Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek Told Koran Flush Story Was 'Slam Dunk'
Scrapple Face ^ | 5/16/05 | Scott Ott

Posted on 05/16/2005 11:37:33 AM PDT by pookie18

An unnamed former top government official told a Newsweek magazine reporter that his story, about a U.S. military guard at Guantanamo prison flushing a Koran down a toilet, was "a slam dunk," according to the latest apology from Newsweek editor Mark Whitaker.

The magazine's uncorroborated, single-source, hearsay report of the Koran desecration sparked riots in several Muslim countries, killing at least 15 and injuring perhaps 100.

While the magazine has apologized publicly to the riot victims and their families, Mr. Whitaker told the New York Times, "We're not retracting anything. We don't know what the ultimate facts are."

For those unschooled in professional journalistic ethics, Mr. Whitaker explained that a retraction demands a higher standard of evidence than an ordinary news item.

"You don't just rush to press with a retraction until you nail down the facts," he added.

Newsweek reporter Michael Isikoff said his anonymous source is now unsure where he got the Koran-flushing information, which was broadcast across the Arab world by Al-Jazeera and others.

"If there's a bright side to this story," said Mr. Whitaker. "At least our anonymous sources are safe, unharmed. And of course, our advertisers now know that Newsweek has great credibility in the Arab world, despite the bad feelings that Muslims have about America in general."

In an effort to help in the grieving process, the magazine's publisher said that immediate family members of the dead would receive a free 90-day trial subscription to Newsweek.

"If they're done grieving after 90 days, they can write 'cancel' on the invoice and pay nothing," he said. "Otherwise we'll just bill their credit cards in three easy installments at a substantial savings off the newstand price."


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: c; checkthesource; itsajoke; satire; scrappleface; spikeystrikesagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 05/16/2005 11:37:37 AM PDT by pookie18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Yeah, but who got slammed?


2 posted on 05/16/2005 11:38:18 AM PDT by LIConFem (Mein Luftkissenboot ist mit Aalen voll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
For those unschooled in professional journalistic ethics, Mr. Whitaker explained that a retraction demands a higher standard of evidence than an ordinary news item.

LOL! That's good stuff.

3 posted on 05/16/2005 11:40:57 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

I am immediately suspicious of any article quoting "unnamed sources", and any news article citing unnamed sources is not credible, IMO.


4 posted on 05/16/2005 11:43:33 AM PDT by SaveTheChief (<insert clever, witty, or silly statement here>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

If the newsweak editors involved in this had any integrity whatsoever they would step down immediately instead of offering some half-assed apology that no one believes in the first place.


5 posted on 05/16/2005 11:43:40 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (The theory of evolution is the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century - Michael Denton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
Beautiful
6 posted on 05/16/2005 11:44:52 AM PDT by keat (Click to hear theme song)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Somehow I *knew* this was Scrappleface just by looking at the headline.

I wish I had Scott Ott's sense of satire.


7 posted on 05/16/2005 11:45:09 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
In an effort to help in the grieving process, the magazine's publisher said that immediate family members of the dead would receive a free 90-day trial subscription to Newsweek. "If they're done grieving after 90 days, they can write 'cancel' on the invoice and pay nothing," he said. "Otherwise we'll just bill their credit cards in three easy installments at a substantial savings off the newstand price."

Ouch! That's got to hurt, but probably doesn't. It's all too real.

8 posted on 05/16/2005 11:45:45 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Ouch!


9 posted on 05/16/2005 11:45:58 AM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
And of course, our advertisers now know that Newsweek has great credibility in the Arab world

Al Jazeerweek.

10 posted on 05/16/2005 11:46:10 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Be sure to forward this link to Newsweak so they don't miss it!


11 posted on 05/16/2005 11:46:39 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
Mr. Whitaker... We don't know what the ultimate facts are."

Too bad they didn't think of this before they published.

Yet, one more example of the MSM's numerous layers of editors and fact checkers, that the bloggers just don't have!

Anti-Bush, Anti-Americanism is all fun until they cause 16 people to be killed.

Maybe Newsweek will get lucky and this will kill democracy in the Middle East, that would be a great win for them.

/Sarcasm

12 posted on 05/16/2005 11:48:28 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

"An unnamed former top government official told a Newsweek magazine reporter that his story, about a U.S. military guard at Guantanamo prison flushing a Koran down a toilet, was "a slam dunk..."

unnamed former top government official = Howard Dean

Maybe newsweak should call that old cBS producer for advice...


13 posted on 05/16/2005 11:48:49 AM PDT by JeffersonRepublic.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
free 90-day trial subscription ...

...and a Newsweek visor to wear to the funeral.
14 posted on 05/16/2005 11:48:54 AM PDT by keat (Click to hear theme song)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Shut Newsweek down.


15 posted on 05/16/2005 11:49:11 AM PDT by ANGGAPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

OK, ya got me. I was 3/4 done before I realized the source.


16 posted on 05/16/2005 11:49:25 AM PDT by kallisti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

I like the Scrapple Face spin at the end. They always hook me before the reel me in. LOL!!!

In seriousness, I'd like to see Newsweek clean house over this. Killing people--gee that seems kinda bad, don't ya think?

It is clear their editorial staff consists of complete morons. Even the famous Isaicof (sp?) should have known better--A whole big book down a toilet?! ---Pleeeeeessse!!!!


17 posted on 05/16/2005 11:49:44 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("Sometimes you're windshield, sometimes you' re the bug")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
"You don't just rush to press with a retraction until you nail down the facts," he added.

LOL! Perfect.

18 posted on 05/16/2005 11:50:40 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

"You don't just rush to press with a retraction until you nail down the facts," he added."

Translation: "Let's go ahead and print it, then make THEM provide the facts."


19 posted on 05/16/2005 11:50:57 AM PDT by righttackle44 (The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Truce With Kings
Somehow I *knew* this was Scrappleface just by looking at the headline.

I wish I had Scott Ott's sense of satire.

Unfortunately, quite a few FReepers believe this to be real...

20 posted on 05/16/2005 11:51:58 AM PDT by pookie18 (Clinton Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson