Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEEP THROAT EXPOSED: A LEAKER IS NO HERO (self-serving Felt's loyalty was to himself)
NY POST ^ | June 2, 2005 | LETERS TO THE EDITOR

Posted on 06/02/2005 5:56:39 AM PDT by Liz

Maybe Mark Felt is a hero to the left, the way Benedict Arnold was a hero to the English ("Deep Throat Coughs It Up," June 1). But a selfish spiteful snitch is no American hero. They should pull his pension and benefits. He did not serve honorably in his office. He leaked confidential information for purely selfish reasons. He didn't just hurt President Nixon, he hurt the nation as a whole. Patrick Grant Brooklyn

****

Poor Felt. He was second in command of the FBI, and he didn't get the promotion to the post he thought he deserved. So he then pulls off a one-man coup. Now, Felt wants to go to his grave some sort of hero? I don't think so. He is a disgrace to any oath given in this land. Robert Garon Philmont

****

We now know the motive behind the Deep Throat outing: money. Felt's daughter is a selfish baby-boomer who is looking for her 15 minutes of fame and a quick buck. Her father clearly broke the law, and he abused his office and power to get back at the Nixon administration for passing him over as FBI director. It's nice to know that, within the Felt household, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Jim Ahlfeld Larchmont

****

It's no small irony that the man who exposed White House eavesdropping and dirty tricks is a Hoover-era FBI man, with a conviction for illegal wiretapping. Tom Matiska Swoyersville, Penn.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: deepthroat; feltgate; lte; markfelt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last
......(Felt's) a selfish spiteful snitch is no American hero. They should pull his pension and benefits. He did not serve honorably...... He leaked confidential information for purely selfish reasons. He didn't just hurt President Nixon, he hurt the nation as a whole.

Besides his slavish fanaticism to his own self-serving ambitions, what was Felt's hidden agenda?

It is no small consideration that the post-Nixon nation saw the horrific rise of liberalism---and the juggernaut to tolerate every idiocy the left wing could concoct.

Felt's disturbing motivation was solely to satisfy his vainglorious ambitions, not the good of the country.

No wonder Felt was passed over for promotion. The FBI had his number, alright.

Any other agent would be prosecuted for violating his oath of loyalty to the USA as an FBI agent.

What a TV news spectacle this guy's family put on---crowing about his "heroics."

He remained hidden for so long---now the family is *itching that Woodward and Bernstein made big bucks off "Deep Throat" ---and they are showing up to pocket the proceeds from this disgraceful conduct.

If Hollywood deigns to make a movie of this horror show, we should all flatout refuse to attend.

1 posted on 06/02/2005 5:56:39 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz

I suppose the Left is now going to apologize to Linda Tripp for all the bad things they said about her.

After all, She spied on her president as he engaged in illegal activities and exposed those lies to the nation.

Is she a hero too?


2 posted on 06/02/2005 5:58:50 AM PDT by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
How about the fact that what Nixon and his staff did was illegal?
3 posted on 06/02/2005 5:59:15 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

BTTT


4 posted on 06/02/2005 6:01:26 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

TThe left don't seem to mind Illegals they come into this country every day


5 posted on 06/02/2005 6:06:21 AM PDT by Judge Roy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Liz


Interesting that a man that worked in the Anti-commie Hoover FBI found no problem in destroying an administration during the cold war. Over a third rate buglary at the Dum Headquarters to find a hooker book. Nixon didn't break in yet he found no problem trying to destroy the gov of the US. Was he actually a commie mole? Things that make you go HUMMMMMM


6 posted on 06/02/2005 6:10:39 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

I would get more exercised about Nixon's purported "crimes" if the press and their sycophants weren't such hypocrites, making a huge deal of the "threats" posed by his conduct and ignoring much worse on the part of his predecessors and one successor. Thus, Donald Segretti serves time in prison and is hounded for writing a phony letter about Muskie in the 1972 election; Dick Tuck pulled all sorts of dirty tricks on the Nixon campaign on JFK's behalf and he's a "harmless, funny prankster (HA, HA!)". The Kennedy brothers at least tolerated the murders of the Diems, a far worse crime than a simple breakin, and not one jot of criticism. Teddy K. engages in obvious criminality with the death of a young woman and he's seen as the "Senate's elder statesman" with weight given to his critical words on Judges, of all things! Linda Tripp is a "snitch, tell on a friend" (her life may have been in danger if she hadn't made those recordings) while Mark Felt is a "hero" for a spite response to being passed over as FBI director, except for his actions that involved spying on violent bolshevik communists. I remember President Reagan sending the four ex-presidents, including Nixon, to Sadat's funeral and that nitwit Jimmy Carter (soundly rejected by the voters the prior year) edging away from him so as not to be photographed with him -- Nixon knew more in his thumb about the Middle East than the peanut knew about anything other than being a sanctimonious phony. You're the one whom Nixon should have edged away from, Mr. Carter!


7 posted on 06/02/2005 6:13:37 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
What Nixon did was quasi-legal. Any activities undertaken to keep the subversive demonrat party, the American wing of the international socialist movement out of office such as snooping through their offices is in defense of the Constitution of the United States of America.
8 posted on 06/02/2005 6:17:32 AM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly (!.....ripped from the headlines.....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
I believe the claim of illegality against President Nixon was that he covered up a crime.I believe Mr. Clinton's conduct constituted obstruction of justice, tampering with a witness, and criminal solicitation - all ONGOING crimes. The perjury was a little cherry on top. Mr. Felt was a law enforcement officer who chose to ignore the mandates of hisprfession to skulk in darkened garages and pass investigative documents to reporters, instead of presenting them to a U.S attorney and present them to a Grand Jury.Ms. Tripp, who was not a law enforcement officer, provided evidence of an ongoing criminal conspiracy to the same press that lionizes Mr. Felt. She was vilified. Why? They hated Nixon, but loved Bubba [Remember the female reporter who said she'd have hummed Clinton for all that easy access to abortion?]. And remember that Mr. Felt got a Presidential pardon for doing the same thing that Liddy wound up doing heavy time for.Seems he forgot to mention the Deep Throat thing at the time. So, no. He's no hero. He was a squalid little FBI apparatchik, and a moral coward of the first order. And the money his offspring covets? Thirty pieces of silver should about do it. And because I'm such a softy, you can adjust it for inflation.
9 posted on 06/02/2005 6:17:35 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

You're missing a huge point----the point that there were SOP in place to report illegal activity.


Felt vindictively decided to tear down a government and a president for his own self-serving reasons---b/c he had been passed over for a better position.

Felt used secret information that he received as a sworn FBI agent for his own self-serving agenda, when he should have passed the info on to higher-ups.


10 posted on 06/02/2005 6:17:56 AM PDT by Liz (A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

The Attorney General of the United States at the time of the Watergate break-in was none other than John Mitchell, who personally approved the break-in and paid for it out of a secret slush fund (and later did time.)

Who was Felt supposed to turn to, when the Justice Department was involved in the crime and the cover-up?

The Constitution provides for impeachment when the President commits high crimes and misdemeanors, which suggests to me that the proper place to go was to Congress -- and how better to get their attention than through the newspapers?


11 posted on 06/02/2005 6:21:27 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Oh, really? There are standard operating procedures for reporting that the President, his Attorney General, and White House staff authorized a burglary, paid for it out of a secret slush fund, and then covered it up?

Please tell me, I am all ears.

Should he have reported it to the Attorney General who personally authorized the break-in?


12 posted on 06/02/2005 6:23:33 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Liz

"DEEP THROAT EXPOSED: A LEAKER IS NO HERO"

Regardless of Felt's actions there is something wrong with calling a 90+ year-old man a "leaker".


13 posted on 06/02/2005 6:23:42 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Seven disloyal senators sold the chance to crush the democrats for tv face time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Don't foget the Cold war and Khruschevs statement that USSR would destroy us from WITHIN. Maybe he knew more than we thought. Felt destroyed the Nixon Administration from Within.


14 posted on 06/02/2005 6:24:58 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marty60; Grampa Dave; geedee; Blurblogger; Fedora; Donna Lee Nardo; swheats; SkyPilot; ...

Let's all get together and urge Ann Coulter to do an expose on this fraud Felt---that's a book that deserves to be written


15 posted on 06/02/2005 6:25:23 AM PDT by Liz (A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Liz

It's not like it was a really big secret who it was anyway. Bernstain's kid blabbed that it was Felt to friends something like 8 years ago...


16 posted on 06/02/2005 6:26:54 AM PDT by Axenolith (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

You got that right----this craven individual ---Felt--had a secret agenda. In fact, an expose of Felt will make Nixon look like the hero.


17 posted on 06/02/2005 6:27:12 AM PDT by Liz (A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Liz

It's telling that to Woodstein, a President lying to protect his people was a huge scandal, but a top FBI man leaking information to the press was not, nor did it qualify as big news.

Woodward and Bernstein belong in jail as well, IMHO.


18 posted on 06/02/2005 6:27:27 AM PDT by SerpentDove (Qwertyuiop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

That is funny.................:>)


19 posted on 06/02/2005 6:28:38 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Liz

"Let's all get together and urge Ann Coulter to do an expose on this fraud Felt---that's a book that deserves to be written."

Don't worry. I'm sure that some our side's best investigative writers are all ready knee deep in this mess.

We will see some outstanding op eds, articles and probably books as the BS is ripped away from Watergate.


20 posted on 06/02/2005 6:28:42 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

He better have lots of these ready.

21 posted on 06/02/2005 6:30:18 AM PDT by Liz (A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

No you be a stand up guy that cares about your country. Quit your job and have a presser. He allowed this country, in fact, he subjected this country to years of trauma and fear. (Remember the COLD WAR and USSR) He could have ended this in one minute. Yet his ultimate goal was to destroy NIXON. Nothing more nothing less.


22 posted on 06/02/2005 6:31:50 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Thanks, Gramps....we needed to hear that.


23 posted on 06/02/2005 6:31:54 AM PDT by Liz (A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Also, it is time to repost Ben Stein's oped to rebuke those rushing in to defend Felt.

Deep Throat and Genocide
The American Spectator ^ | 6-1-05 | Ben Stein


Posted on 06/01/2005 5:55:15 AM PDT by veronica


Re: The "news" that former FBI agent Mark Felt broke the law, broke his code of ethics, broke his oath and was the main source for Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward's articles that helped depose Richard Nixon, a few thoughts.

Can anyone even remember now what Nixon did that was so terrible? He ended the war in Vietnam, brought home the POW's, ended the war in the Mideast, opened relations with China, started the first nuclear weapons reduction treaty, saved Eretz Israel's life, started the Environmental Protection Administration. Does anyone remember what he did that was bad?

Oh, now I remember. He lied. He was a politician who lied. How remarkable. He lied to protect his subordinates who were covering up a ridiculous burglary that no one to this date has any clue about its purpose. He lied so he could stay in office and keep his agenda of peace going. That was his crime. He was a peacemaker and he wanted to make a world where there was a generation of peace. And he succeeded.

That is his legacy. He was a peacemaker. He was a lying, conniving, covering up peacemaker. He was not a lying, conniving drug addict like JFK, a lying, conniving war starter like LBJ, a lying conniving seducer like Clinton -- a lying conniving peacemaker. That is Nixon's kharma.

When his enemies brought him down, and they had been laying for him since he proved that Alger Hiss was a traitor, since Alger Hiss was their fair-haired boy, this is what they bought for themselves in the Kharma Supermarket that is life:

1.) The defeat of the South Vietnamese government with decades of death and hardship for the people of Vietnam.

2.) The assumption of power in Cambodia by the bloodiest government of all time, the Khmer Rouge, who killed a third of their own people, often by making children beat their own parents to death. No one doubts RN would never have let this happen.

So, this is the great boast of the enemies of Richard Nixon, including Mark Felt: they made the conditions necessary for the Cambodian genocide. If there is such a thing as kharma, if there is such a thing as justice in this life of the next, Mark Felt has bought himself the worst future of any man on this earth. And Bob Woodward is right behind him, with Ben Bradlee bringing up the rear. Out of their smug arrogance and contempt, they hatched the worst nightmare imaginable: genocide. I hope they are happy now -- because their future looks pretty bleak to me.

Ben Stein is a writer, actor, economist, and lawyer in Beverly Hills and Malibu, and author of "Ben Stein's Diary" each month in The American Spectator.


24 posted on 06/02/2005 6:33:03 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly
What Nixon did was quasi-legal. Any activities undertaken to keep the subversive demonrat party, the American wing of the international socialist movement out of office such as snooping through their offices is in defense of the Constitution of the United States of America.

In that case, why even call it "quasi-legal".
Big wheel keeps on spinning.....
25 posted on 06/02/2005 6:33:46 AM PDT by newcats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

How about going to the appropriate ranking member of the FBI's oversight committee? Going to a Democratic Senator - say Teddy the Whale?. How about holding an open press conference, with handouts, and then resigning? Mr. Felt did none of those things. And as one of Hoover's hatchetmen, he knew how to do ALL of them. The man's a worm, pure and simple. And Nixon's not Satan. Hell, he wasn't as corrupt as FDR, JFK, LBJ, RFK or B.U.B.B.A.


26 posted on 06/02/2005 6:33:55 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Liz

let's see...he wanted to possess one of the highest law enforcement offices in the united states,

but he broke the laws of this country.


and now, the leftist media paint him a hero?


27 posted on 06/02/2005 6:34:13 AM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Let's face it this mutt was one of the highest law enforcement officers in the land, 2nd in command of the FBI. He could have taken his info. to the special prosecutor or to the US Attorney for prosecution. Don't tell me he was afraid of Nixon, half the country wanted Nixon out. Instead he leaked info to Bernstein/Woodward.He was sworn to uphold the law and he betrayed the public trust, he's no better than Nixon. Had Nixon been a democrat the media would be painting an entirely different picture.


28 posted on 06/02/2005 6:39:43 AM PDT by KenmcG414
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

What about the fact that the truth got out? Doesn't anyone care about the truth anymore?


29 posted on 06/02/2005 6:51:19 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly

Shame Shame.. no better than the democrats you are.


30 posted on 06/02/2005 6:52:11 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Oh, really? There are standard operating procedures for reporting that the President, his Attorney General, and White House staff authorized a burglary, paid for it out of a secret slush fund, and then covered it up? Please tell me, I am all ears.

There was and is an independent internal organization within the Justice Department that was established just for that purpose, i.e., reporting misdeeds with the organization in anonymity. There were also channels in Congress.

If Felt was an honorable, principled person why did he go to the Press and still remain in his job. He could have resgigned. Why didn't he volunteer to appear before the Watergate commission (he had already retired by then)? The answers are obvious. Felt was a vindictive, cowardly bureaucrat who wanted to keep his job and subsequent pension and take down a President who selected someone else to head the FBI.

Felt was no mid-level bureaucrat afraid to speak out because of career aspirations or fear of retribution. He was the Deputy Director of the FBI--No. 2. The fact that he was privy to the material pertaining to the investigation of Watergate should have led to him recusing himself. He should have had the decency to resign as did a number of others like Elliot Richardson.

31 posted on 06/02/2005 6:59:30 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

I think Felt felt that the whole world would place laurels at his feet. Quite the opposite. As I posted on another thread, the demystifying of "Deep Throat" is a very good thing. And some vindication for the Nixon family.


32 posted on 06/02/2005 7:03:34 AM PDT by veronica (Never trust a Worm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Elliott Richardson resigned under pressure. He was ordered by Nixon to fire Archibald Cox, and refused.

I fail to see why resigning your job is appropriate if you want to blow the whistle on your employer, and even more so where, as here, the person you were blowing the whistle on was not even your employer. Felt was an employee of the United States government, not Nixon personally.

I know that after 1978, Inspector Generals were put in most federal agencies, and I don't believe that the FBI had an Inspector General department in 1972. Could be wrong about that, but I believe that there was no Inspector General's office for the FBI before 2001.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:SN01065:@@@L&summ2=m&


33 posted on 06/02/2005 7:09:27 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: KenmcG414

The US attorney, John Mitchell, authorized and paid for the Watergate break-in and was actively involved in the coverup.


34 posted on 06/02/2005 7:10:33 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Why "come out" now?? The Lefty media was looking for any reason to get Nixon's life and funeral out of the headlines after he died several years ago. In my mind, that would be the perfect opportunity to reveal himself. At that time he could probably have parlayed his 15 minutes of fame into a full 30 minutes, or more...
35 posted on 06/02/2005 7:15:10 AM PDT by Conservative Infidel (Only thing harder to find in US Senate these days than a Dem w/ a conscience is a Rep w/ a spine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Wasn't she pressured to lie about what she knew?
Also, if it was not for the blue dress covered in Prezidue, they would have just kept on lieing!


36 posted on 06/02/2005 7:15:51 AM PDT by Holicheese (Timmy like windmills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
How about the fact that what Nixon and his staff did was illegal?

Nixon, at his absolute worst, pales in comparison to what Clinton (and his ilk) did on an ongoing basis.

37 posted on 06/02/2005 7:17:59 AM PDT by Conservative Infidel (Only thing harder to find in US Senate these days than a Dem w/ a conscience is a Rep w/ a spine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I called him a partisan hack in the poll. I wasn't too sure what to call him. People said that the rats defended him when they wouldn't have defended a republican. i don't know. I'll say this. He was a leaker. And Clinton had the leakiest administration imaginable. That is poetic justice. He was a leaker... that should be a category of its own. If he hadn't had the code name of a famous (infamous?) porno movie, he would have been just another leaker among many.

Given all the skullduggery going on at that time I think I can understand his not wanting to go to the grand jury. As much as I dislike John Dean though, I respect him a lot more for actually testifying instead of slipping the shiv in Nixon's back in the dead of night.

Bottom lining it, I suppose Felt is a common criminal -- less than a whistleblower, less than a traitor, just scum. Just low-down scum like Sandy Berglar who should never have had a security clearance, much less been deputy director of the FBI.


38 posted on 06/02/2005 7:22:48 AM PDT by johnb838 ((thanks to those of you that post articles for me, the lowly commentator))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Nixon's major crime was loyalty to his friends.

As a result, he helped to cover up an investigation into wrongdoing.

He was threatened with impeachment by Democrats, who had an overwhelming majority, after much hounding by the Old Media - who were representing the communists who were still looking for an opportunity to avenge Nixon's bringing down Alger Hiss (as well as McCarthy's demeaning their Hollywood idols). Representatives of Nixon's party, Republicans, took a walk from the Capitol to the WH to ask in a private conversation that he resign.

Nixon further showed his loyalty to his friends and his country by resigning, instead of forcing the party and country to split in a raucous trial over this, though Nixon never believed his actions were wrong. In fact he believed that the state of war gave the executive branch the right to do what his subordinates did, though he never specifically authorized their ill-fated actions, andNixon even cited WW2 precedents.

An unbiased history of Watergate would include this, and you won't get that from most history books or the Old Media FRAUDcasters.


In addition, you probably will find it hard to locate the information that the US Atty Gen was well into an (grand jury?) investigation of the break-in before WP and MF "broke" the story in the media. MF ought to have gone to him and the judge with information he had, rather than doing what he did for his own aggrandizement.

Felt's illegal leaking of FBI files was due to avarice, not nobility.
39 posted on 06/02/2005 7:25:36 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Infidel

Felt kinda reminds me of another "hero" John McCain.


40 posted on 06/02/2005 7:26:19 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Liz
If Hollywood deigns to make a movie of this horror show, we should all flatout refuse to attend.

I would never go to a movie about this. It would be made for TV anyway, but I wouldn't watch. I found "all The Presidents Men" a snoozer at the time, I don't even think I finished it. Colson, Liddy, and Nixon were the only characters that weren't boring two-dim "men in gray flannel suits" anyway, and the rest was all depositions and paperwork. Colson has been on the talkies kvetching about having to go to prison but if he hadn't he probably wouldn't have found Christ and he might be on his way to hell now, and he's helped uncounted people since then since his was a sincere jailhouse conversion, so I suspect it was the best thing that ever happened to him.

41 posted on 06/02/2005 7:26:52 AM PDT by johnb838 ((thanks to those of you that post articles for me, the lowly commentator))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Tripp didn't spy on the president.


42 posted on 06/02/2005 7:27:17 AM PDT by johnb838 ((thanks to those of you that post articles for me, the lowly commentator))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

National security was more important than the letter of the law in those days. Would that it were today too since the letter of the law is twisted and ignored for political reasons now same as ever and the moral outrage is selective at best.


43 posted on 06/02/2005 7:29:10 AM PDT by johnb838 ((thanks to those of you that post articles for me, the lowly commentator))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnb838

That is one of those give thanks in all things items.


44 posted on 06/02/2005 7:38:49 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: johnb838

"National security"? You're arguing that the Watergate break-in to Democratic National Committee headquarters during a race for the presidency was motivated by the desire to protect national security?


45 posted on 06/02/2005 7:56:48 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Elliott Richardson resigned under pressure. He was ordered by Nixon to fire Archibald Cox, and refused.

He resigned as a matter of principle rather than do something he felt was wrong. Deputy Attorney General William D. Ruckelshaus also resgned when he was asked to do the same thing. Bork finally did fire Cox and paid for it later. Nixon also abolished the office of the special prosecutor and turned over to the Justice Department the entire responsibility for further investigation and prosecution of suspects and defendants in Watergate and related cases.

I fail to see why resigning your job is appropriate if you want to blow the whistle on your employer, and even more so where, as here, the person you were blowing the whistle on was not even your employer. Felt was an employee of the United States government, not Nixon personally.

Going to the media secretly is not exactly whistleblowing. As I indicated previously, there were other alternatives. Felt had access, by virtue of his position to privileged materials. Felt violated his own conditions of employment by releasing this information to unauthorized people.

Felt worked directly for the Director of the FBI. He had a boss, L. Patrick Gray, and should have gone to him first before the MSM. Gray was a USNA graduate and military officer. He understood concepts such as honor, duty, and country. The USG cannot function if every employee can decide unilaterally that he/she can release privileged/classified information to the MSM. There has to be consequences. Felt paid no price and is now being celebrated as a hero and stands to reap a bundle of money from his perfidy.

I know that after 1978, Inspector Generals were put in most federal agencies, and I don't believe that the FBI had an Inspector General department in 1972. Could be wrong about that, but I believe that there was no Inspector General's office for the FBI before 2001.

I wasn't referring to an IG office, which may or may not have been around in 1972. I heard a former FBI agent on a local radio show say that there was an independent office within the FBI to handle these types of issues and it existed during Felt's time.

46 posted on 06/02/2005 8:07:24 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Felt's daughter is a selfish baby-boomer who is looking for her 15 minutes of fame and a quick buck. Her father clearly broke the law, and he abused his office and power to get back at the Nixon administration for passing him over as FBI director. It's nice to know that, within the Felt household, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

""Uhh, Hi. Ummm, like, Mark Felt is my grandfather, and stuff. He was, like, and hero...and like, everything. Can I have $20.00?"

47 posted on 06/02/2005 8:10:25 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Heheh......nice post......words and pictures sum it all up.


48 posted on 06/02/2005 8:15:30 AM PDT by Liz (A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Liz

On Fox News this morning, they said Felt discovered wrong-doing in the Nixon administration and was so shocked that he went to Woodward, whom he had "coincidentally" met in the White House while Woodward was in the USN.

I call b**s*** on all this, because:

1. He was shocked by Nixon's acts, yet he could tolerate the crap that Saint JFK, cute little RFK and LBJ did?

2. He "just happened" to strike up a conversation with Woodward, who was waiting for some paperwork at the White House. So when he discovers this alleged wrong-doing, he ferrets out Woodward to spill the story to?

The libs who love to hate J. Edgar Hoover sure seem to see no fault in this man, obviously a crony of Hoover's.

BTW, the libs love to tell the story that Hoover was a homo, don't they? Have you ever known a deviant who didn't surround himself with other tainted individuals?


49 posted on 06/02/2005 8:18:32 AM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Felt and his family obviously subscribe to the Leftist Creed........Cashing-in On Victimization:


(Sob) Victimization is a liberal's basic belief by which they blame and find others responsible for their own personal failures, then expect taxpayers, deep-pocketed individuals, or the courts to bail them out.

Try to remember, that for a lib, it feels good to be in the throes of "victimization" and either A) causing victims, B) concocting victims, C) playing victim, D) commiserating over victims, or E) creating another class of victims to bleed over.


Sniffle.


50 posted on 06/02/2005 8:21:58 AM PDT by Liz (A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson