Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Constitution, version 2.0
World Net Daily ^ | June 4, 2005 | Alan Sears

Posted on 06/04/2005 7:39:14 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie

During the next 15 years, the United States could see some incredible transformations. Every young adult would be given $80,000 via a new tax on the "rich." Felons would be allowed to vote. A second Bill of Rights would be instituted, complete with a slew of new entitlements to ensure social and economic "equality." And most amazingly, no one will need – or even be allowed – to vote on these sweeping changes. Unelected judges could simply mandate each of them – for our own good, of course.

None of these changes are inevitable, but lest you chalk it all up as alarmist hype, an influential group of legal scholars seeks to make these things – and more – a reality.

In April, Yale Law School's chapter of the American Constitutional Society sponsored a conference titled "The Constitution in 2020." The event was designed to foster leftist policies into being, with the consent of neither voters nor elected officials. Perhaps this strategy should be expected in light of the desperation of many leftist politicians to remain in office these days. Not surprisingly, one of the conference's main financial backers was left-leaning and Bush-bashing international financier George Soros.

The first sentence of the conference description stated the goal forthrightly: "It is time for progressives to set a constitutional agenda for the 21st century." Yale law professor and opening speaker Bruce Ackerman revealed how sweeping their dream agenda could extend.

The professor promoted taxing the "wealthy" to create a "citizenship inheritance" of $80,000 for every young adult to use as each sees fit. In addition, Ackerman and other conference speakers believe that we as a nation need convicted murderers, rapists and other felons to help us select our leaders at the ballot box.

Harvard Law's Martha Minow agreed.

"For the politically unpopular and disenfranchised – including detained immigrants, children and literally disenfranchised ex-convicts – we do need to ramp up affirmative constitutional aid," she urged.

But affirmative action for felons and non-citizens wasn't enough for some. University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein insisted that even more progressive "constitutional interpretation" was required.

"It is important to be clear on what is meant by 'the Constitution,'" he said, churning up thankfully forgotten days when we wondered what the meaning of the word "is" is. "That idea could of course be limited to what is technically part of constitutional law as the Supreme Court understands it. Much more ambitiously, it could include anything deemed 'constitutive' of national commitments and principles."

And which "commitments and principles" is Sunstein referring to? Well, leftist ones, of course.

The professor referred at length to former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's proposed "Second Bill of Rights," which would invent bizarre, socialistic governmental guarantees our Founding Fathers never could have dreamed of.

Rights to a well-paying job, housing, health care, education, recreation and even freedom from "unfair competition" are included in this imagined constitution. No mention, of course, is made of the destruction of our nation's economic engine in the process.

While the original Bill of Rights set limits on the government, the Bill of Rights "the Sequel" would grant the state inconceivable authority to intervene in every sector of our lives.

If brought to the electorate, this breathtaking expansion of state power would be emphatically laughed out of town halls from Arizona to Vermont. But while the proposals seem outlandish today, government-sanctioned abortion and same-sex "marriage" seemed equally outlandish before being fabricated by some members of an unelected judiciary.

The sad truth is that, practically speaking, the only impediment these days to government-enforced recreation and nationwide salary caps is the interpretation of one more runaway Supreme Court decision. And if this effort is allowed to prevail, the results will be with us for a very long time.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billofrights; constitution; judges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2005 7:39:14 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

We really need another Senator Joe McCarthy.


2 posted on 06/04/2005 7:43:05 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

You do have a point there....


3 posted on 06/04/2005 7:44:28 PM PDT by thebaron512
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

""citizenship inheritance" of $80,000 for every young adult to use as each sees fit"

Communism is idiocy. They want to divide up the property. Suppose they did it -- it requires brains to keep money as well as make it. In a precious little while the money would be back in the former owner's hands and the communist would be poor again. - Mark Twain, a Biography

4 posted on 06/04/2005 7:45:29 PM PDT by Honcho Bongs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

The founding fathers are rolling in their graves :(


5 posted on 06/04/2005 7:49:38 PM PDT by Crazieman (If Con is the opposite of Pro, what is the opposite of Progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
The founding fathers are rolling in their graves

Yes, but expecially because the people with those lunatic ideas are considered the intelligent among the masses.

6 posted on 06/04/2005 7:57:27 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: 26lemoncharlie

In 15 years, we won't be worrying about any of that.
We'll be at war with red China then.


8 posted on 06/04/2005 8:24:58 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; Neets; Darksheare; scott0347; timpad; Conspiracy Guy; NYC GOP Chick; MeekOneGOP; ...

and, a final ping before retiring: THIS is bloody awful


9 posted on 06/05/2005 12:05:56 AM PDT by King Prout (RG'OIHGV 08 YAEGRKoirliha35u9p089 y5gep'iojq5g353hat5eohiahetb98 ye5po)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Conservative_Chinese
Yes, we certainly need McCarthy back.

I second that motion!

10 posted on 06/05/2005 12:13:41 AM PDT by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

OMG....and a moronic newbie, on another thread, keeps arguing about how it's no big deal that the president hasn't been able to get his judicial nominees through the Senate and that the "compromise" is actually a good deal.


11 posted on 06/05/2005 12:57:38 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
Just last week I asked an attorney friend (a rare conservative) what was covered in his law school's course on the Constitution.

The short of it is that they do not study the Constitution but rather what the Supremes have contorted our Constitution into.

All law schools start with Mabry v. Madison in which SCOTUS hijacked the power of judicial veto of our federal laws. Students study case law from there on. They learn about penumbras and emanations and why burning Old Glory is protected political speech yet criticizing an incumbent pol in print within 60 days of an election is not.

Imagine studying physics without Newton or literature without Shakespeare.

After four years of undergrad where students wallow in the phony wisdom of Karl Marx, they never study our nation's founding document.

Is it a wonder at all that we are headed for judicial tyranny?
12 posted on 06/05/2005 4:27:39 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Democrats soil the institutions they control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
These nutcases are clearly on drugs...

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

13 posted on 06/05/2005 7:11:48 AM PDT by mhking (The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
There's alot of it going on right now through supplemental social security payments. I see it all the time. Able bodied adults taking from SSA and some of them even think they work for the government. It's out of control.
14 posted on 06/05/2005 7:16:58 AM PDT by b4its2late (I saw a woman wearing a sweat shirt with "Guess" on it. So I said "Implants?" She hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; b4its2late

It makes it kind of confusing as to where do we start "Loping Off the Heads"!?? I gues anyplace as long as we start!


15 posted on 06/05/2005 7:49:21 AM PDT by 26lemoncharlie ('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
Confiscation of all "inheritance" would go a long way to accomplishing their goals of giving every American and visitor their "right" to free healthcare.

But you gotta eat so every American (and visitor) will also have a "right" to free food.

You gotta have a place to sleep, ergo the right to free lodging.

And lest anything think I am joking, there "is" a right to transportation. Those emissions tests you have for your car include subsidies for those who cannot afford a better car. Just as you internet tax brings computers to poor people (although I've NEVER heard of how this plan works or when the market will be "saturated").

To pay for all of these entitlements, er rights, the government will hereby garnish all of your wages and allocate them as they see fit. After all the Clintons told us that we would just waste our money anyway.

16 posted on 06/05/2005 8:18:39 AM PDT by weegee (Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

To pay for all of these entitlements, er rights, the government will hereby garnish all of your wages and allocate them as they see fit. After all the Clintons told us that we would just waste our money anyway.
_________________________________________
And we know the Klintons are always right!!


17 posted on 06/05/2005 8:56:23 AM PDT by 26lemoncharlie ('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Honcho Bongs
Mark Twain, a Biography

A fool and his money were lucky to get together.

18 posted on 06/05/2005 10:06:53 AM PDT by groanup (http://fairtax.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie; Howlin; Timesink; Utah Girl; hosepipe; backhoe; FITZ; Happy2BMe; ...

Ping

been telling ya for a few years now and guess what there it is .


19 posted on 06/05/2005 11:55:15 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
[ been telling ya for a few years now and guess what there it is .]

New Constitution Version II will not be any more valid the one presently being subverted..

The threat of revolution by an armed populace is now and has always been the ONLY guarantor of "the People" and their "rights"... Big difference between "rights" and gov't granted privileges.. Our rights have been stolen and replaced by privileges and it has been getting worse for a hundred years.. Nothing new here..

When "the People" are too much of a coward to exercise that "RIGHT"(2nd amendment).. then the constitution is a small matter anyway.. Then ALL discussions about rights is merely bitching by whiners..

Do you know ANY say, republican, that would turn down a government check.?.
See what I mean.. No, or few principled people left..

20 posted on 06/05/2005 12:16:25 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson