/10/2005 6:11:01 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer

The Middle East is just a blip. The American military contest with China in the Pacific will define the twenty-first century. And China will be a more formidable adversary than Russia ever was

For some time now no navy or air force has posed a threat to the United States. Our only competition has been armies, whether conventional forces or guerrilla insurgencies. This will soon change. The Chinese navy is poised to push out into the Pacific—and when it does, it will very quickly encounter a U.S. Navy and Air Force unwilling to budge from the coastal shelf of the Asian mainland. It's not hard to imagine the result: a replay of the decades-long Cold War, with a center of gravity not in the heart of Europe but, rather, among Pacific atolls that were last in the news when the Marines stormed them in World War II. In the coming decades China will play an asymmetric back-and-forth game with us in the Pacific, taking advantage not only of its vast coastline but also of its rear base—stretching far back into Central Asia—from which it may eventually be able to lob missiles accurately at moving ships in the Pacific. In any naval encounter China will have distinct advantages over the United States, even if it lags in technological military prowess. It has the benefit, for one thing, of sheer proximity. Its military is an avid student of the competition, and a fast learner. It has growing increments of "soft" power that demonstrate a particular gift for adaptation. While stateless terrorists fill security vacuums, the Chinese fill economic ones. All over the globe, in such disparate places as the troubled Pacific Island states of Oceania, the Panama Canal zone, and out-of-the-way African nations, the Chinese are becoming masters of indirect influence—by establishing business communities and diplomatic outposts, by negotiating construction and trade agreements. Pulsing with consumer and martial energy, and boasting a peasantry that, unlike others in history, is overwhelmingly literate, China constitutes the principal conventional threat to America's liberal imperium.

How should the United States prepare to respond to challenges in the Pacific? To understand the dynamics of this second Cold War—which will link China and the United States in a future that may stretch over several generations—it is essential to understand certain things about the first Cold War, and about the current predicament of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the institution set up to fight that conflict. This is a story about military strategy and tactics, with some counterintuitive twists and turns.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; chinarussiaalliance; chinesecommies; coldwar; commies; communism; destroagain; internationalism; interventionism; militaryspending; miltarycapacity; neoconservative; putin; russia; socialism; southeastasia; un; unamerican; ussr; zeming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last
To: Pukin Dog
This scenario is utter nonsense. Our subs would literally sink every Chinese ship that is blue water capable within 5 minutes. We would have total air superiority within a week. The next generation artillery that Rummy cancled the Crusader for would leave their tanks smoldering ruins. It would be a massacre from that point forward.

This holds up for the next 20 years. Then where are they going? By then the Japanese will be up to speed, the Taiwanese and South Koreans are tough as nails, the Indians (who have a surprisingly decent navy), and the Eastern Europeans will have caught up and have forward NATO deployment bases. The Chicomms will collapse by then.

If they were smart, they would strike now while we are preoccupied in the midle east and before the Japanese ramp up.

21 posted on 05/10/2005 6:36:17 PM PDT by MattinNJ (Stop voter fraud-enact voter ID cards with photos w/ magnetic stripes that prevent multiple voting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: velyrorenry

Including our food.

Garlic, apples, honey, and shrimp are a few of the products where the Chinese now dominate our food market. Their adversarial trade policies and our "free trade-lower all tariffs" no matter what the cost global trade mantra is putting us in a very insecure position.


22 posted on 05/10/2005 6:36:32 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

So they beat us at sea, so what? Just wait until they step on our soil.


23 posted on 05/10/2005 6:36:51 PM PDT by opinionator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
If Chinese are studying math, physics and science while our own generation is studying sexual perversion...and if China is a creditor nation while we are a debtor nation...and if China is bigger than us...why wouldn't they kick our asses in a few years?

Of course, what do I know? I'm just a has been, Reagan era military analyst. (But I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night!)

24 posted on 05/10/2005 6:37:10 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004
Defend Taiwan and strengthen military ties with Japan.

I agree. Japan and Taiwan need nuclear weapons too.

25 posted on 05/10/2005 6:37:11 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

we'd be looking for a "peaceful solution" right away. Imagine every CEO with hundreds of billion$ invested in China calling the WH and the Congressmen.


26 posted on 05/10/2005 6:38:59 PM PDT by velyrorenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Williams
My bottom line is Bush ought to be expanding our navy, as Reagan did.

I agree. Instead of decommissioning SSBNs we should be building MORE. And with more nuclear warheads for them too.

27 posted on 05/10/2005 6:39:20 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: opinionator

They don't need to, they have the neutron bomb, we don't because Carter thought is was too dangerous.


28 posted on 05/10/2005 6:39:20 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

EMP them over the eastern seaboard, and let the quite self-sufficient country folk do the civil war work for us. Don't forget SDI is working its way into Japan quickly.


29 posted on 05/10/2005 6:40:55 PM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

China will try to destroy our agriculture, and hence our economy, and make us dependant on them. They will use every dirty trick imaginable in biological and economic warfare--and some unimaginable.

And they're off to a good start.


30 posted on 05/10/2005 6:41:16 PM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
boasting a peasantry that, unlike others in history, is overwhelmingly literate

A major potential weak point...

IMO, If we'd maintain and tighten our hold on near Earth orbit and the moon itself, we'd have far less to worry about.

31 posted on 05/10/2005 6:41:25 PM PDT by Axenolith (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: velyrorenry
Fight? Our entire economy would collapse.

They have more to lose than we do. China is NOT even our biggest trading partner. It is Canada that our nation trades most with.

32 posted on 05/10/2005 6:41:40 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch
How quickly people forget that they've been at it for roughly 4000 years. They have an amazingly deep national memory, and have beaten, by assimilation, > 1100 separate invasions and wars.

Even the opium wars and boxer rebellion only involved about 12% of "china proper". The other 88% couldn't have cared less.

Only wholesale individual freedom will take china down from within.

G Khan is reputed to have said that to take on "china" as it was even then, was to be absorbed and consumed, and to be as one was that not even born.

33 posted on 05/10/2005 6:41:59 PM PDT by xcamel (Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: opinionator

Also, there are quite a few chinese on our soil already. And we know they smuggle guns in on the California coast. They are making friends with Venezuela and other leftist countries in South America, and they want to lock up Canada's oil export, which is one of our primary sources of oil. So many of our "free trader" corporations have such significant investment in China now, from all aspects it looks like they are winning.


34 posted on 05/10/2005 6:42:34 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: struggle

That sounds like a plan


35 posted on 05/10/2005 6:43:10 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

that maybe true, technically, but we will blink first. They aren't afraid of taking it to the edge. Think of DOW losing 1000 points the day after.


"They have more to lose than we do. China is NOT even our biggest trading partner. It is Canada that our nation trades most with."


36 posted on 05/10/2005 6:44:19 PM PDT by velyrorenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch

**The Chinese have a paradox that they've yet to resolve. Communism and Capitalism are diametrically opposed to each other. As a result, they have far more internal problems than we do.**

A monocultural, monoracial society is internally much more stronger than a multicultural, multiracial society as ours. As a result we have much more internal problems than the Chinese, irrespective of their "paradox." China understands America's internal problems, America either doesn't or the enemy within is hard at work to turn our country into another banana, multi-ethinic country. The latter is the truth.

As long as America's demographics change, and change for the worse, it will continue to isolate itself from the rest of the world.

Legal immigration, even more so than illegal immigration, is destroying the country our European forefathers build into the most powerful country in the world.


37 posted on 05/10/2005 6:45:15 PM PDT by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

"I agree. Instead of decommissioning SSBNs we should be building MORE. And with more nuclear warheads for them too."

Why?

We had complete nuclear supremacy over Korea. Didn't prevent that war; didn't win it.

We had complete nuclear supremacy over Vietnam. Didn't prevent that war; didn't win it.

We had complete nuclear supremacy over Iran in 1979. Didn't keep them from taking our people hostage, nor did that supremacy free those hostages.

We could obliterate the Islamist world in an afternoon, no problem...but we don't.

Nuclear weapons are expensive to buy, really expensive to guard, and haven't done a damn thing for this country since 1945.

On the other side...

The USSR had complete nuclear supremacy over Afghanistan. Fat lot of good it did them, right?

The ChiComs have complete nuclear supremacy over Taiwan. Whole bunch of good it's doing them now, huh?


38 posted on 05/10/2005 6:45:52 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky

The chinese hold enough of o ur debt to stifle our economy and if it continues to buy our debt to shut us down without firing a shot.

RW


39 posted on 05/10/2005 6:46:49 PM PDT by reluctantwarrior (Strength and Honor, just call me Buzzkill for short......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda

"A monocultural, monoracial society is internally much more stronger than a multicultural, multiracial society as ours."

It is?

That explains why Japan won World War II, I guess.

"As long as America's demographics change, and change for the worse, it will continue to isolate itself from the rest of the world."

Define "worse."


40 posted on 05/10/2005 6:47:18 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson