7 'extraordinary' idiots(Ann Coulter)

WND.com ^ | June 1, 2005 | Ann Coulter

[TomasUSMC]

FILIBUSTER THE AGREEMENT.

Thats right. Have the remaining loyal 48 republicans start a filibuster,that freezes the entire senate and that does not end till the 7 republican repudiate the agreement.

Fire with Fire.

[Chu Gary]

Sorry, I guess I have missed your editorials and your best selling books.

[BOBWADE]

McCain and his 6 buddy rhinocrats are fools. They didn't even realize that they got nothing in exchange for giving up everything. They agreed to legitimize the Dems right to filibuster in exchange for allowing the dems to rectify their biggest PR blunders of the decade. They were the ones taking heat for blocking Janice Rogers-Brown and others and were at the point of caving. This was the catalyst giving the momentum to the Republicans for invoking the constitutional option. What do we do? IMPLODE! (Man am I getting mad again) We let them rectify their biggest mistakes in exchange for selling out our own party. WHAT LOSERS!!!!!!!!!!! I would only hope that these 7 lose all chairmanships and RNC funding.

[texasflower]

I don't have to write editorials or best selling books.

I am a READER. As a READER of Ann's childish stuff, I am dissatisfied. Got a problem with that?

[VegasBaby]

***I'll take Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi over the likes of John McCain and John Warner any day. At least with the Democrats, I know where I stand.***

Well you certainly wouldn't know it considering the sham smoke and mirrors campaign Reid pulled last November. His slogan was..."Independent, like Nevada." He certainly did NOT want you to know were he stood. Unfortunately, the dimwitted voters bought it.

[BOBWADE]

Then to top things off, Frist shows that he has less testicles than mouse by not taking advantage of the moment. After the sellout, he should have lined up the cotes starting with the Borked nominees and made the Dems filibuster 7 nominees before they even got a chance to vote on the three that they did. After the first 5 or six filibusters, call a news conference to turn up the heat and then go nuclear. At least the 7 rhino's would have to go on the record opposing the option after multiple filibusters. They would have given it real thought before siding with the dems knowing what kind of commercials they were going to see in the next primary election.

[Chu Gary]

"I am a READER. As a READER of Ann's childish stuff, I am dissatisfied. Got a problem with that?"

My only problem is with people who claim odd things. Got a problem with that?

[knews_hound]

In 500 succinct and edited words, Ann Coulter nails it.

It seems the Repubs have won the last 6 elections and they act like it is 1977, Nixon has been thrown out and the GOP is at an all time low.

In an amazing coincidence, many of the 7 first held elected office soon after that.

Cheers,

knews hound

http://knewshound.blogspot.com/

[texasflower]

You think it's odd that I see Ann's stuff as childish?

First of all what part of "opinion" don't you understand?

Secondly, I'm not the only person who feels this way, but I am one of the few who will honestly say this stuff about Ann.

Reason? Because members of the Coulter cult can't handle the truth and they flame, flame, flame.

On another thread that reached almost 300 posts, I posted a mild opinion in the first 20 posts. At 289 posts, I am still being flamed for it.

As I see it, she is a mouthy, verbal bully who doesn't dress her age. She wears skirts that are inappropriate. They do nothing for her, only for the mid sections of men like you.

She is crude and unpleasant. She has become a liberal's dream because she can't control her mouth. She is as bad as Dean in some ways. They can use her rantings against us, just like we use Dean.

She crudely talked about blow jobs on a TV program the other night.

I was embarrassed to have her representing conservatives. She could be an asset. But she's not.

That's my OPINION and I don't give a damn what you think about it.

[BIGLOOK]

People claim odd things at odd times, oddly.

Good to see ya, Chu Gary!

[Mr. K]

Once again, I see your point but I disagree. That's her style, take it or leave it. Dave Barry writes funny, George Will writes boring (but brilliant) Ann writes this way...

I usually laugh my a$$ off at her laser-like needling of democraps, who deserve every bit of it.

[Chu Gary]

"You think it's odd that I see Ann's stuff as childish?"

Oh, I understand opinion and its definition just fine, I just don't understand why mouthy juveniles would be using this website - that term describes you perfectly!

[texasflower]

I may well be mouthy but I am far from a juvenile. I thought you little guys liked mouhty women? You all say it is her mind and her wit that you liked.

A women who has a mind and knows how to use it right?

You like that, right?

[Red Sea Swimmer]

"The Seven Extraordinary Idiots" just doesn't sound as good as "The Seven Samurai" does it ?

[El Oviedo]

How about Ann against Hillary - 2006?

[SevenMinusOne]

That's my OPINION and I don't give a damn what you think about it.

Don't sweat her Chu Gary - Her above remarks just about put texasflower in a nutshell - She is often wrong but never in doubt about her raving opinions - Which many on her already know -

And please Tex - "Ann's skirts are too short" - Texasflower, nobody cares what you think of her skirts - Why don't you just dress how you feel it is appropriate and stop worry about others...huh?...how about that.

And for the record Ann can intellectually think circles around you in her sleep.

[texasflower]

Well, well, well, here's the horrible devsix trying to bug me.

Didn't work honey.

[texasflower]

Oh, and that thing about Ann running circles around me in her sleep?

What makes you so sure? You know nothing at all about me.

First of all, my IQ test at 154, I don't know about her.

Not that it matters, because Ms. Coulter isn't actually using her brain. She using wit and sarcasm. Most of the things she says aren't "brilliant" they are merely sarcastic.

She has her catch phrases and each time she says them you guys think you are hearing from God himself.

But the second a "faceless" woman on the internet is sarcastic, you guys label us things like bitch, liberal, bleeding liberal and the other day, I got callled a commie because of a similar post on another thread.

You boys don't like sarcastic women unless she's in a short skirt. I don't know, do you imagine she's standing over you with a whip yelling, "say PLEASE and say you LIKE it INFIDEL!! ? Is that it?

Let me ask you something. If Ann looked like Nancy Pelosi and was saying all these wonderful sarcastic, bitting things but she was a conservative, would you still love her?

Oh, and don't actually bother to tell me the answer to that question above. It's easy to say "of course, it wouldn't make any difference, it's all about the cause", in answer to me.

Answer it to yourself. Give some thought to it. A big clue is the number of pictures of Coulter posted here. The RULES, don't forget the RULES. right?

Ann is not the best conservative writer we've got. She's just the one with the long blonde hair and short, short skirts.

As a woman, Ann is only furthering the opinion that looks count more than brains. She's not the best. She bores me to be honest.

Far better female columnists don't get the exposure here that Ann does. Don't mention Michelle Malkin as a default.

They are not the only two female columnist.

Understand something. I'm not a feminist. I personally adore men, and I'm not on some feminist kick here.

I just think that other columnists, male or female don't cause the same excitement around here that she does.

That's why I think you guys are deceiving yourself about her.

[SevenMinusOne]

Well now that was at least an entertaining (and even generally funny at times) post - I can appreciate it (even if I don't agree with all of it).

[Grateful One]

It is that brilliant use of sarcasm and wit that has brought Ann to where she is today. She brings to the forefront and highlights liberal hypocrisy in a way that few others can. Hence, her soaring popularity.

Liberals fear her style because it illustrates the constant contradictions in their "arguments". She comes after them in a way that reveals their lack of conviction, and, to me, her disdain of them in their presence reflects many of my own "feelings" towards these shallow pretenders.

Her "consistency" is what many of her readers look forward to!