Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid cites FBI file on judicial pick [Big no-no]
WASH TIMES ^ | 5-13-05 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 05/13/2005 4:59:18 AM PDT by OXENinFLA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-238 next last
To: CDHart

Is there not ONE conservative senator with the backbone to do what needs to be done? I wonder if Jesse were still there if he would call for censure.


41 posted on 05/13/2005 5:27:22 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

looks like it did happen

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1402376/posts?page=24#24


42 posted on 05/13/2005 5:27:43 AM PDT by Mo1 (Hey GOP ---- Not one Dime till Republicans grow a Spine !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: quantim

keep me posteed on what he says today. It will be lots of fun I'm sure


43 posted on 05/13/2005 5:29:17 AM PDT by FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: quantim

keep me posteed on what he says today. It will be lots of fun I'm sure


44 posted on 05/13/2005 5:29:17 AM PDT by FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Reid is one to talk. I've seen his confidential FBI file. Now, I'm not going to say that he had a sexual relationship with a man who was a convicted spy for China. No. It would be wrong of me to even hint that Reid did such a thing. Nor would I breathe a word about his 7 visits to rehab centers for alcoholism. That information is private, and you won't hear me say a word about it ...

WHAT??? Harry Reid had a sexual relationship with a man who was a convicted spy for China???? And he had 7 visits to rehab centers for alcoholism?????

Wow. Let's keep that under wraps.

45 posted on 05/13/2005 5:30:45 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

lol!


46 posted on 05/13/2005 5:31:07 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry (Some stories have more spin cycles than my Kenmore washer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
It says that this battle over Saad has been going on since Bush, Sr. was President!

"The 6th Circuit squabble goes back to 1992, when Judge Saad was first nominated to the federal bench by Mr. Bush's father and blocked by committee Democrats."

47 posted on 05/13/2005 5:32:01 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
... and the less said about the child-porn ring, the better.

WHAT???? Harry Reid traffics in child porn????

Let's not spread this confirmed fact around.

48 posted on 05/13/2005 5:32:34 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

The GOP response should be:

"The gentleman from Nevada should be more careful about his characterizations of confidential information in FBI files. Having seen HIS file, we wonder how he ever got a security clearance. Of course, we can't elaborate on the shocking indiscretions revealed in his file."


49 posted on 05/13/2005 5:37:53 AM PDT by Timeout (Dean & the Bike Path Left: aging anti-warriors who use "summer" as a verb~~Jonah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
"The gentleman from Nevada should be more careful about his characterizations of confidential information in FBI files. Having seen HIS file, we wonder how he ever got a security clearance. Of course, we can't elaborate on the shocking indiscretions revealed in his file."

B I N G O ! ! !

50 posted on 05/13/2005 5:40:21 AM PDT by Iowa Granny (May require a Forklift soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; Mo1
Bill Bennett said this morning on his radio show that, in his opinion, Reid should be censured for doing this.

He should, but it won't happen. So long as we have a group of gutless Republicans pretending to be in the minority in Washington. Bennett is kidding himself.

51 posted on 05/13/2005 5:45:39 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Don't hate me because I'm a player)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I says in the article that supporters of Saad were not aware of this leak before now

Gee, how convenient. /s

52 posted on 05/13/2005 5:47:04 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Don't hate me because I'm a player)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"I'm not saying it's true and I won't say it isn't; but there's been talk!"
53 posted on 05/13/2005 5:49:02 AM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Thanks, Mo1. That was a big oops.


54 posted on 05/13/2005 5:49:28 AM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Personally, I found the part about the alleged sexual escapades with his pet golden retriever especially troubling.


55 posted on 05/13/2005 5:54:39 AM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
There's something here I don't understand AT ALL--can someone look at this and tell me what it looks like to you?

From the Times article:

Confidants of Judge Saad said yesterday that the judge would release the file but that he has never seen it, let alone obtained copies of it. Judge Saad is not permitted to see the file, Senate staffers said.

Can you be accused of somethingin an FBI report and NOT BE ALLOWED TO SEE IT nor CONTEST IT? Pardon the caps, but I'm completely amazed--I thought we were all allowed to see our own FBI files. How can you defend yourself against something you don't know exists?

56 posted on 05/13/2005 5:55:06 AM PDT by SoVaDPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

I searched the net high and low and cannot even find speculation of what might be in the FBI report. The notion that this info was already out there is just a smokescreen to cover Harry's indiscretion.


57 posted on 05/13/2005 5:58:24 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SoVaDPJ
How can you defend yourself against something you don't know exists?

You can't

I'm not sure of the proceedures

But if it's true that Saad has never seen it

Reid knew it when he said what he did ..

58 posted on 05/13/2005 5:58:36 AM PDT by Mo1 (Hey GOP ---- Not one Dime till Republicans grow a Spine !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SoVaDPJ; ohioWfan
Can you be accused of somethingin an FBI report and NOT BE ALLOWED TO SEE IT nor CONTEST IT? Pardon the caps, but I'm completely amazed--I thought we were all allowed to see our own FBI files. How can you defend yourself against something you don't know exists?

Ping for another example.

59 posted on 05/13/2005 5:59:16 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
"All you need to do is have a member go upstairs and look at his confidential report from the FBI, and I think we would all agree that there is a problem there," Mr. Reid continued.

The nominee must attend church on a regular basis.

What else would be so damning in the files to Sc-Reid?

60 posted on 05/13/2005 5:59:44 AM PDT by N. Theknow (What an appropriate name for the times in which we live - RAT-ZINGER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson