Senate Roll Vote on Filibuster Fight

The Washington Post ^ | May 24, 2005 | AP

[carolinacrazy]

Democrats No

Biden, Del.; Boxer, Calif.; Cantwell, Wash.; Corzine, N.J.; Dayton, Minn.; Dodd, Conn.; Dorgan, N.D.; Feingold, Wis.; Kennedy, Mass.; Kerry, Mass.; Lautenberg, N.J.; Levin, Mich.; Lincoln, Ark.; Murray, Wash.; Reed, R.I.; Sarbanes, Md.; Stabenow, Mich.

[inquest]

Republicans are the party of religious fundamentalism. In the United States is called values, in the mid-east it's called terrorism...

Mr. Moderator, could we please let this troll stick around? It's so much fun to watch neurotic libs sputter around like this.

[inquest]

Oh well, too late...

[Pessimist]

Gee! Priscilla Owen is such a "radical right wing idealogue", yet 26 dems voted for her anyway.

[Michael.SF.]

yet 26 dems voted for her anyway.

Actually, they have not yet officially voted on her approval. I believe that many of these 26 will vote against her when the time comes.

[Stirner]

"I thought I heard Dodd say AYE on the vote?"

I think you are right. I definitely heard Sarbanes announced as voting Yes, but later in the roll call I heard him listed as voting No. Apparently Senators can announce a vote and then change it as long as votes are still being taken.

[OldFriend]

Doubtful that the info on this thread is correct.

[inquest]

Apparently Senators can announce a vote and then change it as long as votes are still being taken.

Yes, I've seen that happen before, too.

[aumrl]

not only hilly, but leahy while "jumpin jim" voted no.he really was some republican!