Just as I seem ( to you) to be inferring that you don't despise Galloway, you seem to be implying that I seek to frame him-- Both counts are untrue.
Let the evidence tell us the truth.
I AGREE with you. And, honestly I don't care if we find he was on the take or not-- what does that ultimately prove? That only bribed agents of Saddam can have an anti-war, appeasing, anti-western point of view?
If that were true we wouldn't have the millions of moronic appeasers biting at our asses on a continual basis.
No, it is entirely possible to come to this brain-sick point of view all on one's own-- with no help from Saddam.
Whatever Galloway's motives are they are definitely complex.
I used to think Saddam was giving him money but if he did surely there would be lots of proof, and I thought he would go out of the limelight so no-one could get him.
However with Saddam now having NO power and obviously no money he has went MORE high-profile. Even though his political views are the opposite of mine, I strongly bellieve he does actually believe them strongly. That doesn't make them valid, but it does change things. He has always been hard-left.
In his younger days he walked side-by-side with IRA members, for that I have always despised him.