Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

That speck in your brother's eye (Interesting essay on liberal arrogance)
Triangle.com ^ | May 15, 2005 | J. PEDER ZANE

Posted on 05/16/2005 6:25:30 AM PDT by jalisco555

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Liberals have lost their ability to debate well. Their thought-leaders live in a world surrounded by people who agree with them. Any challenge to their world-view quickly reduces them to spluttering indignation. Intellectually bankrupt, they can do no more than throw pies and call their opponents idiots.
1 posted on 05/16/2005 6:25:30 AM PDT by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
And they toss sexual profanity at Ann Coulter as if that passes for reasoned thought!

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 05/16/2005 6:29:25 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555

I generally agree with this, but there is a TINY sliver of a point in Frank's screed. The point is that a lot (most?) self-professed GOP conservative politions give a lot of lip service to the demands of us social conservatives; in turn we vote for these politicians, and then, once elected, they seem to either forget our demands entirely or at best make only a token effort to enact them. These politicans (and this includes Dubya himself) better realize that we social conservatives are the ones who took the GOP to the dance, and they darn well better show us plenty of attention!!


3 posted on 05/16/2005 6:32:45 AM PDT by sawdust ("Justice Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it"--Pres. Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Not to mention Antonin Scalia.


4 posted on 05/16/2005 6:34:04 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sawdust

I agree.


5 posted on 05/16/2005 6:36:57 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sawdust

What you said.


6 posted on 05/16/2005 6:36:59 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555

Frank's lack of specific proposals underscores a common critique: that Democrats on the national level don't stand for anything. Yet he also reminds us that Democrats do stand for something quite far-reaching: the certitude of their own virtue in a wicked world.


7 posted on 05/16/2005 6:39:26 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555

I was just thinking the other day, how easy it is to see hypocrisy all around me. Keeps me from pondering and repenting.

Of course, casting stones is big business these days.


8 posted on 05/16/2005 6:40:34 AM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Democrats on the national level don't stand for anything

Or they darn well know what they do stand for will get them run out of office in any but the bluest regions of the blue states.

Hillary is leaning to the right for 2008, but her feet are still firmly planted on the left.

9 posted on 05/16/2005 6:46:01 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Relying on government for your retirement is like playing Russian roulette with an semi auto pistol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

I am looking forward to a Allen presidential run for just these reasons. The only drawback to it would be if he pussy-foots around about exposing hillary for what she is. In which case we will then have our heads handed to us by someone who shouldn't stand a chance to win.

Anybody got any suggestions on this one?


10 posted on 05/16/2005 6:46:04 AM PDT by TrailofTears ("A real father would hold the judge hostage and starve him to death.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sawdust
...we social conservatives are the ones who took the GOP to the dance, and they darn well better show us plenty of attention!!

Well Put.

Republicans need to understand that Conservatives vote Republican because Democrats vote Liberal.

If Democrats were to toss out every Liberal in their Party, and become a Party more Conservative than Republicans, the Republicans would lose a lot of their base support leaving only RINO's and "moderates".

Conservative first, Republican second.

11 posted on 05/16/2005 6:46:56 AM PDT by Noachian (To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sawdust

"These politicans (and this includes Dubya himself) better realize that we social conservatives are the ones who took the GOP to the dance, and they darn well better show us plenty of attention!!"

Not if senators McCain, Arlen and Hagel have anything to do with it.


12 posted on 05/16/2005 6:49:18 AM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TrailofTears
Anybody got any suggestions on this one?

Draft Cheney. He don't pussyfoot.

13 posted on 05/16/2005 6:49:28 AM PDT by Noachian (To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Frank T

"Not if senators McCain, Arlen and Hagel have anything to do with it."

Those guys are RINOs. No one should expect THEM to do any heavy lifting for social conservatives.



14 posted on 05/16/2005 6:51:17 AM PDT by sawdust ("Justice Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it"--Pres. Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

"Frank's lack of specific proposals underscores a common critique: that Democrats on the national level don't stand for anything."

They stand for the same thing they always have for most of our lifetime. That is, to enact a full welfare state. Most of them would be even happier to extend such a state on a global level, with the U.N. collecting taxes from countries like the US, and redistributing it elsewhere.

The Dems stripes haven't changed, just that their objectives aren't too popular right now, so they don't dare speak openly about it.

If there is one immediate task they would like to accomplish, it would be to "fix" the deficit and the economy. No, that doesn't mean cutting federal expenditures. Sound fiscal policy would mean raising taxes. The ever growing debt and widening deficit just might provide the national Dems with the chance to run with that plank in the next election. Too bad W doesn't like small government conservatism.


15 posted on 05/16/2005 6:54:27 AM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sawdust

"Those guys are RINOs. No one should expect THEM to do any heavy lifting for social conservatives."

Agreed. But they do seem to throw their weight around pretty good, and derail conservative reforms from passing.


16 posted on 05/16/2005 6:57:23 AM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Frank T

Only because "leader" Frist and the rest of the conservative GOP senate leadership (are you listening Rick Santorum) don't have the Nadz or ambition to shove them aside.


17 posted on 05/16/2005 7:00:46 AM PDT by sawdust ("Justice Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it"--Pres. Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
a key Democrat talking point: Why do so many working-class Americans vote against their own economic self-interest and support Republicans?

That this is a "key point" illustrates just how out of touch liberals are. They cannot grasp the fact that business creates jobs, and that to ensure continued success and prosperity, a business owner must treat his employees fairly.

18 posted on 05/16/2005 7:10:39 AM PDT by Marauder (Politicians use words the way a squid uses ink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marauder

The answer to the question "Why do those people vote against their self-interest?" is "They don't.". Don't expect the left to understand that, however.


19 posted on 05/16/2005 7:15:45 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Noachian
If Democrats were to toss out every Liberal in their Party, and become a Party more Conservative than Republicans

I dream of this day, and I believe that a nationwide grassroots movement to "toss the liberals out" would do a world of good for both parties: It would make the democRats a viable party again, and would definitely sober up the Republicans and make them toe the line. It could even bring back a government of, by, and for the people.

20 posted on 05/16/2005 7:17:51 AM PDT by Marauder (Politicians use words the way a squid uses ink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson