Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Post Office Sidesteps Fray on Illicit Sales of Cigarettes
NY Times ^ | May 29, 2005 | MICHAEL COOPER

Posted on 05/28/2005 10:17:17 PM PDT by neverdem

ALBANY, May 26 - As they move to thwart the illegal trade of cigarettes over the Internet, state officials have joined colleagues from around the nation in persuading the major credit card companies to stop processing payments for online cigarette sales. Additionally, the state has enacted a law prohibiting the shipment of cigarettes to its residents and banned private carriers, like FedEx, from shipping cigarettes.

But as state officials fight illegal online cigarette sales, one operation is not falling into line - the United States Postal Service, which officials say delivers the bulk of illegally purchased cigarettes to New Yorkers.

The Postal Service, citing concerns about the privacy of the mail and wary of putting postal clerks in the position of deciding which packages to accept and which to reject, is resisting the growing calls that it stop shipping cigarettes.

Its stance is exasperating law enforcement officials. "It is outrageous that the federal government - through the United States Postal Service - is knowingly acting as the delivery arm for these criminal enterprises," New York's attorney general, Eliot Spitzer, said in a statement.

The role of the post office in shipping illegally sold cigarettes is also attracting attention across the nation. Last month the National Association of Attorneys General asked the Postal Service to "adopt a firm policy prohibiting transportation of packages that the carrier knows or reasonably should know contains cigarettes sold illegally on the Internet." In Oregon, an online cigarette seller was charged in January with unlawful distribution of cigarettes and racketeering; the post office was not charged but was named in the indictment as part of the racketeering enterprise.

--snip--

Postal officials say that they are committed to fighting illegal activities conducted through the mail, but complain that their hands are tied.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New York; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: cancer; contraband; dirtyrats; filthyhabit; govwatch; postalservice; pufflist; radicalleftists; rats; smoking; smuggling; taxaddicts; taxaholics; taxcheats; taxjunkies; taxraisingrats; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Congress has considered legislation that would ban the mailing of cigarettes.

--snip--

They note that Priority Mail, which officials say is most frequently used to ship cigarettes, cannot be inspected without a search warrant or the consent of either the sender or the recipient.

1 posted on 05/28/2005 10:17:18 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

To get into this investigation of cigarette mailings...means not only a search warrant, but additional manpower. The Post Office folks are in a serious competition with FEDEX and UPS...and really can't afford to add more onto costs. I can understand the issue at hand...but the state has pushed enough taxes onto a product...in the same fashion as England did in 1760-1770 with tea import to the US. We are now at the point where people are willing to do illegal (at least with a stupid law) movement of items. That should be a hint of more things to come.


2 posted on 05/28/2005 10:23:37 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
Yup, we know who the real criminals are.
3 posted on 05/28/2005 10:37:12 PM PDT by SkymanOH (I am OHIOfor BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

No problemo, just label the evil weed as "Wine." The supremes just gave the OK for internet vino sales.

No second hand smokey, but wino drunken drivers oka-dokay?


4 posted on 05/28/2005 10:40:55 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem



I just want to say as a citizen of New York- that I am just honored my state government cares this much about my health! I mean it's not like this is about money or anything! lalalal


5 posted on 05/28/2005 10:42:32 PM PDT by LauraleeBraswell (I will never again read another thing by Christopher Hitchens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The role of the post office in shipping illegally sold cigarettes is also attracting attention across the nation.

There is nothing illegal about those cigarettes. If the buyer doesn't pay local taxes on something bought in interstate commerce, that's a local problem, not a federal one. The states, in their hunger for money, raised the taxes so high that out-of-state purchases can save a lot of money on a legal substance. Now they want the federal government, and private industry, to collect those ridiculously high taxes for them, for free.

The least the states could do is offer a cut of the tax money to the companies that snitch for them.

I don't smoke, but my freedom from stupid taxation is at stake here, too. Governments can no more repeal the laws of the marketplace than they can the laws of physics.

6 posted on 05/28/2005 10:58:44 PM PDT by 300winmag (FR's Hobbit Hole supports America's troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

In NYC, state, city and federal taxex amounts to $35/carton, or $3.50 per pack.


7 posted on 05/28/2005 11:09:50 PM PDT by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis
The supremes just gave the OK for internet vino sales.

You say that like it's a bad thing. The problem was that some stupid law was passed against it for some reason long ago.

There are at least a five hundred different wineries and vineyards in the US and previously the only way to get some of their wine was to either drive there yourself and pay for it, or find it at a wine and liquor store that orders it for you and then pay different mark-up for the different hands it has to pass thru.

I think this is simply the Gov't getting the hell out of the way of the local business.

8 posted on 05/28/2005 11:35:38 PM PDT by perfect stranger (I need new glasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell; cyborg; Clemenza; Cacique; NYCVirago; The Mayor; Darksheare; hellinahandcart; ...
I just want to say as a citizen of New York- that I am just honored my state government cares this much about my health! I mean it's not like this is about money or anything! lalalal

How dare you even insinuate that Eliot Spitzer and these other high minded politicians have any intention other than to protect their citizens' health and lives so that they can collect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid for as long as possible. /sarcasm

FReepmail me if you want on or off my New York ping list.

9 posted on 05/29/2005 12:45:56 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
How dare you even insinuate that Eliot Spitzer and these other high minded politicians have any intention other than to protect their citizens' health and lives so that they can collect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid for as long as possible.

I actually met Spitzer.

The national GOP should be scared.

The guy may be full of BS, but no matter what, he talks a damn good game.

He gave me a lecture about how NYS taxes are to high and how they have to be lowered to attract capital.

Realize that he doesn't believe in supply side economics and then realize he knows people do, and then undersand, he knows how to lie and get ahead.

This guy is alot more dangerious then Hillary Clinton, he knows conservatism, and how to talk it, and how to lie about it, and then, how to win, he is more popular (according to his own internal polls) with republicans then he is with democrats.

If he really wanted to, he would beat Pataki, in a primary.

10 posted on 05/29/2005 1:36:00 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
This guy is alot more dangerious then Hillary Clinton, he knows conservatism, and how to talk it, and how to lie about it, and then, how to win, he is more popular (according to his own internal polls) with republicans then he is with democrats.

NY looks hopeless.

11 posted on 05/29/2005 2:34:56 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
NY looks hopeless.

When things look good, they vote liberal, when things go bad, they vote GOP.

Its not that hopeless, its just idiotic.

The fact that Spitzer is more popular with republicans then democrats does scare me though.

He is also an often invited guest of the "Federalist" society.

12 posted on 05/29/2005 2:41:18 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
C'mon, Government, if cigarettes are so damn bad make them illegal. I dare you!

You don't give a damn about my health. It's the money. And you're proving it with these tactics.

13 posted on 05/29/2005 2:51:29 AM PDT by Flyer (Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
C'mon, Government, if cigarettes are so damn bad, make them illegal. I dare you!

Ha ha! They can't do it. Smokers vote and the ones that don't vote would register instantly.

14 posted on 05/29/2005 3:41:11 AM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

I doubt any cares about the smoker's voting block. The taxes they pay on tobacco however...


15 posted on 05/29/2005 6:34:12 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: I_dmc

Think of it this way: "Oh, you voted for the cigarette tax? I'm voting for your opponent and so are all of my friends." See?


16 posted on 05/29/2005 6:48:11 AM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
The Post Office folks are in a serious competition with FEDEX and UPS...and really can't afford to add more onto costs.

Unfortunately, they're able to add whatever they need because - unlike private industry - the USPS has an endless trough from which to feed.

17 posted on 05/29/2005 6:51:17 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (I don't drink and FReep...it just looks that way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
The supremes just gave the OK for internet vino sales.
You say that like it's a bad thing. The problem was that some stupid law was passed against it for some reason long ago.

"There are at least a five hundred different wineries and vineyards in the US and previously the only way to get some of their wine was to either drive there yourself and pay for it, or find it at a wine and liquor store that orders it for you and then pay different mark-up for the different hands it has to pass thru.

I think this is simply the Gov't getting the hell out of the way of the local business."

Irony is lost on some people. Guess it depends on whose ox is being gored, cigarettes bad, mind altering alcohol good?


The supreme court ruled it is alright for wine drinkers to buy on the Internet and avoid state taxes. But, they deny that same right to smokers. Both are legal products, why the difference?
18 posted on 05/29/2005 8:42:07 AM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If New York just cut their ciggie tax down to size they could fix the problem immediately.


19 posted on 05/29/2005 10:00:08 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Defeat Pat DeWine, RINO Mike DeWine's son! Tom Brinkman for Congress http://www.gobrinkman.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I quit smoking, cold turkey, a little more than two years ago. Food DOES NOT taste better. Anyhoo - a state cannot prevent interstate commerce.


20 posted on 05/29/2005 10:15:25 AM PDT by olde north church (Start icing the judicial cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson