Posted on 05/16/2005 6:04:44 PM PDT by ricks_place
The White House earlier Monday had called on Newsweek to retract its story as the Bush administration continued to deal with fallout from the anti-American protests in Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere.
The magazine's initial report, appearing in its May 9 edition, alleged that U.S. interrogators had flushed a copy of the Quran down a toilet, which incited widespread, week-long anti-American protests in Afghanistan and other Muslim countries, in which at least 15 civilians were killed and dozens more injured.
The magazine on Sunday acknowledged errors in its report and expressed regret for the violence that followed its publication, but stopped short of issuing a retraction.
Newsweek editor Mark Whitaker wrote an editor's note on the magazine's Web site in which he apologized for "possible errors" over the item in the magazine's Periscope section, saying it was based on an unnamed senior U.S. government official who now says he is uncertain whether the story is true.
"We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst," Whitaker said.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan on Monday said Newsweek's initial response was puzzling, saying the story had not met journalistic standards by relying on a single anonymous source "who could not personally substantiate the allegation that was made."
"The report has had serious consequences," McClellan said. "People have lost their lives. The image of the United States abroad has been damaged."
Following such criticism from the White House, Whitaker released a statement later Monday saying the magazine was retracting the story.
"Based on what we know now, we are retracting our original story that an internal military investigation had uncovered Quran abuse at Guantanamo Bay," Whitaker said, according to the Associated Press.
The article in question -- reported by Michael Isikoff, a veteran investigative reporter, and John Barry, a national security correspondent -- said military investigators had found evidence in an upcoming internal report by the U.S. Southern Command that American interrogators at the detention facility in Guantanamo had flushed a Quran down a toilet as a way to compel the detainees to talk. The report stems from a broader Southern Command investigation into allegations of prisoner abuse at the Guantanamo facility.
Whitaker said the original source now says he was not certain the alleged Quran incident appeared in the SouthCom investigation and that it might have been in other investigative documents or drafts.
At a time when news organizations are restricting the use of anonymous sources, Whitaker said the magazine had taken substantial steps to verify the accuracy of the report and that this confidential source had been reliable in the past, The New York Times reported Monday.
Before Newsweek decided to publish the report, Barry showed a draft of the article to the source and another Defense Department official for comment on its accuracy.
"One declined to give us a response; the other challenged another aspect of the story but did not dispute the Quran charge," Whitaker wrote in his editor's note. Whitaker said the magazine would have not published the report if the source had said the information was incorrect or asked the magazine not to go forward with it.
Pentagon spokesman Lawrence DiRita on Friday notified Newsweek that Pentagon investigators completed an internal review and found no credible evidence that the desecration of the Quran had occurred.
In a statement, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the original story was "demonstrably false" and "irresponsible," and "had significant consequences that reverberated throughout Muslim communities around the world."
"Unfortunately, they cannot retract the damage they have done to this nation or those that were viciously attacked by those false allegations," he said, reported the AP.
A Pentagon media relations guy is not going to step on that gottcha IED before sending it up the chain of command.
This is the MSM's Kent State.
What if it's true? Should we apologize? They chop off heads, we flush books.
NewsLeak is now quoting Al Jazeera as a source for previously reporting similar complaints by DETAINEES.
On CNN they reported that Newsweek was not the first to report this story?
This is the fact, that we are so upset over this book that really pisses me off.Sorry for my Language.
MSM=POS
So is Isikoff going to get Rathered?
As I stated last night, any plumber could have told Isikoff its impossible to flush a book, even a small book, down a terlet. The phoniness of this story was even more evident than a scalable font.
Samuel Clements
I think NEWSWEEK made a mistake and they want to be totally absolved. Therefore, I think they should be forgiven as soon as they are able to resurrect all those who were killed and after they are able to restore the image of the US they managed to damage (on purpose IMHO!).
Newsweek should be forced to identify the government employee who gave them this story. The "source" should be prosecuted for negligent manslaughter.
They don't say who they presented the story to at the Pentagon. Most likely it was another of their liberal leaker friends, not the person whose job it is to verify news articles.
That will never happen, though it should. I strongly urge anyone on this board who is subscribing to this tabloid to cancel immediately.

"Isikoff and Barry, you two are a couple of MEATHEADS!
Oh, and lest we also forget, turned crazed islamist murdering bastards into "insurgents" (warm and fuzzy freedom fighters).
Muslims riot over this yet Pi%$ Christ art is venerated by the left
OK - I'll say it: Isikoff and Barry deserve the death penalty.
Jeeze don't shoot the messenger, HANG their sorry traitorous asses..
Muslims are such children, dangerous children, but children none-the-less. There can't be any adults left in the world that actually read Newsweek as if it meant anything but fantasy and daydreams.
I sure hope so.
Much easier to flush certain news magazines.
So, Newsweek tried to verify the book flushing with a Defense Department official.
I can imagine that inquiry:
Newsweek reporter:
"General, are you willing to go on the record describing exactly what was or was not flushed down the toilets of the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay?"
General:
"You can't possibly be serious."
Newsweek reporter:
"So you don't deny the story! That's all the confirmation we need! ROLL PRESSES!!!"
Isn't that just like PBS? The report is only "flawed" -- not false or a lie, just "flawed."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.