Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Elizabeth Dole Reacts To Judicial Compromise
National Republican Senatorial Committee ^ | 5/24/05

Posted on 05/24/2005 8:12:40 PM PDT by MplsSteve

Senator Elizabeth Dole (R-NC), Chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, issued the following statement on the judicial compromise:

"Although I am pleased that some of the President's qualified judicial nominees are finally getting the fair up or down vote they deserve, I am disappointed that not all nominees will be afforded that same courtesy. The understanding made by the group of fourteen made clear that judicial philosophy is not a legitimate reason to filibuster qualified judges.

If Democrats should choose to continue their unprecedented use of the filibuster, we should immediately move to the constitutional option. Although I believe a vote on the constitutional option was certainly justified today, I am glad that it has not been taken off the table for future confirmation debates."

(Excerpt) Read more at nrsc.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 109th; elizabethdole; filibuster; nrsc
I'm putting this up for comment only. I have mixed feelings regarding the compromise myself.

Opinions or comments on Seantor Dole's statement...anyone?

1 posted on 05/24/2005 8:12:40 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

It's nice to see a Republican Senator who backs the President, after a day of McCain and Graham and Voinovich.


2 posted on 05/24/2005 8:15:49 PM PDT by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
She could try doing her job and recruiting a few conservatives to run for senate, and, maybe, just maybe, work on clearing some fields, making things hard (at least) for democrats up for re-election in red states.

Then we wouldn't need the constitutional option.

Then again, I knew the GOP screwed up when they gave her the job over Senator Coleman.

3 posted on 05/24/2005 8:16:33 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

The NRSC gets no donations from me until Frist gets his caucus in order.


4 posted on 05/24/2005 8:17:02 PM PDT by RWR8189 (I Will Sit on My Hands in 2008 Instead of Voting for McCain)(No Money for the NRSC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

"The understanding made by the group of fourteen made clear that judicial philosophy is not a legitimate reason to filibuster qualified judges."

Since the horse is out of the barn, the above statement is true.......so Nuke the filibuster the very instant that one appears eminent! (like they should have already)


5 posted on 05/24/2005 8:17:32 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

click on the link and let them know what you think. I told them no more money from me until they cut off funds for the seven traitors and fund their opposition in the primary.


6 posted on 05/24/2005 8:27:50 PM PDT by centexan (Announcing your intentions is a good way to make God laugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

I wonder if she is enjoying the emails from their website. I notice how they don't have a phone number that is easily accesible.

I sent them an email today telling them to take my name off of their mailing list and kiss their donations goodbye.


7 posted on 05/24/2005 8:31:10 PM PDT by politicket (Hypothesis of Evolution - HOE - The Secular Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
If Democrats should choose to continue their unprecedented use of the filibuster, we should immediately move to the constitutional option.

Sounds to me like she found the cajones that McCain seems to have lost.

8 posted on 05/24/2005 8:33:07 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

I agree with her:

1. We have to wait to see if the Dims in the 14 keep their side of the deal. [We also have to see if Graham is right and all the other judges get an up or down vote too.]

2. If the Dims go back on their word, Frist should act immediately.


9 posted on 05/24/2005 8:33:43 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

She could be denying reelection funds to the the 3 of the 7 up for election in 2006 and offering funds to their primary candidates. Chaffee, at least, can clearly be defeated in a primary. We're more likely to 'lose' the seat then, but in reality we only have his for organizational purposes. We can afford to lose one to make a point to the other RINOs.


10 posted on 05/24/2005 8:37:57 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
Senator Elizabeth Dole (R-NC), Chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee

Ah, yes... the organization that will receive no more of my cash until they state in writing that they will not fund the campaigns of any of the seven RINOS that betrayed their country.

Sorry, Liz.

11 posted on 05/24/2005 8:49:43 PM PDT by upchuck (If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

It's always been my understanding that the NRSC will never work against an incumbent GOP senator...regardless of that Senator's ideology.

In '04, the NRSC backed Arlen Specter in his primary against Pat Toomey. In '02, I believe that even backed Bob Smith over John Sununu.


12 posted on 05/24/2005 8:57:53 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
My email to the NRSC:
I am EXTREMLY upset at what seven RINO senators did Monday evening, May 23, 2005.

These party traitors must learn that actions have consequences.

Accordingly, if you will state in writing that they will receive no funding from the NRSC in their upcoming campaigns and that the NRSC will be funding their primary opponents, I will consider resuming funding your organization.

Until then, expect no support or contributions from me.


13 posted on 05/24/2005 9:00:34 PM PDT by upchuck (If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
The NRSC gets no donations from me until Frist gets his caucus in order

I agree. Why waste time, energy and money on getting republicans elected when they are only going to cross over to the other side of the aisle on crucial issues.

14 posted on 05/24/2005 9:07:07 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

We could not give him that much funds and let him raise his own. But if the RNC tries to fund a primary challenger against Chaffee, he might just switch parties and get re-elected anyway. While making a example out of one RINO might be a good thing. I wonder if this is the one to do so with. Some RINO's are RINO's because they have to be to get elected. I think we should go after a RINO that doesn't need to be a RINO in their home state. While McCain would be my first choice I say go after Lindsey Graham. He has been a thorn in the side of Bush for some time now and he doesn't need to be to get re-elected in his own state. This guy needs to go and at least there is enough of a conservative base in that state to oust him. And if he tries to run for president, the Clinton lovers will remember his role in the impeachment episode. This would be the loser I would go after.


15 posted on 05/24/2005 9:09:08 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
It's always been my understanding that the NRSC will never work against an incumbent GOP senator...regardless of that Senator's ideology.

That is what I thought.

16 posted on 05/24/2005 9:10:43 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I bailed on the NRSC when they had the 100-0 vote to not hold a real impeachment trial on Clinton. All the GOP had to do was support the status quo rules, essentially those used in Andrew Johnson's trial and then polished by the Democrats (including Hillary) for anticipated use against Nixon and then further polished by the Democrats for anticipated use against Reagan. They weren't going to get the 2/3 to convict, but they had the 50 needed to protect the honor of the Senate and force a real trial. Every GOP Senator then in office bailed and the best of them, Phil Gramm, co-authored the bail out with Ted Kennedy! Every one of those 50 cowards needs replacing, some of them (e.g. the then least worthy House manager, Lindsey Graham) more than once. My Senate $ goes to the Club for Growth.
17 posted on 05/24/2005 9:18:25 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Yes, it's out of Liddy Dole's hands, really.

When I got her e-mail today, I was encouraged. I shared it with fellow Republicans in this area, since it is solid evidence that the leadership of the party is HEARING our rage. That doesn't necessarily mean they will do anything, but they are acknowledging our anger, and the righteousness of our cause.

So, keep those phone calls coming.


18 posted on 05/24/2005 9:18:34 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
Members of the RINO party just got done voting No on the Constitutional Option. Frist only needs 2 more conservatives to reform the judiciary. Contrary to rumors, Spector and Lott both held fast.

Members of the RINO party
Next Election Name State Class
2006 Snowe ME 3
2006 Chafee RI 3
2006 DeWine OH 1
2008 Graham SC 1
2008 Warner VA 2
2008 Collins ME 3
2010 McCain AZ 2

Class Key
  1. Red state RINO, WTF?
  2. Red state sacred cow RINO, WTF?
  3. Blue state RINO at least adds to Republican majority

WTF stands for Why The Freak? (polite form)
19 posted on 05/24/2005 9:32:02 PM PDT by Milhous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

I have it from a good source that Frist is going to fight back by openly declaring he never signed off on any agreement and will hence forth bring up every single Bush nominee currently not voted on.

This could, and should, force both sides of the 14 to put up or shut up.

We'll see.


20 posted on 05/24/2005 9:35:37 PM PDT by Fledermaus (The New 7 Dwarfs: Cowardly, Cranky, Dopey, Goofy, Mealy, Sorry and Wussy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead
I agree Lindsey needs to go and in his state we have a good chance to do better. Too bad we can't clone Jim DeMint! However, Graham isn't up in 2006, Chaffee is and he has the worst voting record of all the RINOs. He's nearly as bad as Jumping Jim Jeffords before the jump. And he'd be easy to defeat in a primary, easier than any of the others up in '06, if there was any sign of official GOP backing for the challenge. The state party is small enough, the Club for Growth and other grass roots organizations might be able to topple him by themselves. The others up in '06, Snowe and DeWine, would be much harder to defeat in primaries. A successful effort to ditch Chaffee may encourage the base enough to pick up seats elsewhere in '06. Chafee now, Graham later. And restart the petitions to recall McCain now!
21 posted on 05/24/2005 9:36:20 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Milhous
Class Key

1. Red state RINO, WTF?

2. Red state sacred cow RINO, WTF?

3. Blue state RINO at least adds to Republican majority

LOL

22 posted on 05/24/2005 9:38:53 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

My only fear of going after Chaffee is that he will jump and run as a democrat and become a senator for life. I am very leery of going after RINO's in soft republican states for that reason. Now if someone could find some real dirt on him or one of these other RINO's I would feel much better.


23 posted on 05/24/2005 9:46:51 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Milhous

I think you still have the "class" column bollixed. The class 1's are all up for election simulyaneously. Ditto 2 and 3.


24 posted on 05/24/2005 9:57:12 PM PDT by cookcounty ("We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts" ---Abe Lincoln, 1858.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
I think you still have the "class" column bollixed. The class 1's are all up for election simulyaneously. Ditto 2 and 3.

Using my definition of RINO class. You're probably thinking of the official definition of Senate class.

25 posted on 05/24/2005 10:00:53 PM PDT by Milhous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Don't think like a scared moderate. We're better than that! So he becomes an official Rat. All he's now good for is voting to organize the GOP majority. We have 55 votes for that with him, 54 without. We can afford to lose one. On everything else that matters he already votes as a Democrat. We have NOTHING to lose. We'll likely gain more seats overall in '06, IF we can keep the base happy. Actively chasing Chaffee will make the base happy! Seeing Chaffee chased because of his traitorous votes might even encourage some of the weak minded RINOs (e.g. Collins, Hagel) to stay on the winning reservation.


26 posted on 05/24/2005 10:07:03 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer
Seeing Chaffee chased because of his traitorous votes might even encourage some of the weak minded RINOs (e.g. Collins, Hagel) to stay on the winning reservation.

Might make Olds Media accolade junkies quit cold turkey.

27 posted on 05/24/2005 10:11:56 PM PDT by Milhous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day; TaxRelief; 100%FEDUP; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; ~Vor~; A2J; a4drvr; Adder; ...

NC *Ping*

Please FRmail Constitution Day OR TaxRelief OR Alia if you want to be added to or removed from this North Carolina ping list.
28 posted on 05/25/2005 4:39:38 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
I am glad to see Senator Dole make a clear statement that she still supports the Constitutional Option. This "Compromise" just reached will probably blow up when a nominee for the Supreme Court is in the Senate, if not before then.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "The Gunfight at Not-OK Corral"

29 posted on 05/25/2005 5:54:23 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (For copies of my speech, "Dealing with Outlaw Judges," please Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy
Republican Senator who backs the President

And that's all seat belt Liddy does. Good God, they made this woman chair of something? There really are no conservatives left in the Senate are there?

30 posted on 05/25/2005 6:04:30 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Not a bad comment.

I don't trust her any further than I could throw the globalist government she too often works in behalf of.


31 posted on 05/25/2005 7:17:03 AM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Unlike Senator Dole, I am not the least bit pleased by this sell out as usual by the sucka$$es who convince us they're conservative Republicans, until we send them to Washington and it comes time for them to stand up and do what they promised to do and then don't.

It was time to use the Constitutional option- our side had the power to apply it successfully, and then our losers fled from a chance at overwlelming victory, like those liberal hippie democrats flee from soap, water and truth.


32 posted on 05/25/2005 11:50:55 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Immediate unpaid retirement -fitting reward, for all GOP Senator's committed to DEM agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

My 2 Sentors, Specter and Santorum and Rep. Sherwood know that:

'THERE IS NOT ONE CENT FROM ME, NOR IS THERE ONE VOTE FROM ME FOR THEM UNTIL THE REPUBLICAN SENATORS CAN DO WHAT WE ELECTED THEM TO DO, AND SUPPORT OUR PRESIDENT ON HIS JUDGES'

I sent this out last week, I have had two letters from Santorum, one from Sherwood and nothing from Specter.

This morning I recieved a call from the RNC for donations, and I told him NOPE, and he started arguing with me, so I yelled at him over the phone WHAT PART OF NO DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND? and hung up.

Good luck to the rest of the Republicans, make them do their jobs or don't relect them and don't give money to any of them!


33 posted on 05/25/2005 2:29:10 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (Prayers ease the heavy burdens of the living....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson