Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
They didn't ask him if he knew any person or entity that received funds. Yes, he was asked in particular about his associate Fawaz Zuriekat. Galloway said he knew Zuriekat had much business in Iraq but Galloway claimed he didn't know anything about oil.

You are totally missing the point of the hearing. Did you not hear Galloway tell the Senators that HE told people Zuriekat not only had oli dealings in Iraq but "more than that" that he had ten times more dodgy business other than oil.

The point of the hearing was that NO-ONE has proof that Galloway took any illegal money, not that he had dodgy friends.

106 posted on 05/17/2005 4:06:55 PM PDT by cooper72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: cooper72
You are totally missing the point of the hearing.

No, I'm not, but you are.

Of course I heard Galloway. LOL

Now I really need to leave. Darn

111 posted on 05/17/2005 4:10:15 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: cooper72
The point of the hearing was

To grant Galloway the appearance he wanted.

He got it.

That and the laying out of evidence by the first panel.

But the Committee did not call Galloway so the point was not to wage their case right here and right now. And Galloway failed miserably in the fact department as time will tell.

128 posted on 05/17/2005 7:01:16 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson