Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rebuffing Bush, 132 Mayors Embrace Kyoto Rules
NYT ^ | May 14, 2005 | ELI SANDERS

Posted on 05/13/2005 10:06:06 PM PDT by FairOpinion

SEATTLE, May 13 - Unsettled by a series of dry winters in this normally wet city, Mayor Greg Nickels has begun a nationwide effort to do something the Bush administration will not: carry out the Kyoto Protocol on global warming.

Mr. Nickels, a Democrat, says 131 other likeminded mayors have joined a bipartisan coalition to fight global warming on the local level, in an implicit rejection of the administration's policy.

The mayors, from cities as liberal as Los Angeles and as conservative as Hurst, Tex., represent nearly 29 million citizens in 35 states, according to Mayor Nickels's office. They are pledging to have their cities meet what would have been a binding requirement for the nation had the Bush administration not rejected the Kyoto Protocol: a reduction in heat-trapping gas emissions to levels 7 percent below those of 1990, by 2012.

On Thursday, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg brought New York City into the coalition, the latest Republican mayor to join.

Mr. Nickels said that to achieve the 7 percent reduction, Seattle was requiring cruise ships that dock in its bustling port to turn off their diesel engines while resupplying and to rely only on electric power provided by the city, a requirement that has forced some ships to retrofit. And by the end of this year the city's power utility, Seattle City Light, will be the only utility in the country with no net emissions of greenhouse gases, the mayor's office said.

Salt Lake City has become Utah's largest buyer of wind power in order to meet its reduction target. In New York, the Bloomberg administration is trying to reduce emissions from the municipal fleet by buying hybrid electric-gasoline-powered vehicles.

Nathan Mantua, assistant director of the Center for Science in the Earth System at the University of Washington, which estimates the impact of global warming on the Northwest, said the coalition's efforts were laudable, but probably of limited global impact.

"It is clearly a politically significant step in the right direction," Dr. Mantua said. "It may be an environmentally significant step for air quality in the cities that are going to do this, but for the global warming problem it is a baby step."

Mr. Nickels said he decided to act when the Kyoto Protocol took effect in February without the support of the United States, the world's largest producer of heat-trapping gases. On that day, he announced he would try to carry out the agreement himself, at least as far as Seattle was concerned, and called on other mayors to join him.

The coalition is not the first effort by local leaders to take up the initiative on climate change. California, under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, is moving to limit carbon dioxide emissions, and Gov. George A. Pataki of New York, also a Republican, has led efforts to reduce power plant emissions in the Northeast. But the coalition is unusual in its open embrace of an international agreement that the Bush administration has spurned, Mayor Nickels's office said, and is significant because cities are huge contributors to the nation's emission of heat-trapping gases.

Michele St. Martin, communications director for the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said the Kyoto Protocol would have resulted in a loss of five million jobs in the United States and could raise energy prices.

Ms. St. Martin said President Bush "favors an aggressive approach" on climate change, "one that fosters economic growth that will lead to new technology and innovation."

But many of the mayors said they were acting precisely out of concern for the economic vitality of their cities. Mr. Nickels, for example, pointed out that the dry winters and the steep decline projected in the glaciers of the Cascade range could affect Seattle's supply of drinking water and hydroelectric power.

The mayor of low-lying New Orleans, C. Ray Nagin, a Democrat, said he joined the coalition because a projected rise in sea levels "threatens the very existence of New Orleans."

In Hawaii, the mayor of Maui County, Alan Arakawa, a Republican, said he joined because he was frustrated by the administration's slowness to recognize the scientific consensus that climate change was happening because of human interference.

"I'm hoping it sends a message they really need to start looking at what's really happening in the real world," Mayor Arakawa said.

Mayor Nickels said it was no accident that most cities that had joined were in coastal states. The mayor of Alexandria, Va., is worried about increased flooding; mayors in Florida are worried about hurricanes.

But Mr. Nickels has also found supporters in the country's interior. Jerry Ryan, the Republican mayor of Bellevue, Neb., said he had signed on because of concerns about the effects of droughts on his farming community. Mr. Ryan described himself as a strong Bush supporter, but said he felt that the president's approach to global warming should be more like his approach to terrorism.

"You've got to ask, 'Is it remotely possible that there is a threat?' " he said. "If the answer is yes, you've got to act now."


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: climatechange; environment; govwatch; kingofcorruption; kyoto; lunacy; mayors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Begferdeth
Remember, ignoring problems makes them go away.

Not sure what you are saying. Instead of my guessing, how about elaborating a bit. Thanks.

41 posted on 05/13/2005 11:47:20 PM PDT by BJungNan (Check out http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE
Also.. the United States is the #1 Polluter? Yeah, right. I am guessing all those third world nations and china, russia, etc are as clean as the wind driven snow, right? heh.

Even the air at the underground curbside at Los Angeles International Airport is cleaner that what you find in China. I've stepped off the plane many times and take a big breath of air and thought, wow, how nice. Seriously.

The U.S. has the cleanest air of any country that I have traveled to. That we have the dirtiest air is a whole lot of nonsense.

42 posted on 05/13/2005 11:51:34 PM PDT by BJungNan (Check out http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug
Great. Let them shut down their own cities and show us how it's done.

We could help them along by filing a class action lawsuit for the failure to meet one Kyoto regulation or another. Anyone know a good one we could go at them with?

43 posted on 05/13/2005 11:53:49 PM PDT by BJungNan (Check out http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
Then let the citizens vote. They must be more intelligent than you idiots!

Don't bet on it.

44 posted on 05/13/2005 11:57:34 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"...had the Bush administration not rejected the Kyoto Protocol..."

And had the Clinton administration not rejected it -- and had the US Senate not rejected it.

Even the signatories to it at least have enough sanity to violate its senseless terms.

45 posted on 05/14/2005 1:29:09 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Too bad those ship just didn't decide to use another port.


46 posted on 05/14/2005 1:39:51 AM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

ALL OF YOU ARE BLASPHEMERS!!!!! HERETICS!!!!!!!!!

GLOBAL WARMING IS GOSPEL!!!!!

GLOBAL WARMING WILL KILL US ALL AND ITS ALL BUSH'S FAULT!!!!!!!


(oops, I seem to be channeling Howard Dean. Or maybe it's Al Gore.)

:-)



47 posted on 05/14/2005 1:53:15 AM PDT by kb2614 ("Speaking Truth to Power" - What idiots say when they want to sound profound!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
"Then let the citizens vote. They must be more intelligent than you idiots!"

"Don't bet on it."

I'll bet on it. Diverse groups generally outperform less diverse groups of individuals. And in this case, the less diverse group happens to be stupid and liberal.

48 posted on 05/14/2005 2:41:48 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I'd be interested to see the statistic on what percentage of the nation's greenhouse gases that would be cut if Kyoto were implemented are from these cities

I'm HOPING they're smart enough to know that their actions aren't going to cause a huge difference in greenhose gasses. I'm thinking they're mostly trying to score political points. After all it is all Bush's fault.

49 posted on 05/14/2005 3:01:38 AM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary

I am all for this. I have always lived in places with clean air, and I get irked at so-called enviornmentalists who live in LA and NYC making onerous rules for the rest of us. Let them clean up their own cities.


50 posted on 05/14/2005 3:01:44 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
Seattle IS attempting to provide "green" energy,

See this goes right along with our mandated green public buildings that cost more to maintain and keep people less comfortable.

51 posted on 05/14/2005 3:08:51 AM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
There are a number of methods for generating electricity that don't produce greenhouse gases.

Nuclear power...

52 posted on 05/14/2005 3:30:02 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
What does "net zero" mean ?

Low cost internet access - don't you read the ads.

53 posted on 05/14/2005 3:34:30 AM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

If they were REALLY concerned about so-called "greenhouse gasses" they would use nuclear power.

It produces none of those...


54 posted on 05/14/2005 3:40:50 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Bet you you're wrong.


55 posted on 05/14/2005 4:30:54 AM PDT by Archangelsk (Handbasket, hell. Get used to the concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I bet not a single one of them knows what's really in the Kyoto Treaty.

Someone should stick a mike in their faces and ask them.

On camera.

56 posted on 05/14/2005 4:32:31 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Kyoto is a hoax originating in Costa Rico to cover someones but for defrauding the CR government.
57 posted on 05/14/2005 4:50:21 AM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
Nope. The voters elected the mayors, didn't they?
58 posted on 05/14/2005 4:51:27 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
"Let them clean up their own cities."

Yes, it makes sense. Unfortunately, with liberals there's no guarantee that local laws won't end up being imposed on everyone, anyway.

Personally, I think most cities are so morally and culturally decayed that air quality should be rather low on the list of "improvements." But that's just me. :)

59 posted on 05/14/2005 4:52:29 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

the United States is the #1 Polluter?

Wrong, the #1 polluter in the world is China.


60 posted on 05/14/2005 4:54:54 AM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson