Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ex-Texan
Goldman Sachs predicted $ 105 a barrel two months ago.

That was an obvious and clumsy attempt to manipulate the market.

37 posted on 05/29/2005 11:11:00 AM PDT by Petronski (A champion of dance, my moves will put you in a trance, and I never leave the disco alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski
Reagarding Goldman Sachs forecast of $ 105 oil:

That price forecast may come to be considered very cheap. Think in terms of the "worst case scenario" of what possibly could happen to effect the price of oil adversely.

1. King Fahd dies and the 'next little prince in line' is assassinated;

2. Venezuela decides to nationalize foreign oil companies and begins cutting oil production generally;

3. Wahabbi militants take control of Saidi Arabia and at the same time force Musharraf out taking take power in Pakistan;

4. Pakistan's three stealth submarines equipped with nuke cruise missles are now in the hands of Islamic militants running their military.

Which brings me back to my central theme: Depending on oil for our fuel supply is foolishness beyond belief.

The U.S. must develop cheap alternative enegry sources. Out national security depends on new technology, like the program suggested by Hodar. Converting Shi'ite to fuel is a great idea. We need this new fuel source "like yesterday." Otherwise, we are being led over the cliff like a bunch of confused lemmings.

45 posted on 05/29/2005 3:52:16 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson