Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan's birth rate remains at record low
WebIndia123.com ^ | Wednesday, June 1, 2005

Posted on 06/07/2005 1:00:31 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

The fertility rate of Japanese women in 2004 remained at the record low of 1.29 children per woman, the same as the previous year, a survey showed.

A population survey report issued by Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare showed that, when taken to the third decimal place, the rate was actually slightly below 1.29 last year, and slightly above in 2003, the Mainichi Shimbun reported Wednesday.

The results show that the rate is continuing to decline, which will force the government to continue to devise measures to counter the trend.

In an estimate released by the ministry in January, the number of births in Japan in 2004 was calculated at 1,107,000, a drop of 17,000 compared to the previous year.

Since the birthrate per 100 people was also 0.1 points lower than the previous year, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare had said there was a possibility that the total fertility rate would fall below 1.29.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Japan
KEYWORDS: birthrate; japan; low
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2005 1:00:32 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Population is?

50 years ago they thought 90 million was intolerable and they were all going to suffocate. What is it now?

2 posted on 06/07/2005 1:03:04 PM PDT by RightWhale (Bush got better grades than Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Too much sushi will do it.........


3 posted on 06/07/2005 1:03:12 PM PDT by Red Badger (It's not up to the gov't to give you an education. It's up to you to take it from them......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
At least the Japanese culture will continue - they have very tough immigration laws that are enforced...
4 posted on 06/07/2005 1:04:08 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

quote "which will force the government to continue to devise measures to counter the trend"

um... try outlawing abortion ... and the birthrate will skyrocket.


5 posted on 06/07/2005 1:05:05 PM PDT by Nyboe (From God we receive both our freedom and morality. A Godless society will have neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Keep that up and China will wait until the Japanese population gets very low and take over the island.


6 posted on 06/07/2005 1:06:48 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
"which will force the government to continue to devise measures to counter the trend"

It's o.k., help is on the way! These guys will turn it around.


7 posted on 06/07/2005 1:09:07 PM PDT by Shortwave (Ted Kennedy’s rhetoric has killed more American soldiers than his car has killed women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: MinorityRepublican

"The fertility rate of Japanese women in 2004 remained at the record low of 1.29 children per woman, the same as the previous year, a survey showed."

That's a record low? Even if you could get pregnant immediately after giving birth, if the mother brought the baby to full term, that would be a fertility rate of 1.33. Are all Japanese women pregnant all the time?


9 posted on 06/07/2005 1:11:34 PM PDT by Moral Hazard (Unfortunately the Golden Rule doesn't apply to sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shortwave; maikeru; Dr. Marten; Eric in the Ozarks; Al Gator; snowsislander; sushiman; ...
Awesome picture! And that's exactly the issue, Japanese women don't want to get married and have babies (with Japanese men) like they used to. Most Japanese women married to non-Japanese men, that I know if, have more than "1.29" children.

Japan * ping * (kono risuto ni hairitai ka detai wo shirasete kudasai : let me know if you want on or off this list)

10 posted on 06/07/2005 1:15:22 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Uhhuh35
Japanese women are expected to be married by age 30, 35 at the latest, then stay at home. Young ladies have been fighting this cultural ideal for a few decades now.

30? 35? That's on the verge of becoming old maids. Darn well better get married by then!

11 posted on 06/07/2005 1:18:48 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Defeat Pat DeWine, RINO Mike DeWine's son! Tom Brinkman for Congress http://www.gobrinkman.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moral Hazard

The total fertility rate is the average number of children born to a woman over her entire lifetime, not each year. 2.1 is considered to be the replacement rate where population will be stable. Below this population falls without immigration to make up for the shortfall. Japan has little immigration.


12 posted on 06/07/2005 1:20:17 PM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
30? 35? That's on the verge of becoming old maids. Darn well better get married by then!

The best time for women to get married is usually before they turn 25. After that, the chances of them getting married as well as being pregnant decreases significantly.

13 posted on 06/07/2005 1:20:47 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: green iguana

"The total fertility rate is the average number of children born to a woman over her entire lifetime, not each year. 2.1 is considered to be the replacement rate where population will be stable. Below this population falls without immigration to make up for the shortfall. Japan has little immigration."

Yes, I know, but the way the article was written it sounded like it was annual, so I was imagining what things would be like if actually were annual.


14 posted on 06/07/2005 1:26:33 PM PDT by Moral Hazard (Unfortunately the Golden Rule doesn't apply to sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Could this explain the problem?

15 posted on 06/07/2005 1:27:27 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I'm helping a lot with this problem, these days...


16 posted on 06/07/2005 1:30:31 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican; snarks_when_bored
On the other hand (so to speak)...

17 posted on 06/07/2005 1:30:33 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

bttt


18 posted on 06/07/2005 1:31:35 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Native born american women have been below zero population growth since 1970. If Japan wants to overcrowd itself like the United States wants, then all it has to do is to copy our immigration policies. Maybe Japan doesnt want to overpopulate its country? Maybe it wants to keep its culture?

Personally, I wouldnt mind it if we had stayed at 200 million, no traffic, no bilingual, lots of farms, fields and woods to hunt in, etc. But I am in the minority, and most americans want congestion and huge never ending increases in population.

19 posted on 06/07/2005 1:40:25 PM PDT by SandyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyB
One word- Godzilla. That is the cause, well other than President Bush. Blame must be assigned and Godzilla or Bush are the reason.
20 posted on 06/07/2005 1:42:41 PM PDT by possumdawg (There are three types of people- those that can count and those who cannot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson