Skip to comments.'Little Black Book' teaches kids 'gay' sex
Posted on 05/16/2005 10:18:25 PM PDT by scripter
click here to read article
Some folks have told me it's the most disgusting thing they've ever seen...
I'd say the best first step would be a supression of the Jesuit order!
David Parker appealed to the School Committee to allow him the right to be informed when his 6-year-old is exposed to these subjects by adults -- and to have the option to exclude him.Now read a letter from the Superintendent of Schools (Hurley) to Parker here. Apparently the school has no intention of offering an opt out.
OH. MY. GOD.
My best friends family is sending there kids first to a LCMS (Lutheran Church Missouri Synod) grade school and then to a Catholic high school (no Catholic grade schools). He is a lapsed Lutheran, she a lapsed Catholic.
Neither wanted their kids to go to what passes for public education these days.
Post 47 reads " Are the Catholics in Massachusetts liberal?"
Your reply to Post 47 was " They are C.I.N.O.'s. (Catholics-in-name-only)."
My point is that there are many good Catholics here in this state. The frustration we feel here is never ending. We are not all a bunch of CINOs.
"Speaking as a scientist - most scientists are against this sort of thing. "
I wish this were true ... I don't think so. Most have no opinion, many are delighted, and the rest of those who may actually disapprove ... they are silent.
This is why my hostility to scientists grows by the year. It is that total endorsement, via the silence, of the use of the scientific method to justify pushing this stuff on kids. It is wrong ... and I have a M.S. degree in one of the hard sciences myself.
GLSEN and Boston Public health and AIDS prevention are denying the existance of this book as being distributed to children. I can't find anything on the press conference by Article8, other than what they released to the press.
I called the school and the GLSEN in Boston and they categorically deny that this was ditributed, so what gives? Have we been duped?
Does anyone know anything other than what was published on the article 8 website? If this is real, it will be a solid blow to the "gay's" but if shown to be a fake, it will set back opposition to the gay movement. It's important that we get it right people!
If they weren't, the state probably wouldn't be in the condition it's been in for as long as it has.
Did you try telephoning or e-mail Article 8 Alliance.
I saw the book and it was not fake. (If someone faked it, they sure went to a LOT of trouble.)
What I was told was that it was distributed at a workshop at the school. My guess is that the school can say they did not distribute it because someone else did.
That's what I was thinking when I said the school might be playing word games, which we have already seen with the incident with Parker (the father who was arrested).
God out of school, gross, sickening and dangerous homosexual instructions in. Where are the damn parents and politicians allowing this to happen?!!!
UPDATE FROM A. 8:
Just what you'd expect:
Gays, organizers suddenly claiming that pornographic homosexual booklet wasn't at Brookline High School GLSEN conference Apr.30.
Strongly refuted by attendee who picked it up there (and Article 8 Alliance)!
"Of course the book was there! I picked mine up up on the Fenway Community Health Center table. There was a whole bunch of them on that table. It was the first table you got to after the registration table, when you went in."
Sally Turner, Carlisle, MA
"The people we saw each came home from the conference with a big bag of materials. And they all clearly had a copy of the book. It's ridiculous to claim that the book wasn't there.
Brian Camenker, Director, Article 8 Alliance
Statement from GLSEN-Boston, May 17:
Recent allegations from the far right on the one year anniversary of same sex marriage about the 2005 GLSEN Boston Conference are categorically untrue
Boston, MA (May 17, 2005)
The Boston Chapter of the Gay, Lesbian, & Straight Education Network, GLSEN Boston, wants to assure everyone that there were no sexually explicit materials at the conference. GLSEN Boston has a written and strongly enforced policy that no sexually explicit materials will be available or conversations engaged at the conference by presenters, staff, or others affiliated with GLSEN Boston. Sexually explicit materials of any kind are not permitted at the conference and would be in violation of clearly stated policy.
"We assign monitors to every workshop and event to assure that all policies are strictly enforced. No such materials, from AAC or anyone else, were ever present at the GLSEN conference in Brookline," said Sean Haley, E.D. of GLSEN Boston. "The allegations are simply lies."
GLSEN Boston works to ensure that all young people have access to a safe learning environment regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Article 8 reaction:
A common tactic for homosexual activists in the schools: to characterize anyone who exposes them or challenges them as "the far right" and to brush aside what they expose as "simply lies." Plus a lot of official-sounding blather boilerplate. Make no mistake, these are NOT lies. We have a witness who has stepped up. We have the books.
AIDS Action Committee:
A caller Tuesday afternoon spoke to an AIDS Action Committee (AAC) spokesman who identified himself as "Diego." Diego said that AAC definitely did not have a table at Brookline High School that day.
Article 8 reaction:
They're technically correct that AAC did not have a table there. But that's beside the point. Their "Little Black Book" was given out at the "Fenway Community Health Center" table. Somehow the Fenway Community Health Center received a large number of copies of the book, enough for a conference of hundreds of people.
Brookline High School:
The secretary to the headmaster, Carol Dyer, has been telling callers that she's been told that the book not given out, that nobody got them, and that these allegations are "not true". But when pressed, she also admits she doesn't know for sure.
Article 8 reaction:
Call Carol Dyer at 617-730-2401. She and the rest of them need to quit stonewalling and face this issue squarely. This is serious stuff, not a game.
Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health:
We were told Tuesday evening by a newspaper reporter that the Mass Dept. of Public Health claims it had nothing whatsoever to do with the book.
Article 8 reaction:
Then why is their name published in it as a contributor? Gov. Romney knows better, says he's going to get to the bottom of it. Besides, it's well known that the AIDS Action Committee and the Dept. of Public Health have had a very close working relationship for a long time.
Conclusion: The usual lies, deception, and subterfuge by gay activists and their supporters in the schools that unfortunately parents see over and over again. In Massachusetts, at least, the homosexual movement has a long history of simply making up statements to hide their activities with schoolchildren.
"Blame the ideologues, not the scientists."
Ok. I do blame the ideologues. But to deny the assent of your average run of the mill scientist by the reality they do not stand and visibily fight this .... even though the precious 'scientific method' underlies what kids are being taught in sex education classes ...
I sense that overlooking this assent is in accordance with an overall design.
It sure looks like that.
"Are the Catholics in Massachusetts liberal?"
you need to ask? they keep electing Kennedy - hypocrates this is why i left Mass.
How could we say, for example, not to place homosexual civil unions right along side traditional marriage in the social studies textbooks if the law does just that? If a community did insist that such things not be taught in the classroom, then some judge would probably issue an order compelling them to anyway.
This looks like the most likely scenario to me.
It just makes no sense to me to support oppose gay marriage, but support civil unions.
No, but subjectivism and nominalism reigns, so acceptance of this semantic sleight of hand isn't surprising.
Group: Explicit gay sex flier passed out at school
By Laura Crimaldi and ORyan Johnson
Wednesday, May 18, 2005 - Updated: 04:54 AM EST
An anti-gay marriage activist group claims a graphic safe-sex guide for adult gay men was distributed to students at Brookline High School last month.
Sean Haley of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, which sponsored the April 30 event, denied the claim. ``The allegations are simply lies,'' he said. ``We assign monitors to every workshop and event to assure that all policies are strictly enforced. No such material from AAC (Aids Action Committee, which produced the booklet) or anyone else were ever present.''
The booklet, ``Little Black Book: V 2. Queer in the 21st Century,'' which includes graphic instructions on how to safely perform gay sex acts, was described as ``vile and disgusting'' by Brian Camenker of the anti-gay marriage Article 8 Alliance, which claims it was given to students.
Sally Turner, a retired Carlisle mother, said she picked up the booklet at a table at Brookline High School set up by Fenway Community Health. ``I was quite horrified they were promoting homosexuality all the way down to the youngest grades,'' she said. Fenway Community Health officials could not be reached.
Brookline Superintendent William H. Lupini said GLSEN rented the high school for the event.
``We're going to investigate it,'' said Lupini, who said he has been assured the claim is false. ``If it happened, it's going to mean a lot of things for us. . . . We'll have to take appropriate steps in terms of safeguarding our facility.''
The booklet thanks the state Department of Public Health as a supporter. But Gov. Mitt Romney said yesterday the state did not fund the booklet, and denounced ``graphic pornographic material on the gay lifestyle'' in schools.
Meanwhile, AAC director Rebecca Haag said, ``This is a very targeted publication for gay men over 18 and it should not be misused. However, it is a very effective public health tool for preventing HIV and AIDS. . . . We never use sexually explicit materials (in the schools.)''
I wouldn't go that far. But you are right to an extent, there are angles to some WND stories, particularly if it has regards to education. You won't see WND print anything positive about something they have a political agenda against. I don't use the ACLU as my source for information about religion, an apostate Baptist as my source about Southern Baptists, or Planned Parenthood as a guide to abstinence.
I like Mr. Farah and agree with much of what he has to say. I do learn from him a lot. Nonetheless, especially after the finger story and this latest Newsweek fiasco (I still do NOT understand what the h--- they were thinking on that), I am not taking everything coming from the media as the absolute gospel truth. A local paper here once misreported on a story about a teacher and he got email and death threats because of it.
If this is true or if I see it firsthand, I will be in the forefront in fighting against it. Nonetheless, I won't apply it to everywhere and everybody or to use it as a further excuse to push a political agenda (unless I guess you include not allowing homosexual materials in places). The liberals already do that enough.
As for Art Bell, I have to wonder how he finds so many different end-of-the-world people.
Thanks for the updates.
I'm glad that Pope Benedict was chosen.
Good point. I do have to say, that it is not in our public school library, nor do I think that it will ever be. I have never heard of the book and hopefully will never see it. If I do, there will be a big book burning ceremony:).
Actually, they are, at least in many situations.
Thanks for the info. The only one I have seen anyplace was the Oliver Buttons one. I'll make sure to check for the content there and not allow it.
I have plenty of solutions, which include the one you said. One is to all work together to keep this stuff out and to see what we can all do to make a difference.
That's blasphemous. There should be some serious excommunicating going on over something like that.
I don't think it's a party thing. I'm beginning to believe that most politicians are closet liberals and whores by nature.
Romney has his sights set on the White House in 08,now does he?
Hah! It is for to laugh....
He better recognize!
Agreed.The first line of defense against this and other garbage being forced onto our kids is the strength of the family unit.Parents have to be proactive and absolutely insist that they,and they alone,reserve moral and spiritual license where their kids are concerned. If parents are lax and complacent in asserting their rights as to what their kids can & cannot be exposed to,this stuff will gain an ever stronger foothold and become the rule of the day.(God forbid,the whole country will become Massafornia!)
Some family ethics are timeless,and should remain so.
That said, for those of you left who care, here's what your schools ought to be teaching your children:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
I think everyone would agree with the point you both raise. Some parents are involved, some have no idea what's going on and some don't care.
I encourage you to read what happened to concerned parent David Parker. Mr Parker stated he wanted his son opted out of any homosexual teaching. The school played with him, twisted his words, and refused to cooperate. He was eventually arrested for trespassing when he wouldn't leave without an agreement to opt out his son.
As I see it, parents getting involved, parents getting proactive and insisting on reserving the right to discuss sexual issues with their children are wasting their time as David Parker found out. As the school his child attends thinks they know better, and are ignoring his request to opt out his son.
Watch the O'Reilly segment found at the above link.
"a Massachusetts father who recently protested a pro-homosexual book his 6-year-old son had been given in school spent a night in jail after being arrested by police "
Only in Mass.
By Franci Richardson Thursday, May 19, 2005 - Updated: 04:18 AM EST
The Fenway Community Health Center yesterday acknowledged its mistake in displaying a graphic safe-sex booklet for homosexuals at an event attended by middle- and high-schoolers at Brookline High.
``Fenway Community Health regrets accidentally making available a small number of copies of the `Little Black Book,' an HIV prevention publication for gay and bisexual men over the age of 18, at an event where young people were present,'' said Dr. Stephen Boswell, Fenway's president and CEO.
The superintendent of Brookline schools had asked the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Educational Network to follow policy banning the distribution of such material at the April 30 event.
``We thought we had laid out what were reasonable ground rules and that they weren't followed,'' Superintendent William Lupini said.
The Fenway employee in charge of the booth at the event did not realize the brochures, which depict gay sex practices, were on the table, Boswell said. http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=83764
Thanks for the update.
I don't believe for a moment that this was an ' accident '. These sick freaks should be thrown in jail. What charges would be brought against someone for showing these children pornography? Thats all this filth is - porno.
I can only hope the companies which supported this fiasco are notified.