..nonetheless Spielberg is a bad example to toss in with Jane Fonda and Oliver Stone not to mention Armand Hammer and Soros...
Why? He made his fortune in the free enterprise system but has consistently supported its polar opposite, the socialist/liberal agenda. Spielberg's in good company with the four you named.
posted on 05/15/2005 4:02:50 PM PDT
Yeah with socialist movies like Raiders of the Lost Ark, E.T. Schindler's List, Saving Private Ryan. Come on. However if you're equating support for the the modern Democratic party with communism however then almost half the country is Communist. When I hear 'Communism' I think Lenin and Mao and their bnrethren. Not Adali Stevenson-stye liberals like Spielberg.
posted on 05/15/2005 4:06:44 PM PDT
He made his fortune in the free enterprise system but has consistently supported its polar opposite, the socialist/liberal agenda.
Spielberg made his reputation by making movies that appeal at the same time to both kids and adults, besides his more 'serious' work such as SHINDLER'S LIST. He's wrapped himself in the child-like aura of such classics as ET: THE EXTRATERESTRIAL, CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND and INDIANA JONES.
While I wouldn't call him a Communist I find it instructive that a person who's made a pile of cash selling his products to the kiddies would resign from his Executive position on the Board of the BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA in protest of the decision to deny homosexuals as Scoutmasters.
At least he's given a plain indication of his priorities: He favors Queers over children and wholesome organizations that would nurture them.
posted on 05/15/2005 5:23:27 PM PDT
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson