Skip to comments.
Japan's birth rate remains at record low
WebIndia123.com ^
| Wednesday, June 1, 2005
Posted on 06/07/2005 1:00:31 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
The fertility rate of Japanese women in 2004 remained at the record low of 1.29 children per woman, the same as the previous year, a survey showed.
A population survey report issued by Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare showed that, when taken to the third decimal place, the rate was actually slightly below 1.29 last year, and slightly above in 2003, the Mainichi Shimbun reported Wednesday.
The results show that the rate is continuing to decline, which will force the government to continue to devise measures to counter the trend.
In an estimate released by the ministry in January, the number of births in Japan in 2004 was calculated at 1,107,000, a drop of 17,000 compared to the previous year.
Since the birthrate per 100 people was also 0.1 points lower than the previous year, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare had said there was a possibility that the total fertility rate would fall below 1.29.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Japan
KEYWORDS: birthrate; japan; low
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: MinorityRepublican
Population is?
50 years ago they thought 90 million was intolerable and they were all going to suffocate. What is it now?
2
posted on
06/07/2005 1:03:04 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Bush got better grades than Kerry)
To: MinorityRepublican
Too much sushi will do it.........
3
posted on
06/07/2005 1:03:12 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(It's not up to the gov't to give you an education. It's up to you to take it from them......)
To: MinorityRepublican
At least the Japanese culture will continue - they have very tough immigration laws that are enforced...
4
posted on
06/07/2005 1:04:08 PM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: MinorityRepublican
quote "which will force the government to continue to devise measures to counter the trend"
um... try outlawing abortion ... and the birthrate will skyrocket.
5
posted on
06/07/2005 1:05:05 PM PDT
by
Nyboe
(From God we receive both our freedom and morality. A Godless society will have neither.)
To: MinorityRepublican
Keep that up and China will wait until the Japanese population gets very low and take over the island.
6
posted on
06/07/2005 1:06:48 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: MinorityRepublican
"which will force the government to continue to devise measures to counter the trend"
It's o.k., help is on the way! These guys will turn it around.
7
posted on
06/07/2005 1:09:07 PM PDT
by
Shortwave
(Ted Kennedy’s rhetoric has killed more American soldiers than his car has killed women.)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: MinorityRepublican
"The fertility rate of Japanese women in 2004 remained at the record low of 1.29 children per woman, the same as the previous year, a survey showed."
That's a record low? Even if you could get pregnant immediately after giving birth, if the mother brought the baby to full term, that would be a fertility rate of 1.33. Are all Japanese women pregnant all the time?
9
posted on
06/07/2005 1:11:34 PM PDT
by
Moral Hazard
(Unfortunately the Golden Rule doesn't apply to sex.)
To: Shortwave; maikeru; Dr. Marten; Eric in the Ozarks; Al Gator; snowsislander; sushiman; ...
Awesome picture! And that's exactly the issue, Japanese women don't want to get married and have babies (with Japanese men) like they used to. Most Japanese women married to non-Japanese men, that I know if, have more than "1.29" children.
Japan * ping * (kono risuto ni hairitai ka detai wo shirasete kudasai : let me know if you want on or off this list)
10
posted on
06/07/2005 1:15:22 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: Uhhuh35
Japanese women are expected to be married by age 30, 35 at the latest, then stay at home. Young ladies have been fighting this cultural ideal for a few decades now. 30? 35? That's on the verge of becoming old maids. Darn well better get married by then!
11
posted on
06/07/2005 1:18:48 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(Defeat Pat DeWine, RINO Mike DeWine's son! Tom Brinkman for Congress http://www.gobrinkman.com/)
To: Moral Hazard
The total fertility rate is the average number of children born to a woman over her entire lifetime, not each year. 2.1 is considered to be the replacement rate where population will be stable. Below this population falls without immigration to make up for the shortfall. Japan has little immigration.
To: JohnnyZ
30? 35? That's on the verge of becoming old maids. Darn well better get married by then!The best time for women to get married is usually before they turn 25. After that, the chances of them getting married as well as being pregnant decreases significantly.
To: green iguana
"The total fertility rate is the average number of children born to a woman over her entire lifetime, not each year. 2.1 is considered to be the replacement rate where population will be stable. Below this population falls without immigration to make up for the shortfall. Japan has little immigration."
Yes, I know, but the way the article was written it sounded like it was annual, so I was imagining what things would be like if actually were annual.
14
posted on
06/07/2005 1:26:33 PM PDT
by
Moral Hazard
(Unfortunately the Golden Rule doesn't apply to sex.)
To: MinorityRepublican
Could this explain the problem?
To: MinorityRepublican
I'm helping a lot with this problem, these days...
16
posted on
06/07/2005 1:30:31 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: MinorityRepublican; snarks_when_bored
On the other hand (so to speak)...
To: snarks_when_bored
18
posted on
06/07/2005 1:31:35 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: MinorityRepublican
Native born american women have been below zero population growth since 1970. If Japan wants to overcrowd itself like the United States wants, then all it has to do is to copy our immigration policies. Maybe Japan doesnt want to overpopulate its country? Maybe it wants to keep its culture?
Personally, I wouldnt mind it if we had stayed at 200 million, no traffic, no bilingual, lots of farms, fields and woods to hunt in, etc. But I am in the minority, and most americans want congestion and huge never ending increases in population.
19
posted on
06/07/2005 1:40:25 PM PDT
by
SandyB
To: SandyB
One word- Godzilla. That is the cause, well other than President Bush. Blame must be assigned and Godzilla or Bush are the reason.
20
posted on
06/07/2005 1:42:41 PM PDT
by
possumdawg
(There are three types of people- those that can count and those who cannot)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson