Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE SENATE THREAD: "Nuclear Wednesday" for judicial nominations: C-span 2 - 9:30 am EST
C-span 2 ^ | May 18, 2005

Posted on 05/18/2005 5:48:45 AM PDT by ken5050

Welcome, all you Freepers, to the continuing C-span soap operas about judicial nominations. "The Guiding SEARCHLIGHT, " "As the SENATE Turns, "One NOMINATION to Live" "GERIATRIC Hospital" (for all you Byrd and Lautenberg fans out there). Follow along with us, as the Dems raise the level of histrionics, bloviation, pontification, and all around bad acting to new highs, er, lows...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; allen2008; claudenovak; constitutionaloption; cspan; democratnukereaction; filibuster; georgeallen; may18th2005; reidsnuclearreaction; showdown; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 3,001-3,046 next last
The Senate is scheduled to convene at 9:30 am EST. If it's shown, pay attention to the opening prayer from the Senate Chaplin. Sometimes, on really big days, they add a little something "extra" to their "message"

BTW, for all my fellow political junkies out there, here's a little tidbit for you. It's said by many talking heads and pundits that only recently has the level of anger, indeed political bitterness, risen to such levels in Congress..well, here's a gem of an except ( and one of MY all time fav political quotes) from Sen William Borah (R-Idaho) from his speech on the Senate floor during the 1940 debate of FDR's Lend-Lease bill...

Borah was passionately against American involvement in the war in Europe, and was convinced FDR was secretly scheming to get the USA involved. He said that Lend-Lease, if passed "..will PLOW UNDER every FOURTH American boy.." As pure political vitriol, it's hard to top that...

For those of you old enough to remember the great American political novel of the 60's.... Alan Drury's "Advise and Consent"....( and, sadly, the lousy movie they made of it) during the interminable quorum calls and Dem rants, it might be fun to see which characters from the book and movie have present-day namesakes. My take so far..

Sen Seabright B. Cooley ( played brilliantly by Charles Laughton in the film...this is an easy one...Robert "Sheets" Byrd

Sen Fred(erica) van Ackerman..the hard left, Senate troublemaker, and the evil villian in the book.......Barbara Boxer...and..

yes folks..one of the characters in the book is a senator from Utah named......"Orrin" Knox...who knew?

I'll be in a meeting for a few hours..(darn it!!)..will rejoin you all about noon...Rush should be a blast today..

One suggestion for those who miss it live. C-span will most likely rerun the debate several times tonight. Their practice, fortuitously, in re-showing long Senate sessions..they cull all the quorum calls,the extranious fluff, and even those speeches that are boring..( can you say Lautenberg, and Jeffords..Hello?) So you can probably catch the good stuff...

So, what to expect today?

Frist is playing his card close to the vest, and rightly so. Keep the Dems off balance. The tone of the debate will be set in the opening remarks by both leaders. Will Reid continue to be nasty? It's expected that Frist will call up the nomination of Owens, and allow for 100 hours of debate, then invoke cloture, ( which ytakes 2 additional days) and if that fails, then move to change the rule. However, if the dems are really petty and obstructionist, he may well move for the rules change immediately.

What I'd love to see today..first thing..a warning shot across Reid's desk...have Cheney in the chair today as presiding officer... the Dems would go bananas..

Enjoy....

1 posted on 05/18/2005 5:48:46 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Live Thread Ping


2 posted on 05/18/2005 5:49:43 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; Howlin; EmilyGeiger; Bahbah; maggiefluffs; Congressman Billybob; ...

FYI..this is the place to be..please ping your lists, and apologies in advance if I missed anyone...


3 posted on 05/18/2005 5:51:02 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have kids ASAP to pass on her gene pool..any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Or as Schumer said yesterday: "Cheney,Cheney,Cheney,Cheney,".


4 posted on 05/18/2005 5:51:27 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Ken, thanks for the thread. I understand that today will be debate but we may not see any decisions before Friday. Let's hope things move forward and that those who are wrong are shown for who they really are.


5 posted on 05/18/2005 5:53:14 AM PDT by Unknown Freeper (Doing my part...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

Special "Swamp Fox" ping just for you...(g)


6 posted on 05/18/2005 5:53:28 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have kids ASAP to pass on her gene pool..any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; 1stMarylandRegiment; 1Mike; 3catsanadog; ~Vor~; ~Kim4VRWC's~; A CA Guy; ...

Here we go! (Maybe)


7 posted on 05/18/2005 5:53:50 AM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I don't believe anything will happen except the GOP RINOS caving to the dems and media hacks. The so called "nuclear option" will fail. With or without Cheney. We will have some GOP primaries to take care of this '06.


8 posted on 05/18/2005 5:53:52 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unknown Freeper

I've heard next tuesday at the earliest.


9 posted on 05/18/2005 5:55:07 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping, Howlin.

Let's GO!

10 posted on 05/18/2005 5:55:13 AM PDT by DCPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I just want to warn everyone in advance not to expect a quick result today. They are going to allow a day or two of debate on Pricilla Owen before they call for the vote. It may be early next week before the filibuster rule is actually eliminated.

Don't get frustrated -- Remember, Joe Six-pack will just be tuning in and we want them to see that the nominee is being fully debated (forget the fact that her nomination has been pending for 4 years.

Be patient!

11 posted on 05/18/2005 5:55:55 AM PDT by CWW (Mark Sanford for President on 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Thanks! Let's toast to the Reid et al being burnt TOAST.


12 posted on 05/18/2005 5:56:04 AM PDT by Carolinamom (Dem & RINO senators have "eaten on the insane root that takes the reason prisoner."---.Macbeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Senate President Cheney in the Chair - Yer nasty, ken.

I like the way you think.

13 posted on 05/18/2005 5:56:05 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

Let's not forgot a lot of the RINOs have had a recent hard slap (base closings)

A lot of the RINOs are starting to sweat. Info will be coming out on that IRS investigation.

We have more cards to play now.


14 posted on 05/18/2005 5:56:15 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken5050; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
Tuesday, May 17, 2005

The Senate convened at 9:45 a.m. and adjourned at 6:33 p.m. Three record votes were taken.

Next Senate meeting: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:30 a.m.: Proceed to Executive Session to begin consideration of the nomination of Priscilla Owen to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit.



LIVE THREAD PING!!!
15 posted on 05/18/2005 5:56:21 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I will check in later...need to run an errand. Nothing good will happen in the first cople of hours, IMHO. They will be feeling out the other side, jockeying for position, etc.

But then, what do I know? LOL!

16 posted on 05/18/2005 5:57:13 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Frist palns to allow 100 hours of debate...I hope he keeps the SDenenate in session very, very late..into the wee hours every day..and even through the weekend..He can play nasty also..BTW..doncha love my reference to Sheets as Seabright B. Cooley?


17 posted on 05/18/2005 5:57:22 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have kids ASAP to pass on her gene pool..any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thank you for the ping! I HOPE the republicans are ready to rumble!


18 posted on 05/18/2005 5:57:53 AM PDT by PilloryHillary (pilloryhillary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CWW

bttt


19 posted on 05/18/2005 5:58:06 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Good job. If they fail to act, then they actively fail.


20 posted on 05/18/2005 5:58:14 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
Be patient!

Bears repeating. I'm keeping my jets cool while this whole thing plays out.

21 posted on 05/18/2005 5:58:26 AM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
We need a drill and checklist of things to do around the house:

Laundry finished - check

Crockpot filled and cooking - check

Vacuuming done - check

Radio set to Rush - check...

22 posted on 05/18/2005 5:58:33 AM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA) Wisconsin Hunter Shootings: If you want on/off the WI Hunters ping list, please let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
have Cheney in the chair today as presiding officer..

You got a problem with me, Searchlight?

Thanks for the history lesson and for the thread. Very interesting!

23 posted on 05/18/2005 5:58:38 AM PDT by JustaCowgirl (The incidence of coincidence rises with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

HONK Honk beep beep ahhhOOOOOOgah-h-h-h , ...hey , we're all out here [in a hot rod] Waitin' , we're goin' fo'a RIIIde


24 posted on 05/18/2005 5:58:53 AM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

You all take good notes.....some of us have to go to work!....a ping to anything "unusual" will be appreciated.


25 posted on 05/18/2005 6:00:39 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Cancel your NEWSWEEK subscriptions. If you don't have one write their advertisers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary; All
Mr.Speeeeeeeeeaker.... Let the games begin! [music...]

History in the making :) - bring it on baby! :)

26 posted on 05/18/2005 6:00:50 AM PDT by ElPatriota (let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

PROGRAM -- (Senate - May 17, 2005)

[Page: S5369] GPO's PDF

---

Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President and Members of the Senate, tomorrow morning the Senate will begin consideration of the nomination of Priscilla Owen to be U.S. circuit court judge for the Fifth Circuit. We will debate the nomination throughout the day tomorrow. I encourage Members who wish to speak on the nomination to come to the Senate during tomorrow's session.

I talked to the Democrat leader about the structure of the debate, and he will accommodate Members who desire to make statements. I encourage Senators to contact cloakrooms if they would like to speak on the nomination. We look forward to the debate on Priscilla Owen, and we hope all of the Members will participate.


27 posted on 05/18/2005 6:02:10 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
*bump* Image hosted by Photobucket.com
28 posted on 05/18/2005 6:02:53 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry ("Harry Reid in stripes, I kinda like that image." -Tagline courtesy of DFU. Thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
have Cheney in the chair today as presiding officer...

Right you are ken.

29 posted on 05/18/2005 6:03:15 AM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaCowgirl

Thanks for the pic...


30 posted on 05/18/2005 6:03:20 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have kids ASAP to pass on her gene pool..any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage
"Time" has made "the people" angry. This was all started at a time when the Dems thought they could recover the White House and was merely a delay tactic. It's a Dem Plan gone bad.

I repeat: EVERY judge who has sat on the Supreme Court got there with a simple majority vote. The Filibuster was created as a blackmail tool for legislative matters not advise and consent matters.

31 posted on 05/18/2005 6:03:25 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

Please hold off on your singing the Blues until we see the whites of their eyes.


32 posted on 05/18/2005 6:03:29 AM PDT by Carolinamom (Dem & RINO senators have "eaten on the insane root that takes the reason prisoner."---.Macbeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

LOL! Last load in the wash as we speak!


33 posted on 05/18/2005 6:04:25 AM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA) Wisconsin Hunter Shootings: If you want on/off the WI Hunters ping list, please let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

C-span1
09:15 AM EDT
0:45 (est.) LIVE
Call-In
Senate Judicial Nominations Debates
C-SPAN, Washington Journal
Patrick J. Leahy , D-VT
Orrin Hatch , R-UT



34 posted on 05/18/2005 6:04:33 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith

;-)


35 posted on 05/18/2005 6:04:51 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry ("Harry Reid in stripes, I kinda like that image." -Tagline courtesy of DFU. Thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Judging by the latest rounds in the Senate, this could be incredibily B O R I N G.

But I have decided one thing: I want them to do it -- and I don't much care what anybody else says about it "on the TV." I don't care if it IS changing the rules.

They lie about Bush and us with wild abandon, so what does it matter? They will twist it however they twist it.


36 posted on 05/18/2005 6:05:06 AM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

This may be a keeper. Rolling tape (or hard drive) is probably a good idea. The media will surely spin this to show the GOP as the evil cretins they are.(not)


37 posted on 05/18/2005 6:05:38 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; ken5050; All
G'Mornin' all. All of us gathered up to watch the festivities? I'll be fine as soon as the coffee finishes brewing.

Nam Vet

38 posted on 05/18/2005 6:06:12 AM PDT by Nam Vet (MSM reporters think the MOIST dream they had the night before is a "reliable source".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nam Vet

I've already dumped my dogs at the groomers and am furiously folding clothes to pack for the beach next week!


39 posted on 05/18/2005 6:06:53 AM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Good morning, Ken, Carolinamom, Cboldt, Howlin, Sweet Caroline, AnniegetyourGun, and everyone!
Thanks for the thread, Ken and, do tell: what is the name of the lovely man who leads the Senate prayer? Isn't he also a fine baritone?
Cheers!


40 posted on 05/18/2005 6:07:22 AM PDT by katieanna (My Redeemer Liveth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I caught (from the other room) a FOX reporter who said, I think...

.."If you're waiting for the nuclear option today, you will be disappointed"...."It won't happen until next week".....??????

Anyone else hear this?

41 posted on 05/18/2005 6:07:34 AM PDT by Guenevere (Sola Gratia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Some background on Priscilla Owen for those not following the actual nominees closely...

Four-Year Injustice
Priscilla Owen deserves a vote.

By Senator John Cornyn

Four years ago today, President George W. Bush nominated Priscilla Owen to serve on the federal court of appeals. Justice Owen is an extraordinary Texan, an exceptional jurist, and a devoted public servant. Yet, after four years, she is still waiting for an up-or-down vote in the United States Senate. What's more, a partisan minority of senators now demands — for the first time in history — that she must be supported by a supermajority of 60 senators, rather than the constitutional rule and Senate tradition of majority vote. After four years, it is long past time to restore sanity and Senate tradition to our judicial confirmation process.

I know Priscilla personally, because we served together on the Texas supreme court. Throughout her life, she has excelled in virtually everything she has ever done. She was a law-review editor, a top graduate from Baylor Law School at the remarkable age of 23, and the top scorer on the Texas bar exam. She entered the legal profession at a time when relatively few women did, and after a distinguished record in private practice, she reached the pinnacle of the Texas bar — a seat on the Texas supreme court. She was supported by a larger percentage of Texans than any of her colleagues during her last election, after enjoying the endorsement of every major Texas newspaper.

Unsurprisingly, then, the American Bar Association, after careful study, unanimously rated her well qualified to serve on the federal bench — their highest rating.

Unsurprisingly, she enjoys the enthusiastic support of a bipartisan majority of senators.

Yet a partisan minority of senators now insists that Owen may not be confirmed without the support of a supermajority of 60 senators — a demand that is, by their own admission, wholly unprecedented in Senate history. Why? Simple: The case for opposing her is so weak that changing the rules is the only way they can defeat her nomination.

What's more, they know it, too. Before her nomination became caught up in partisan special-interest politics, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee predicted that Owen would be swiftly confirmed. On the day of the announcement of the first group of nominees, including Owen, he said he was "encouraged" and that "I know them well enough that I would assume they'll go through all right." Indeed, just a few weeks ago, the Minority Leader announced that Senate Democrats would give Justice Owen an up-or-down vote — albeit only if Republicans agreed to deny the same courtesy to other nominees.

These concessions are understandable, because the case against Owen is unconvincing. For example, Owen is accused of ruling against injured workers, employment discrimination plaintiffs, and other sympathetic parties on a variety of occasions. Never mind, however, that good judges like Justice Owen do their best to follow the law, regardless of which party will win and which will lose. Never mind that many of her criticized rulings were unanimous or near-unanimous decisions of the Texas Supreme Court. Never mind that many of these rulings simply followed federal precedents authored and agreed to even by appointees of Presidents Clinton and Carter, or by other federal judges unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate. Never mind that judges often disagree — especially when a law is ambiguous and requires careful and difficult interpretation.

Justice Owen is also criticized for enforcing a popular Texas law generally requiring parental notification before a minor can obtain an abortion. Her opponents allege that, in one parental-notification case, then-Justice Alberto Gonzales accused her of "judicial activism."

This charge is unpersuasive for at least two reasons. First, judges disagree all the time — that's why we have multi-member courts. U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens once accused Justice Byron White of "judicial activism," while in another opinion he accused Justice Lewis Powell and Sandra Day O'Connor of "judicial activism."

But second, and more importantly, Gonzales did not accuse Owen of judicial activism. Not once did he say that "Justice Owen is guilty of judicial activism." To the contrary, Gonzales never even mentioned her ruling. And he has since testified under oath that he never accused Owen of any such thing. What's more, the author of the parental notification law supports Owen — as does the pro-choice Democrat law professor who was appointed to the Texas supreme court's Advisory Committee to implement that law. In her words, Owen simply "did what good appellate judges do every day. . . . If this is activism, then any judicial interpretation of a statute's terms is judicial activism."

The American people know a controversial ruling when they see one — whether it's the redefinition of marriage, or the expulsion of the Pledge of Allegiance and other expressions of faith from the public square — whether it's the elimination of the three-strikes-and-you're out law and other penalties against convicted criminals, or the forced removal of military recruiters from college campuses. Owen's rulings fall nowhere near this category of cases. There is a world of difference between struggling to interpret the ambiguous expressions of a legislature, and refusing to obey a legislature's directives altogether.

The Senate judicial confirmation process has been at times emotional and politically divisive, and that is unfortunate. But all Americans of good faith should at least agree that we need a fair process for selecting judges — with full investigation, full questioning, full debate, and then an up-or-down vote. And all Americans should agree that, although nobody likes to lose, the rules should always be the same, regardless of whether the president is Republican or Democrat. Throughout our nation's more than 200-year history, the constitutional rule and Senate tradition for confirming judges has been majority vote. senators should uphold and restore that tradition — and giving Owen an up-or-down vote, after four years of delay, would be an excellent start.

The Honorable John Cornyn is an U.S. senator from Texas and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He served previously as Texas attorney general and state supreme court justice.

42 posted on 05/18/2005 6:07:40 AM PDT by RobFromGa (Enact Constitutional Option Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

The Dems have painted themselves in a real corner. They never thought the GOP would call their bluff, and now they have no way out. Their base would cruicify them. THis is a kamikaze mission for Reid, and BTW, affter the 2006 election, when the GOP gains again in both houses..look for Reid and Pelosi to get tossed overboard by their caucuses..Also, when the 7 finally do get an up-or-down vote...many will get 60+ in favor..


43 posted on 05/18/2005 6:08:22 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have kids ASAP to pass on her gene pool..any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Thanks for the thread.


44 posted on 05/18/2005 6:08:57 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democrat Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

sleuth on here, also!

I have cleared my rather boring calendar today!!!!

Let's get ready to rumble!!!!!


45 posted on 05/18/2005 6:09:15 AM PDT by Txsleuth ( Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: katieanna; OXENinFLA

He's a former US Navy chaplin..OXen will know.


46 posted on 05/18/2005 6:09:39 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have kids ASAP to pass on her gene pool..any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Was anyone aware of this repeal of Clintons tax increase on SS benefits? The media was silent on this.

S.AMDT.241
Amends: S.CON.RES.18
Sponsor: Sen Bunning, Jim [KY] (submitted 3/17/2005) (proposed 3/17/2005)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
To repeal the 1993 tax increase on Social Security benefits.

TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S3078

STATUS:

3/17/2005:
Amendment SA 241 proposed by Senator Bunning. (consideration: CR S2914-2915, S2933; text: CR S2914)
3/17/2005:
Amendment SA 241 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 55 - 45. Record Vote Number: 74.


47 posted on 05/18/2005 6:10:02 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Sorry...forgot to ping you..regards


48 posted on 05/18/2005 6:10:13 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have kids ASAP to pass on her gene pool..any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

That report is probably accurate. Remember that no vote is taken until after many hours of debate. Emphasis on "many". If Frist calls for 30 hours of debate on Owen, that means there will be no vote until Monday afternoon.


49 posted on 05/18/2005 6:10:29 AM PDT by katieanna (My Redeemer Liveth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: All
It still sits in my head: Schumer said: "Then, we will stop them "ALL" in Committee."

I think they have to have one Dem say OK to get them out of Committee.

50 posted on 05/18/2005 6:10:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 3,001-3,046 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson