Skip to comments.
CBS Cancels Wednesday '60 Minutes'
Yahoo News ^
| May 18, 2005
| DAVID BAUDER
Posted on 05/18/2005 9:10:58 AM PDT by blogblogginaway
NEW YORK - CBS said Wednesday it is cancelling the Wednesday edition of "60 Minutes," insisting the decision was made because of poor ratings and not last fall's ill-fated story about President Bush's military service
Dan Rather, the newsmagazine's lead correspondent, will contribute stories to the Sunday edition of "60 Minutes," said CBS Chairman Leslie Moonves.
"This was a ratings call, not a content call," Moonves said Wednesday.
The newsmagazine spinoff was where Rather reported last September that Bush skirted some duty while in the Texas Air National Guard and a commander felt pressure to sugarcoat an evaluation of him. An independent panel later concluded that documents used in the story could not be verified.
Moonves said that story didn't figure in the decision to cancel it, "not even slightly."
"60 Minutes" Wednesday has been sinking in the ratings, a decline accelerated by the success of the ABC drama "Lost" in the same time slot. The show also has one of the oldest audiences in prime-time television, considered a turn-off to advertisers.
Moonves said CBS News President Andrew Heyward was telling his staff of the decision on Wednesday and it was too soon to tell if any layoffs will result.
CBS will likely run news specials during the year in prime-time, he said.
The show was Rather's home base since he stepped down as anchor of the "CBS Evening News" in March. While he will report for "60 Minutes," it's not clear whether he will become one of the correspondents pictured every week at the beginning of the show.
TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; cbs; cnn; couricnext; danrather; easonjordan; halperin; heyward; isikoff; moonves; msmbias; msnbcgone; newsweek; ratherfallout; rathergate; seebsnews; tang
To: blogblogginaway
Woo Hoo! Now, if only they'd cancel Katie.
2
posted on
05/18/2005 9:11:43 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: blogblogginaway
I'm curious how the ratings went after Memogate. If anyone has the data they should post it.
To: blogblogginaway
Why are your federal tax dollars being used to pay the ACLU to bring frivolous lawsuits against you.</p>
Your tax dollars pay their attorney fees.
It's time to repeal the law.
Check it out.
4
posted on
05/18/2005 9:12:46 AM PDT
by
OKIEDOC
(LL THE)
To: blogblogginaway
Boo Hoo - Poor Dan. And he just got a Peabody Award for trashing our efforts in Iraq (Abu Gharaib). Shows what the awards really mean. Wonder where Dan will hang out now?
5
posted on
05/18/2005 9:12:57 AM PDT
by
drt1
To: blogblogginaway
"This was a ratings call, not a content call," Moonves said Wednesday. Can't they see that their ratings are due to their content?
6
posted on
05/18/2005 9:13:06 AM PDT
by
Pest
(My reality check bounced!)
I wonder what they're saying at DU about this....
7
posted on
05/18/2005 9:13:28 AM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: mtbopfuyn
Oh too bad...it couldn't possibly be because people have stopped watching...just like the movies that can't get good numbers...its not because people are tired of the "Hollywood" political party.
8
posted on
05/18/2005 9:13:35 AM PDT
by
CIDKauf
(No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.)
To: blogblogginaway
Dan Rather, the newsmagazine's lead correspondent, will contribute stories to the Sunday edition of "60 Minutes," said CBS Chairman Leslie Moonves.They just can't bring themselves to cut their ties with this a$$clown. Rather is definitely still an "anchor".
To: blogblogginaway
LOL is that show still on the air ?!?
man I haven't watched network news in like a decade !
10
posted on
05/18/2005 9:14:09 AM PDT
by
Nyboe
To: blogblogginaway
Of course, poor content and a retracted story pushed the ratings further down, but there is no linkage. Wonder what Dan-o's gonna do now?
11
posted on
05/18/2005 9:14:14 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(The Dems are putting all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
To: blogblogginaway
oopsie~! there goes Dan Rathers new assignment
12
posted on
05/18/2005 9:14:32 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: mtbopfuyn
13
posted on
05/18/2005 9:16:00 AM PDT
by
CGVet58
(God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
To: blogblogginaway
"This was a ratings call, not a content call," Moonves said Wednesday.Like the two aren't related, brain trust.
14
posted on
05/18/2005 9:16:09 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Don't kid yourself. I'll be very surprised if he sees any more airtime. This is a gently inserted dagger by the master of this art, Moonves. Buh Bye Dan!
15
posted on
05/18/2005 9:17:19 AM PDT
by
drt1
To: blogblogginaway
16
posted on
05/18/2005 9:22:11 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Give Byrd the Byrd option now.)
To: CGVet58
17
posted on
05/18/2005 9:29:37 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: RandallFlagg
They'll miss the show that, like the Natl. Guard memos, was "Fake, But Accurate"
To: RandallFlagg
"I wonder what they're saying at DU about this..."
HALIBURTON HALIBURTON HALIBURTON.. Bush Lied about WMD, Ashcroft is a Nazi... The usual.
19
posted on
05/18/2005 9:34:03 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
To: EQAndyBuzz
I love watching the heroes of the left implode -then watching them cry.
20
posted on
05/18/2005 9:34:54 AM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: mewzilla
The ratings are a content call made by the viewers, not by squish-headed network managers.
21
posted on
05/18/2005 9:37:58 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: blogblogginaway
....was where Rather reported last September that Bush skirted some duty while in the Texas Air National Guard and a commander felt pressure to sugarcoat an evaluation of him. An independent panel later concluded that documents used in the story could not be verified. How do you like that phrasing? How about:
...where Dan Rather and 60 Minutes used forged documents to undermine and influence an American election in favor of John Kerry. Although an independent panel would not conclude the documents were forged, their authenticity was immediately questioned by BuckHead, one of the many pajama clad patrollers keeping an eye on the MSM today."
22
posted on
05/18/2005 9:46:22 AM PDT
by
capydick
("The current tax code is a daily mugging." --Ronald Reagan)
To: blogblogginaway
I guess the 'decent interval' has finally expired. They must drop the 'Other Shoe' from a fantastic height.
23
posted on
05/18/2005 9:53:58 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
To: blogblogginaway
Another one bites the dust . . .
24
posted on
05/18/2005 10:12:32 AM PDT
by
cvq3842
To: blogblogginaway
Ah, ah, ah, AH CHOO!
To: blogblogginaway; martin_fierro; geedee
Moonves, STH up....nobody belives a single word out of your self-serving, lying mouth.
Longtime 60 Minutes honcho Dan Hewitt (now retired) was never shy about brainwashing audiences, for his own political purposes.
Hewitt put the lying Clintons on and launched their presidential candidacy.
Savvy viewers knew they were lying, and years later in his autobio Hewitt admitted he knew the Clintons were lying, but put them on anyway.
Scumbag.
26
posted on
05/18/2005 10:47:25 AM PDT
by
Liz
(A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
To: OKIEDOC
Why are your federal tax dollars being used to pay the ACLU to bring frivolous lawsuits against you. Uhhhh....what?
Wrong thread, maybe?
27
posted on
05/18/2005 10:52:21 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: blogblogginaway
Now, if they would only cancel SeeB.S. completely, we'd be in the good.
28
posted on
05/18/2005 10:57:56 AM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(Search and Destroy socialist democrats & their leaders Fat Ted, F'n Kerry & the Beast!)
To: blogblogginaway

Not with a bang but with a...
29
posted on
05/18/2005 11:09:47 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Nyboe
"man I haven't watched network news in like a decade !"
And I can't tell you if you've missed anything!
30
posted on
05/18/2005 1:22:35 PM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(A source of alternative energy; windmills in front of liberals mouths.)
To: Izzy Dunne
No
Just asking every time I make a post if people know that your federal tax dollars are being used to pay the ACLU attorney fees.
This is outrages and should be stopped.
The question is to big and important for a tag line.
31
posted on
05/19/2005 10:09:27 AM PDT
by
OKIEDOC
(LL THE)
To: blogblogginaway
An independent panel later concluded that documents used in the story could not be verified. This is liberal speak for :
An independent panel later concluded that documents used in the story were forged.
The press has no difficulty calling the Niger documents 'forgeries' after being identified as such by a French IAEA staffer but can't seem to bring themselves to admit the CBS documents were forgeries as well. Nor are they too interested in who forged them or who paid for the forgeries.
32
posted on
05/19/2005 6:08:26 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: blogblogginaway
NEW YORK - CBS said Wednesday it is cancelling the Wednesday edition of "60 Minutes," insisting the decision was made because of poor ratings and not last fall's ill-fated story about President Bush's military service One is not necessarily unrelated to the other.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson