Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors of Death: Kaiser Solicits Its Doctors to Kill
National Review Online ^ | August 19, 2002 | Wesley J. Smith

Posted on 05/22/2005 12:27:00 PM PDT by STD

When liberals ask me why they should oppose physician-assisted suicide (PAS), I always reply, "I can summarize a big reason in just three letters: HMO."

That always raises an eyebrow. Liberals hate HMOs.

Then I ask, "Do you know how much it costs for the drugs used in an assisted suicide?" They usually shake their heads, no. Answering my own question, I say, "About forty bucks," adding, "Since HMOs make money by cutting costs, and it could cost $40,000 (or more) to provide suicidal patients with proper care so that they don't want assisted suicide, the economic force of gravity is obvious." More often than not, my liberal interlocutor will say, "Gee, I never thought about that before," and agree that the HMO factor is a very serious problem confronting the assisted-suicide movement.

Most people haven't yet made the money connection between assisted suicide and the increasing strains on health-care budgets. That may be because reporters, who are usually eager to expose potential financial conflicts of interest in other public-policy issues, tend to be blind to the economic stakes involved in the assisted-suicide controversy. They prefer to see it as a matter of "choice," or of "compassion," or of modernism-versus-religion. Yet, the realization that assisted suicide will, in the end, be largely about money, is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Take Oregon, where assisted suicide is legal. While the assisted-suicide law does not compel any doctor or HMO to participate in the self-destruction of patients, only Catholic HMOs have said no. Indeed, Kaiser/Permanente Northwest's doctors are known to have written lethal prescriptions under the Oregon law.

But now, Kaiser isn't merely permitting doctors to assist in patient suicides, it is actively soliciting its doctors to participate in the deadly practice. As revealed by the anti-assisted-suicide medical group Physicians for Compassionate Care, a Kaiser executive recently e-mailed a memo to more than 800 Kaiser doctors soliciting PAS-doctor volunteers.

The memo reveals that to the apparent chagrin of Kaiser, to their credit, few plan doctors are willing to participate in the killing of their own patients. Hence, the executive urges any Kaiser doctor willing to "act as Attending Physician under the [assisted suicide] law for YOUR patients" and doctors "willing to act as "Attending Physician under the law for members who ARE NOT your patients" to contact "Marcia L. Liberson or Robert H. Richardson, MD, KPNW Ethics Services." (Emphasis in the memo.) Since "attending physicians" write the lethal prescriptions under the Oregon law, Kaiser is apparently willing to permit its doctors to write lethal prescriptions for patients they have not treated.

For opponents of assisted suicide who are closely following events in Oregon, Robert Richardson is already notorious as the HMO administrator who green-lighted the assisted suicide of Kate Cheney. Cheney, as reported by the Oregonian, was a terminal cancer patient who was probably suffering from dementia when she asked for a lethal prescription, raising serious and significant questions about her mental competence. Rather than prescribe lethal drugs, her doctor referred her to a psychiatrist who reported that "she does not seem to be explicitly pushing for this." He also determined that she did not have the "very high capacity required to weigh options about assisted suicide." Accordingly, the psychiatrist nixed the lethal prescription.

Advocates of legalized assisted suicide might, at this point, smile happily and say that this is the way the law is supposed to operate: a vulnerable and perhaps incompetent woman's life had been protected. But proving that "protective guidelines" don't really protect, that wasn't the end of Cheney's story. Her daughter insisted that Kaiser permit another psychiatric opinion. Kaiser agreed to the request.

This time, the consultation was a clinical psychologist rather than an M.D. psychiatrist. Like the first report, the psychologist found that Cheney had significant memory problems. For example, she could not recall when she had been diagnosed with terminal cancer. The psychologist also worried that Cheney decision to die "may be influenced by her family's wishes." Still, despite these reservations, the psychologist determined that Cheney was competent to commit suicide.

The final decision to approve the assisted suicide was made by Richardson. Despite two mental-health professionals significant concerns about Cheney's mental state and the potential that familial pressure was involved in her decision, after he interviewed Cheney, Richardson approved the writing of a lethal prescription.

It is worth noting that Cheney did not take the poison pills right away. Her assisted suicide took place only after she was sent to a nursing home for a week. Tellingly, she took the pills on the very day of her return home. No doctor was present. Nor was her mental status assessed at that time. That is because under the Oregon law, once the prescription is written, death doctors need have no more to do with the suicidal patient.

When the Cheney case became public, Richardson angrily claimed that his decision had nothing to do with money. And, to be fair, there is no doubt that if the relatively few people reported as committing assisted suicide so far in Oregon is correct, Kaiser and other participating HMOs have not yet saved a great deal of money by agreeing to facilitate the assisted suicides of their terminally ill members. But if the reluctance of good doctors such as those currently refusing to participate in-patient self-killing at Kaiser is ever overcome, the financial facts could change. Indeed, if assisted suicide ever became nationalized and a routine "medical treatment," significant money could be saved — and hence made — by the HMO industry from the hastened deaths of their patients.

This is the view of none other than assisted-suicide guru, Derek Humphry, cofounder of the Hemlock Society and a heavy lifter in support of the Oregon law. Humphry now claims that money is the "unspoken argument" in favor of legalizing assisted suicide. Specifically, in his most recent book Freedom to Die, co-authored with Mary Clement, the authors write that "the hastened demise of people with only a short time to left would free resources for others," an amount they predict could run into the "hundreds of billions of dollars." Moreover, the authors claim that "economic necessity" is the ultimate force driving the assisted-suicide movement, to the point that it "is the main answer to the question [about legalizing PAS], 'Why Now?'"

Logic is certainly on their side. With the advent of managed care, profits in health care increasingly come from cutting costs. With assisted suicides costing such little money, what "treatment" could be more cost effective than assisted suicide? And since it is a well-known human failing that our values often follow our pocketbooks, ignoring the significant financial stakes involved in the assisted-suicide debate is to overlook a crucial part of the story.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: assistedsuicide; cary; euthanasia; healthcare; hmo; hmos; kaiser; socializedmedicine

1 posted on 05/22/2005 12:27:01 PM PDT by STD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STD
"the hastened demise of people with only a short time to left would free resources for others," an amount they predict could run into the "hundreds of billions of dollars."

Not necessairily. If "hundreds of billions of dollars" are saved because people are being terminated, those "hundreds of billions of dollars" will be redirected to other important social needs, like housing for the homeless, education for illegal aliens, or pay raises for politicians.

2 posted on 05/22/2005 12:43:42 PM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD

I've never understood why liberals hate HMOs but love government health care. What exactly do they think the difference in care will be?


3 posted on 05/22/2005 1:23:50 PM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative cat
It's obvious liberals are HYPOCRITES. They don't want to have to go to HMO's.
4 posted on 05/22/2005 1:26:49 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

I took my son to Kaiser in DC for a follow up with a pediatric specialist. A young female doctor struck up a conversation with my son. She engaged him, she was charming, she was funny. Later while waiting at the reception I heard somebody mention that she was new and what was she doing here. "Abortions" she said. Just like that "Abortions". The hairs still stand up on the back of my neck when I remember.


5 posted on 05/22/2005 1:41:57 PM PDT by lmc12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservative cat
I've never understood why liberals hate HMOs but love government health care.

Kaiser is an HMO, and is very, very liberal. I know, because my father worked for them until retirement. And the Kaiser Family Foundation is about as socialist as you can get.....

I had Kaiser coverage from birth, but after they screwed up surgery on my foot after a climbing accident when I was in High School, I never returned. It has been private doctors ever since. You get what you pay for....

6 posted on 05/22/2005 1:46:24 PM PDT by BullDog108 ("Conservatives believe in God. Liberals think they are God." ---Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STD
Robert Richardson is already notorious as the HMO administrator who green-lighted the assisted suicide of Kate Cheney.

I wonder if he authorized Kaiser to lower her monthly premiums at that point? It would have only been fair...sarcasm/off
7 posted on 05/22/2005 2:13:49 PM PDT by Nathan Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmc12

Sort of spooky and ironic!


8 posted on 05/22/2005 3:17:00 PM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: STD
"Liberals hate HMOs."

Really? Aren't they Teddy Kennedy's legislative creation?
9 posted on 05/22/2005 3:35:37 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (You're it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD; floriduh voter

Bookmarked.


10 posted on 05/22/2005 3:37:59 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("We, the people, are the...masters of...the courts..." -Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD; EternalVigilance; russesjunjee

How much time any one has left is subjective, an unknown quantity. Who decides when & who to kill? Judges of course or committees like they had in Nazi Germany.


11 posted on 05/22/2005 3:45:16 PM PDT by floriduh voter (www.terrisfight.org & www.theemppirejournal.com... The Schindlers "Never again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; amdgmary; PhilDragoo; Future Useless Eater

Ping. Wesley Smith


12 posted on 05/22/2005 3:46:18 PM PDT by floriduh voter (www.terrisfight.org & www.theemppirejournal.com... The Schindlers "Never again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lesforlife; STARWISE

Ping to Wesley Smith


13 posted on 05/22/2005 3:47:20 PM PDT by floriduh voter (www.terrisfight.org & www.theemppirejournal.com... The Schindlers "Never again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NYer; nickcarraway; sweetliberty; wildandcrazyrussian; Jude21

Ping.


14 posted on 05/22/2005 3:48:17 PM PDT by floriduh voter (www.terrisfight.org & www.theemppirejournal.com... The Schindlers "Never again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: STD

Actually I'm in favor of assisted suicide for politicians.


15 posted on 05/22/2005 3:57:36 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BullDog108
...."You Get What You Pay For".....

WHY Is It, that in ANY OTHER "Field of Endeavor," we seem to Understand this Fact;--Yet, when it comes to "Medical Care," we simply CANNOT ungerstand that "Supply & Demand" STILL APPLIES!!

There exists a HUGH proportion of "Medical Care" which is Done, "Gratis;" but the Costs Remain. The "HMO's" calculate EVERY LAST PENNY of Their "Overhead."

The "Doc's" bill for Their "Services," but they Also "Treat the Indigent--'Gratis'".

No One "Reimburses the 'Doc's" for their Free Care.

At a Guess, I would estimate that 15-20% of Medical Care is Delivered FREE-OF=CHARGE!!

WHO PAYS FOR THIS "FREE CARE??"---NO One;== the 'Doc's do the care, "Gratis", "ON THEIR OWN!!"

I Guarantee that the "Insurance Companies" have "Calculated In" the "Free Care" rendered by "The 'Docs'"!

I Further Promise You, that WHEN the 'Doc's elect to Charge for their "Free Care," the "Insurance Companies" will MASSIVELY increase their "Premiums!!"

Do you Wonder WHY the "EXECUTIVES" of an "Insurance Company" make TEN TIMES what a 'Doc Makes??

Doc

16 posted on 05/22/2005 6:09:25 PM PDT by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan from Florida; Goodgirlinred; Abby4116; Alissa; AlwaysFree; amdgmary; Amos the Prophet; ...
Wesley J. Smith/Physician Assisted-Suicide ping

Ohioan from Florida's ping list, v.5-19-05

17 posted on 05/22/2005 10:34:16 PM PDT by TheSarce (Liberalism: The irrational, intolerant cult that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSarce

Thanks for the ping!


18 posted on 05/22/2005 10:39:41 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: STD

I'll bet within the decade Kaiser will be a leader in euthanasia. Their treatment model has been trending this way for quite some time.


19 posted on 05/22/2005 11:37:01 PM PDT by tertiary01 (Help.....I'm a victim of Mexican imperialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD

Yikes, down to dollars and cents -- not life!


20 posted on 05/23/2005 3:48:48 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSarce

bump


21 posted on 05/23/2005 3:59:05 AM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

ping


22 posted on 05/23/2005 3:59:36 AM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSarce

Thanks for the ping to this important article.


23 posted on 05/23/2005 4:12:08 AM PDT by syriacus (Have YOU hugged a rudderless, cranky, down-at-the-mouth liberal -like Harry Reid- today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: STD

Bookmarked, thank you.


24 posted on 05/23/2005 4:14:58 AM PDT by syriacus (Have YOU hugged a rudderless, cranky, down-at-the-mouth liberal -like Harry Reid- today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD
The high price of treating the uninsured
25 posted on 05/23/2005 4:46:34 AM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD
It is the logic of socialism to kill off underproductive persons of any age or medical condition.

As soon as you start the killing, the immediate next step is cost calculations to show that it's cheaper to snuff the old, the sick, the disabled, preemies, babies with birth defects and so on.

26 posted on 05/23/2005 7:38:39 AM PDT by T'wit ("There was once a boy named Eustace Clarence Scrubb and he almost deserved it." - C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD

bttt

a sad thanks for posting what must be known


27 posted on 05/23/2005 8:07:36 AM PDT by kimmie7 (Right now it's "Don't get old in Florida." Soon it'll just be "Don't get old.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

In other words, we won't see any benefits from it.


28 posted on 05/23/2005 4:17:46 PM PDT by Nightshift (Faith is something everyone has. The question is faith in what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift
Exactly. The cynic in me thinks that this talk about "savings" is just another way of saying: "Why in the hell are we wasting money on people who are dying. Let them DIE, and give 'em a boost if necessary, then let ME spend all of that money we saved."
29 posted on 05/23/2005 4:46:33 PM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tertiary01
"I'll bet within the decade Kaiser will be a leader in euthanasia. Their treatment model has been trending this way for quite some time."

Probably followed close behind by Seattle's Group Health, lovingly known locally as "Group Death", one of the worst health care facilities around. Tons of imported doctors and nurses who barely speak english.

30 posted on 05/23/2005 6:16:25 PM PDT by holyscroller (A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him to the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller

You need to know Tagalog in order to be an informed patient in the Kaiser "Health System".


31 posted on 05/23/2005 7:09:25 PM PDT by tertiary01 (Help.....I'm a victim of Mexican imperialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson