Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islam and the Liberal West: a Fatal Complementarity
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | June 2, 2005 | Lawrence Auster

Posted on 06/02/2005 7:02:11 PM PDT by rmlew

Declaring that some of the words used by Orianna Fallaci in her book about Islam were "without doubt offensive to Islam and to those who practice that religious faith," an Italian judge has ordered her to stand trial for anti-Islamic defamation. Meanwhile, Condoleezza Rice has in effect accused all of America of anti-Islamic defamation, saying that a single mishandling by a single U.S. serviceman of a single copy of the Koran is a terrible offense that tarnishes the image of our country. Yet even as our Secretary of State condemns America for its bigotry, the Saudi government funds the massive distribution of anti-American hate literature at U.S. mosques—and the Saudi Crown Prince, far from being criticized, let alone indicted, for spreading defamation of Christians and Jews, is invited to President Bush’s ranch for a chummy get-together. At the same time, the main cleric of the Palestinian Authority issues Hitlerian calls for the utter destruction of America and the Jews—and Secretary Rice praises the Palestinians for their march to peace and democracy and the U.S. government gives the Palestinians hundreds of millions more in U.S. taxpayer dollars.

People have pointed to all this recent kow-towing to Muslims as evidence of dhimmitude, the subjection of non-Muslims to a humiliated, second-class status under Muslim rule. But looking at the total pattern described above, I wonder if dhimmitude is an adequate description of it. The condition of dhimmitude, as miserable as it is, is relatively straightforward: dhimmis have no power, they're in a defeated, subordinate position, and they have no choice but to accept the harsh treatment meted out to them by their Muslim overlords. But what we have now is in a sense worse than dhimmitude. After all, we are the more powerful party. We are the ones who bestride the world like a colossus. We are the country that arrogantly or idealistically claims to be setting standards for all the nations of the earth. And yet, from our superior position of unquestioned military power and insufferable moral pretentiousness, we engage in a vicious double standard against ourselves, in which we condemn and punish our fellow Westerners for using critical language about Islam (let us remember that Americans as well as Europeans have been threatened with legal action for condemning Islam), while we reward our Muslim enemies who are openly engaged in a war of vilification and civilizational destruction against us.

What is it that leads us to accept the use of this spectacular double standard against ourselves? Why are we rushing to surrender to those who hate us and everything we cherish?

The answer is simple. In resurgent Islam the liberal West has met its fate. Islam is a non-Western religion set on conquering and converting non-Muslims, while liberalism is a Western ideology set on tolerating and including non-Westerners. They are predators, we are prey. This complementarity spells the death of the West, unless there is a radical awakening on our part to the true nature of Islam and a willingness to oppose it.

But there's a further twist to this complementarity that makes it even harder for us to extricate ourselves from the dhimmi-like trap in which our own ideology has placed us.

As I said, Muslims seek to turn the whole human race into Muslims. We are the demonic and tempting Other, whom they must subvert and convert, and against whom any deception or double standard that may be used to accomplish those ends is sanctioned by God. But liberal Westerners and particularly liberal Americans (which, when we understand the word "liberal" correctly, means basically all Americans, including most conservatives) remain for the most part indefeasibly naïve about the nature and goals of Islam. We imagine that the Muslims—except for a "tiny minority" of extremists—are more-or-less similar to ourselves, citizens-in-making of a democratic world order. Just as the Muslims' hard-boiled view of us as the infidel Other stems from their very being and faith as Muslims, liberal Americans' naïve view of the Muslims as people "just like us" stems from our very being and faith as liberal Americans. Being a liberal American means being non-judgmental of other cultures and civilizations, seeing other people as individuals, and putting group differences into the background.

For our liberal American identity to be sustainable, we must go on believing that all people are essentially like us. If we became convinced that a billion Muslims are not like us but are irreconcilably different from us and dangerous to us, then, instead of being open and accepting toward them, we would have to become closed and defensive. We would lose our very being as liberal Americans, as well as our hope of a harmonious, unified, equal world. And that is why we stubbornly ignore the Muslims' actual qualities. We don't do it simply because we are "naïve." We do it in order to maintain our own identity, our liberal identity which is based on our believing that humanity consists of nice people like ourselves, and that discrimination against anyone on the basis of religion, nationality, or ethnicity is always wrong.

We thus have a false view of our own motives, which Sartre would have called bad faith. We think that we disregard other people's negative qualities out of unselfish generosity and tolerance. In reality, we are pursuing an imperial impulse, constructing an image of an Americanist world in which everyone is at least potentially an American, reasonable and easy-going like ourselves, and in which discrimination is therefore unnecessary. But—the final irony—our imperial agenda is leading to our dhimmi-like subjection to the Muslims' imperial agenda, since our empire is an empire of tolerance and inclusion in which we must open our arms to merciless world-conquering jihadists.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: auster; clashofcivs; dhimmi; lawrence; lawrenceauster; politicaltheory; rop; sociopolitics

1 posted on 06/02/2005 7:02:12 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Lawrence Auster is the author of Erasing America: The Politics of the Borderless Nation. He offers a traditionalist conservative perspective at View from the Right.
2 posted on 06/02/2005 7:03:08 PM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

The best way to end war and ensure peace is to kill the enemy.


3 posted on 06/02/2005 7:05:21 PM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (Buy 'Allah' brand urinal cakes - If you can't kill the enemy at least you can piss on their god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc; Cacique; Paleo Conservative; Clemenza; SJackson; dennisw

Ping


4 posted on 06/02/2005 7:05:29 PM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba

Unfortunately, most Americans are unwilling to accept the totality of our enemy.


5 posted on 06/02/2005 7:12:03 PM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Declaring that some of the words used by Orianna Fallaci in her book about Islam were "without doubt offensive to Islam and to those who practice that religious faith," an Italian judge has ordered her to stand trial for anti-Islamic defamation.

Since when is being offensive against the law?? If that's the case then I want all the secularists to stand trial for defamation of people of faith, I want all the secularist to stand trial for offending me and my opinion about my faith, I want all the democrats to stand trial for the offensive language regarding 9/11...

When will people of good conscience stand-up and stop this lunacy?

6 posted on 06/02/2005 7:12:10 PM PDT by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
It matters not one whit what the great center that lives in that famed Egyptian river thinks. It is elites that rule an vie for power. Our only hope is that the pendulum swings to our side. I see this period as comaparble to the thrities when most Europeans and even some americans thought the Nazis benign. At some point came the realization there were no moderate Nazis and that they had to be destroyed totally.

I hope the same will hold true for Muslims, the realization that there are no moderate muslims and that our survival will depend on the total destruction of islam as a force in the world.



7 posted on 06/02/2005 7:20:55 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Cacique

The realization that you are talking about better happen very SOON, because there is another thread that talks about the NEW islamic jihadist groups in Europe ---acting like Al-queda, but not associated with any main group---

This is quickly getting out of hand, IMHO, and mighty military or not, if our military isn't given enough rein to actually BEAT THE HELL out of the muslims, then they are NOT going to go away...they have "won" too many victorys--in the USA and against the mighty USA...

Anyone who doesn't know how scared you should be, should watch any of the replays that C-span might show of the Progressive convention that has been in Wash. for the last 2 days...THOSE people would bargain away their first-born children if they thought it would bring "peace"...and would get us out of Iraq...


9 posted on 06/02/2005 7:35:25 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I wonder if the Muslims will ever advance to the stage where they live in caves and beat each other over the head with clubs. Progress sure has been slow in that part of the world (well, I guess they gave us '0', literally and almost figuratively).

The left will hopefully soon see that tolerance of the islamofascists is not acceptable - they belong in the same group as the Klan, neo-nazi skinheads, and other subhuman trash. My (not so heartfelt) apologies to skinheads.
10 posted on 06/02/2005 7:49:44 PM PDT by Atheist_Canadian_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
I hope the same will hold true for Muslims, the realization that there are no moderate muslims and that our survival will depend on the total destruction of islam as a force in the world.

Right on cacique. It's amazing how our national leadership fails to recognize islam for what it is: a cruel, sadistic medieval cult that poses the greatest threat to peace in the world AND must be destroyed.

11 posted on 06/02/2005 8:14:21 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

I've recently become a fan...Thanks for the post!


12 posted on 06/02/2005 8:27:10 PM PDT by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
can you point me to those threads?



13 posted on 06/02/2005 8:52:52 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I don't think the Moozies will have much impact on American society. Unlike the disarmed Euro-sissies who bend over and take what they're given, we Americans will only tolerate so much before we snap.

History shows that there are no enemies more deadly than armed Americans in a scrap.

14 posted on 06/02/2005 8:58:42 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Unfortunately, most Americans are unwilling to accept the totality of our enemy.

I'm of the opinion that more Americans than you might think accept it, but are generally too polite to speak their minds. Either that, or they're scared to death of being pilloried as "racists" by the multi-culti pimps.

15 posted on 06/02/2005 9:01:43 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Great stuff - thanks!


16 posted on 06/02/2005 9:03:32 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
"If we became convinced that a billion Muslims are not like us but are irreconcilably different from us and dangerous to us, then, instead of being open and accepting toward them, we would have to become closed and defensive."

Why is that exactly? Because it doesn't follow. I think the first, without thinking the second.

The missing minor premise is that no one could possibly tolerate an irreconcilably different and dangerous pack of neighbors. But I do it every day. Remarkably few of you are anything like me, nearly all of you are quite dangerous - some more than others it is true. But I do not attempt to live in a mythical world without danger. I live in danger as I live in the corporeal world. It makes courage a virtue, not annihilation of others a necessity. It means I am willing to fight whenever the occasion for it arises, not that I am "closed and defensive".

See, the left only has this problem because they are trying to construct a pacifist existence in a world with real differences and dangerous men. It is the pacifism that is in contradiction with those things, not tolerance. I am perfectly open and accepting of the fact that Muslims are Muslims and wrong, that great bogs of them are unjust, that some of them are even dangerous (while lots of others wish they were, but are impotent).

The left actually only accepts tolerance as a virtue because they are trying to arrive at a mythic state of peace in which all danger has disappeared. Hence this writer's confusion - he thinks tolerance is only chosen if it results in peace, or that safety is the only good to aim at. I tolerate because I recognize the universal state of error mankind is sunk in. I do not remotely think it magically creates safety. I know perfectly well that only strength and courage create safety.

I just also know that intolerance does not bring any increase in strength. Look at those who organize their societies around its absence, and around brutality. They are mostly poor as dust, ignorant, incapable of any lasting achievement, they live off our discarded scraps of technology and any wealth they have comes from us. Why would I want to imitate their stupidities and injustices?

17 posted on 06/02/2005 9:07:37 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Read later


18 posted on 06/02/2005 9:11:09 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Steel Bonnets Over the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Read later


19 posted on 06/02/2005 9:45:08 PM PDT by Gforce11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
When will people of good conscience stand-up and stop this lunacy?
Remember Pim Fortyn?
20 posted on 06/02/2005 9:54:46 PM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka

While I certainly hope that your asessment of Americans' courage is true, I don't think we're really that much better off than the Euroweasels. What, exactly, would it take for us to "snap" (to our senses) - since full passenger planes being flown into skyscrapers wasn't quite enough, evidently? A nuke?

Yes, it's true that those in some states we are better armed than the Euroweasels, but the second amendment is seriously compromised as it stands: State militias were essentially abolished via federalization; and the citizenry is effectively denied access to the same weaponry as the military or police (or the jihadis and drug gangs, for that matter). At the same time, there is no limit to the number of Muslims who can come here through the various immigration and refugee programs nor is there any effort to discourage them from coming or even expel those here illegally.

Auster's point is that we cannot prevail against the jihadis as long as we continue to embrace essential liberalism - the idea that the Muslims are basically just the same as we are, that Sheikdoms can be transformed into a Swedish-style utopian welfare-state with the infusion of billiions of tax dollars and free elections. Until we reject liberalism and embrace the concept that our own (traditional) nation/culture is far superior to Islam and is worthy of defending against Muslim conquest - the very essence of discrimination - we will continue to lose ground.


21 posted on 06/02/2005 10:00:52 PM PDT by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lainde
I've recently become a fan...Thanks for the post!
Of what; Frontpage Magazine, Lawrence Auster and his blog View From the Right, or me and my nascent one, NYC Right?
22 posted on 06/02/2005 11:26:50 PM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka
Look at approval ratings for the Iraq war this year.
The Ameircan people have no tolerance for casualties.
23 posted on 06/02/2005 11:27:54 PM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson