Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rosen not guilty
Cnn TV ^ | 5/27/2005 | CNN

Posted on 05/27/2005 10:30:29 AM PDT by minus_273

CNN reporting right now David Rosen not guilty

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: clinton; conspiracy; coverup; davidrosen; football; hillary; hillaryscandals; lucypulls; moronjudge; rosen; whitewash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-206 next last

1 posted on 05/27/2005 10:30:29 AM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

All I can say is wow.


2 posted on 05/27/2005 10:30:57 AM PDT by Petronski (A champion of dance, my moves will put you in a trance, and I never leave the disco alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Shocking. (not)


3 posted on 05/27/2005 10:30:58 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

what a shock


4 posted on 05/27/2005 10:31:22 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (I'm rootin' for ya Bolton, but please lose the 'stache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Of course...even the prosecutor acted as if this was no big deal.


5 posted on 05/27/2005 10:31:53 AM PDT by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Oh, this is gonna be interesting....


6 posted on 05/27/2005 10:32:26 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

7 posted on 05/27/2005 10:32:26 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Shades of Al Capone....


8 posted on 05/27/2005 10:32:44 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight

i suspect they linked this to Hillarys 2008 chances and didnt want to hurt her


9 posted on 05/27/2005 10:32:59 AM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

If you are guilty make sure you are tried in this DC. If you are a Republican and innocent, get as far away as possible.


10 posted on 05/27/2005 10:34:41 AM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
"i suspect they linked this to Hillarys 2008 chances and didnt want to hurt her"

Yep, Hitlery and her ilk own the judiciary.
11 posted on 05/27/2005 10:34:52 AM PDT by jdm (Estoy En Una Radio Mexicana (I'm On A Mexican Radio))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

OK, I need a lawyer to explain what this means.


12 posted on 05/27/2005 10:35:11 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

if anyone EVER ponders what difference judges make , well ,"HERE COME DE JUDGE"


13 posted on 05/27/2005 10:35:49 AM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

This was a tough case to sell to a jury. This was not an Enron-type fraud that hurt people. It would be hard for a jury to even understand the difference between hard and soft money, much less care if someone lied to the FEC about it.


14 posted on 05/27/2005 10:36:28 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Sometimes I wonder if this is still the United States


15 posted on 05/27/2005 10:36:58 AM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I'm no lawyer, but it sounds as though all a perp has to do, well certain perps anyway, is claim ignorance of the law and all will be forgiven.

But this still makes me of how they eventually got Capone.

16 posted on 05/27/2005 10:36:58 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
Drudge has the sunburn up, but no disco lights.
17 posted on 05/27/2005 10:37:41 AM PDT by jdm (Estoy En Una Radio Mexicana (I'm On A Mexican Radio))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
They couldn't even prosecute Ted Kennedy for Vehicular Manslaughter. Do you honestly think they'd throw Hillary's money man in jail?
18 posted on 05/27/2005 10:38:02 AM PDT by Bogey78O (*tagline removed per request*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: DickCoulterBush

Zot this bastard!


20 posted on 05/27/2005 10:39:14 AM PDT by jdm (Estoy En Una Radio Mexicana (I'm On A Mexican Radio))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

So, someone didn't want to end up 6 feet under, I suppose.


21 posted on 05/27/2005 10:39:39 AM PDT by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Cleanup in aisle 19.


22 posted on 05/27/2005 10:39:42 AM PDT by jdm (Estoy En Una Radio Mexicana (I'm On A Mexican Radio))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DickCoulterBush

See ya @sswipe


23 posted on 05/27/2005 10:41:18 AM PDT by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
OK, I need a lawyer to explain what this means

One lawyer who blogs on white-collar criminal cases has been saying for a while that the prosecution had a weak case.

24 posted on 05/27/2005 10:41:53 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Didn't the judge say this before the trial? There must be an alternative to our illegal justice system.


25 posted on 05/27/2005 10:42:05 AM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

It means that if you are rich and or got powerful friends you too can be a Senator from NY.


26 posted on 05/27/2005 10:45:26 AM PDT by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

The Bush family strikes again...federal prosecutors refused to use a damning tape--to the shock of everyone including the judge. Without that they had little chance of convicting Rosen.


27 posted on 05/27/2005 10:45:48 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

The trolls are gonna keep you busy today. What is it about holidays that bring them out?


28 posted on 05/27/2005 10:46:02 AM PDT by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Viking Kitties... waiting for the Viking Kitties...


29 posted on 05/27/2005 10:47:16 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (I'm rootin' for ya Bolton, but please lose the 'stache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Doug says there will still be a civil trial.


30 posted on 05/27/2005 10:47:54 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (I'm rootin' for ya Bolton, but please lose the 'stache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
Seems the RATS are winning battles left and right!!! If this continues, criminals not held accountable for their crimes, our country is going to go down the tubes FAST! God help us! Have we lost our way?
31 posted on 05/27/2005 10:48:18 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

I hate this.

Every time I tell myself to quit being so negative and believe for just once, it turns out like this.
Much better to just be consistently cynical and right.

Not that a Clinton appointed judge could have had anything to do with the result.


32 posted on 05/27/2005 10:48:59 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (I leave reason and good manners to those that have them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

The whole thing was part of the Hillary Reclamation Project.
Another scandal squashed, so when she's asked about it later, as with all the scandals, she'll say "this is old news, the matter was adjudicated already."
It's exactly why she wrote the book, to innoculate herself. So, when she's aksed tough questions, she'll respond, "I dealt with that in my book."


33 posted on 05/27/2005 10:49:06 AM PDT by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

That's why they want to maintain control of the judiciary.


34 posted on 05/27/2005 10:49:20 AM PDT by b4its2late (It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Let's go to the audiotape....


35 posted on 05/27/2005 10:50:36 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Yea, but how far away is Arkanside?


36 posted on 05/27/2005 10:50:45 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

why didn't this clinton appointed judge, recuse him/herself?


37 posted on 05/27/2005 10:51:15 AM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

I said long ago that this would go no whee and Hillary will skate, she will get away with anything and everything.She is protected by the media. She is and always has been the American Evita.


38 posted on 05/27/2005 10:51:50 AM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

This is exactly why the rats want to keep the GOP from appointing conservative judges. As far as another Clintonista getting away with a crime is par for the course. Damien's Untouchables..


39 posted on 05/27/2005 10:52:11 AM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jw777

Because this is exactly why he was put on the bench in the first place.


40 posted on 05/27/2005 10:52:31 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (I leave reason and good manners to those that have them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

Is the civil trial where Peter Paul will introduce his evidence to convict the hildebeast?


41 posted on 05/27/2005 10:52:57 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Yep. According to PP, both X42 and Mrs. Clinton will have to testify.


42 posted on 05/27/2005 10:54:31 AM PDT by b4its2late (It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

I think that's what Doug talks about, he'd be the one to explain it.


43 posted on 05/27/2005 10:54:43 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (I'm rootin' for ya Bolton, but please lose the 'stache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: mewzilla
Oh, this is gonna be interesting....

How so?

45 posted on 05/27/2005 10:55:47 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: uws1

Bye, bye troll


46 posted on 05/27/2005 10:56:00 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jw777
why didn't this clinton appointed judge, recuse him/herself?

Neither side asked him to.

47 posted on 05/27/2005 10:56:32 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: minus_273

What a farce.


49 posted on 05/27/2005 10:57:40 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Incredible!


50 posted on 05/27/2005 10:57:45 AM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson