Skip to comments.
Drug Czar Favors Testing Teens
Miami Herald ^
| June 4, 2005
Posted on 06/04/2005 6:06:50 PM PDT by Wolfie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: SpaceBar
Sounds like the "cigarette ploy". Remember that? The do-gooder lefties only wanted to stop cigarette smoking on "domestic flights shorter than...yada, yada, yada"!
Where'd that wind up? Christ, I think that they've got it now to where it's illegal to smoke in your own house in some places.
21
posted on
06/04/2005 6:50:20 PM PDT
by
skimbell
To: Lizavetta
Until they show they are serious about this by testing every single person employed by
any governmental body all the way from the President of the United States right down to the local dog catcher, they can just shut up about drug tests of any kind.
These statists are pushing their agenda by indoctrinating kids into accepting the notion that it's O.K. for the government to tell you to piss into a jar on demand. Once the kids think it's a-ok to do this without any probably cause whatsover, you're less than a generation away from some really evil stuff IMO.
In the name of full disclosure: If someone were to strap me down (because that's the only way this will happen) and extract a blood or urine sample from me, the only thing they'll find are traces of ibupropen (advil), and caffeine levels that would kill a medium-sized elephant.
22
posted on
06/04/2005 6:52:14 PM PDT
by
zeugma
(Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies!)
To: Lizavetta
I insist that all journalists, who report on this drug testing, also be drug tested.
To: Wolfie
What a joke. A "conservative" government official doesn't see anything wrong with forcing minors to provide the government with their bodily fluids to prove they aren't doing anything wrong?
This seems like one issue where liberals and most real conservatives would both be outraged. Unfortunately, I worry that there's such a divide that those two groups aren't even willing to talk, let alone work together, at a grassroots level.
24
posted on
06/04/2005 6:54:01 PM PDT
by
Turbopilot
(Viva la Reagan Revolucion!)
To: Sir Gawain
The crazy thing is, if you posted this on DU, you'd get substantially the same reaction you're getting here. It's maybe the ONE thing both sides agree on. So I have to ask, where's the constituency for this drug war BS?
25
posted on
06/04/2005 6:54:14 PM PDT
by
kms61
To: skimbell
I'm going to rewrite my original post with a few changes...
The pattern by which governments erode rights is to start with a subset of the population that garner little sympathy. Flood the popular media with images of troll-like bloggers surfing political websites. Every other story is about politics and online news forums causing trouble. Get middle america to resent them and demand a solution. Then drop the ax. Goodbye America. It was fun.
26
posted on
06/04/2005 6:57:42 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: Wolfie
"The question is: Why not apply this to young people?" Because by 2008 there will be a large number of annoyed new voters wanting payback on this "public tool" and will then vote for Hillary.
27
posted on
06/04/2005 7:07:06 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(We shall yet make these United States a Moral Nation - The Rev. Elmer Gantry)
To: Oztrich Boy
You put your finger on it:
Bush is losing core voters. Not solving immigration. Making good taxpayers bend over for the TSA anal probe, and now their children forced to pee in a jar for the government to test.
Woo hoo! THAT will make you crawl across broken glass to vote Republican, eh?
To: Wolfie
There's a simpler way to protect kids against other people's drug-dealing kids: Abolish government schools.
To: Wolfie
is this another one of those chain smoking drug czars?
30
posted on
06/04/2005 7:21:28 PM PDT
by
bigsigh
To: Wolfie
If school boards institute random drug testing in the public schools, the use of illegal drugs among teens would be sharply reduced, said John Walters, the director of National Drug Control Policy.I'm all for it. If adopted, the use of government schools would be sharply reduced.
31
posted on
06/04/2005 7:22:10 PM PDT
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
What you said!
Paging Ron Kuby....Paging Ron Kuby... the VRWC needs your help to protect our kids!
32
posted on
06/04/2005 7:23:34 PM PDT
by
jocon307
To: kms61
"So I have to ask, where's the constituency for this drug war BS?"
Er, that would be the dirty politicians as my Irish Grandma termed them.
33
posted on
06/04/2005 7:26:26 PM PDT
by
jocon307
To: kms61
So I have to ask, where's the constituency for this drug war BS? I'm certain the "All Dopers Should Be Hung And If You Don't Agree You Are A Morally Vacant LIBERALterian!" crowd will mosey on by shortly.
34
posted on
06/04/2005 7:31:20 PM PDT
by
Drew68
(IYAOYAS! Semper Gumby!)
To: Sir Gawain
I must confess,the title of Drug Fuehrer has a certain ring to it.
35
posted on
06/04/2005 7:34:54 PM PDT
by
11B40
To: Wolfie
"Conservatives" can scare me, and sometimes even more than "liberals". And I fancy myself a proud conservative.
Maybe we don't want to be to big a party. Maybe you have to dilute the values too much to attract everyone to join.
People talk about the founding fathers and their intent when it suits their purpose. I cannot imagine that our founding fathers would want this in any way shape or form.
And what is the next logical step? I am not sure. Why not test everyone? And once you test positive, that is proof that you have broken the law. You are a criminal. Doesn't that mean fines, confiscation of private property and jail time? How could it not? You would be a criminal if you tested positive.
What happened to the party of smaller government?
To: robertpaulsen
some more nonsense by your likeminded thinkers.
37
posted on
06/04/2005 7:58:56 PM PDT
by
bigsigh
To: Wolfie
If school boards institute random drug testing in the public schools, the use of illegal drugs among teens would be sharply reduced, said John Walters, the director of National Drug Control Policy.If these gestapo wannabees would shut down the border to illegal aliens, the use of illegal drugs among teens would be sharply reduced, says the average grade schooled American citizen...
38
posted on
06/04/2005 8:15:49 PM PDT
by
Iscool
(You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailer park!!!)
To: bigsigh
Nonsense? The author made a good point -- workplaces test employees for drugs. I assume you agree with that policy, correct?
Why not schools? Don't the taxpayers have a right to see that their hard-earned money is well spent on educating sober and drug free students?
You don't want to be tested? Fine. Then stop sucking the public teat and find a private school that doesn't test. Or homeschool. There are options.
To: Drew68
I'm certain the "All Dopers Should Be Hung And If You Don't Agree You Are A Morally Vacant LIBERALterian!" crowd will mosey on by shortly.
You know, I've seen that kind of post on various threads. I think a lot of the problem is that drugs can be detected through testing of bodily fluids. If it were possible to detect homosexuality, abortions, flag-burning, or Islamofascism via a urine test, and the government started insisting that good citizens take those tests to prove their "innocence", our so-called "social conservatives" would be marching on Washington.
40
posted on
06/04/2005 8:23:18 PM PDT
by
Turbopilot
(Viva la Reagan Revolucion!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson