Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right fights back
Hollywood Reporter ^ | 06/07/05 | Paul Bond

Posted on 06/07/2005 1:45:04 PM PDT by Pikamax

Right fights back Conservative filmmakers struggle to make their voices heard amid what they call a hostile Hollywood environment.

By Paul Bond Between the lines

Forget about whether Fox's "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith" contains vague attacks on the Bush administration -- there are plenty of less-nuanced examples of antagonism toward Republicans in mainstream movies. So says a new breed of politically conservative filmmakers who, tired of waiting for Hollywood executives to give 'em a break, are creating companies to make and distribute their Republican-friendly works. And lest there be doubt about their political agenda, they have given the companies such names as American Pride Films Group and RightSide Video.

Some outnumbered Republican entertainment workers not only yearn for equal access to filmmaking in famously left-leaning Hollywood but also consider themselves at war against a hostile left-wing majority, with battles being waged on the Internet, in books, at film festivals and even in nightclubs (hence a comedy troupe named the Right Stuff). They're even -- gasp! -- organizing in groups like the Hollywood Congress of Republicans, which sponsors luncheons at which celebrities including Ben Stein and Morgan Brittany offer moral support to a like-minded political minority that is sick of being mocked by industry taste-setters.

"Some liberals in the entertainment industry are such schoolyard bullies that even my liberal friends are horrified at their behavior," says Cheryl Rhoads, best known for playing the title role in the 1987 video compilation "The Mother Goose Treasury."

Rhoads is authoring a book about being a conservative in Hollywood, in which she tells stories like one about the time when, on the set of a network TV show, an executive shouted, "Anyone who votes Republican is so fired!"

"If she had said it about homosexuals, there would have been lawsuits," Rhoads says.

Complains Namrata Singh Gujral, who co-founded APFG with Lt. Cmdr. Joe Cooper, a military screenwriting consultant and Naval Reserve pilot who recently was deployed to the Middle East, "I read about President Bush asking Hollywood to help with America's image after the (Sept. 11) terrorist attacks, but I didn't see a flurry of films."

APFG's first project is the $5 million production "Americanizing Shelley," a script Gujral and Cooper shopped around Hollywood before opting to make themselves. Gujral says one executive blanched at the movie's ending because the main character abandons her dislike of the United States, while another dismissed the film with the proclamation, "I'm ashamed to be an American."

APFG is next readying a $25 million movie about the recent conflict in Iraq and a $25 million science fiction film, both of which will portray the U.S. in a favorable light.

"We're nonpartisan, but we're lumped into the Republican Party for being pro-American," Gujral says. "That's unfortunate."

David Goodman created RightSide Video, a unit of his DVD Acquisition and Development Group, last year at about the same time "Fahrenheit 9/11" surpassed $100 million at the U.S. boxoffice and Michael Moore was the darling of the Democratic Party. While attending the American Film Renaissance -- the nation's first conservative film festival -- in Dallas in September, Goodman heard a speech in which film critic and talk-radio host Michael Medved praised the audience of right-leaning filmmakers.

"Several people, holding up finished DVDs in their hands, thanked Medved for his encouragement then complained that they couldn't find distribution," Goodman says. "I stood up and said, 'Here I am.'"

Goodman struck deals at the AFR to distribute the DVDs "The Seeds of Western Civilization," "Mega Fix" and "Is It True What They Say About Ann?" The latter, a documentary helmed by Elinor Burkett and Patrick Wright about best-selling conservative author Ann Coulter, quickly sold more than 10,000 copies at $20 apiece and is on shelves at Barnes & Noble and Borders, among other retailers (though all RightSide titles sell best on the Internet).

While acknowledging that moving a few-thousand copies of a right-leaning DVD in a few months' time will not impress a Hollywood mogul, Goodman notes that sales of his merchandise are consistent.

"I don't have catalog titles and new releases -- just catalog -- and I market it every day," he says.

Goodman was one of 4,000 AFR attendees last year, according to AFR co-founder Jim Hubbard. Several of the two-dozen movies screened there subsequently unspooled at the Liberty Film Festival -- an unrelated event that bills itself as Hollywood's first conservative film festival -- and Hubbard says his event already has spawned a sister festival in Little Rock, Ark., with others on the drawing board in Kansas City, Mo., and Washington.

Winning awards from the Renaissance and Liberty festivals last year was Stephen K. Bannon's documentary "In the Face of Evil: Reagan's War in Word and Deed" from Leo McWatkins Films, a company co-founded by Tim Watkins, whose Renegade Prods. makes about 30 commercials a year for clients including Time Warner and Comcast. Watkins believes that Mel Gibson proved with 2004's "The Passion of the Christ" that Christian conservatives will flock to theaters for movies that interest them, "but there's not enough inventory to keep them coming back."

"Face of Evil" was made for $1 million and includes 1914 footage of Austro-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and 1919 footage of Soviet Premier Vladimir Lenin. Watkins boasts that the film earned an average of $9,000 a screen during its opening weekend in six Dallas theaters, compared with the $900 opening-weekend per-screen tally for "Going Upriver: The Long War of John Kerry," a favorable evaluation of the 2004 Democratic presidential candidate's war service that was released at about the same time.

Watkins is building a 25,000-square-foot studio in Baltimore that will focus on making Christian- and family-themed movies and TV shows, and he has produced a reality TV pilot titled "Grace Before Meals," featuring a personable chef who helps families learn to cook and happens to be a Catholic priest. Watkins' next film, "Atomic Iran," is based on a novel by Jerome Corsi, co-author of "Unfit for Command" -- a book that, according to many Democratic pundits, cost Kerry the election.

Then there's Evan Coyne Maloney, who gained attention in 2003 by pointing a camera at protesters before the U.S. attacked Iraq and asking them to explain their concerns. The humorous result is one of a series of short films he has posted on the Internet.

Maloney and a couple of partners then founded On the Fence Films, which has begun to earn acclaim for "Brainwashing 101," a documentary that spotlights political correctness on college campuses and plays primarily -- where else? -- on college campuses.

"People making documentaries today are primarily on the left, so stories that don't interest them would go untold," Maloney says.

Several clubs catering to entertainment-industry Republicans also are springing up, allowing conservatives to congregate. Members say such forums are necessary because they are outnumbered by outwardly hostile liberals, and some will not even reveal their political leanings for fear of reprisal.

"I do the dance, trying to figure out who the fellow conservatives are when we're all afraid to speak up," says Steve Finefrock, who executive-produced short films for the Department of Homeland Security before moving to Hollywood and working as a production assistant.

Finefrock and his ilk get no sympathy from prolific writer-producer Larry Gelbart, whose credits include the classic TV sitcom "M*A*S*H," the 1977 feature "Oh, God!" and the 1982 feature "Tootsie."

"Bullshit!" Gelbart replies, when asked if liberals make things difficult for conservatives in Hollywood. "If you're not strong enough to support a Republican administration out loud, then you're a wimp."

Gelbart, conservative writer Lionel Chetwynd and others are set to hash out their differences June 21 at Level One restaurant in Los Angeles during an event sponsored by Finefrock's newly founded Hollywood Conservative Forum. Ask Finefrock for examples of Hollywood's liberal slant, and he rattles off films endlessly: An uptight preacher in 1984's "Footloose" has a conservative American town so juiced up that it outlaws dancing; the character representing the U.S. Marines in 1999's "American Beauty" is portrayed mostly as a homophobic lunatic; Communism is lionized in movies such as 1981's "Reds" and 2004's "The Motorcycle Diaries"; employees always come off as heroes (think 1979's "Norma Rae"), and the "system" is always evil (1987's "Wall Street"); and 1987's "Dirty Dancing" extols the virtues of abortion and 1990's "Pretty Woman" the normalcy of prostitution.

And don't get him started on Brian De Palma's classic 1976 horror film "Carrie."

"Carrie has been made a geek by her mother's overprotectiveness and wackiness, again derived from religion -- specifically Christianity," Finefrock says. "We're still waiting for the dysfunctional-family movie derived from bad Islam."

That's nonsense, according to Gelbart.

"When I watch movies I'm not looking for a political agenda, nor do I see one," he says.

Gelbart does acknowledge a pet peeve expressed by Finefrock and many other Hollywood conservatives: No executive today is willing to greenlight a movie that portrays extreme Islamists as the enemy (though check out Fox's 1994 actioner "True Lies" to see none other than current California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger going head-to-head with crazed jihadists). But Gelbart believes that is a pragmatic decision having little to do with politics.

"You make a radical Muslim mad, and he won't rip off your bumper sticker, he'll rip off your bumper -- then your car will be found in another state, and he'll put a fatwa on you," he says. "I think fearing for your life is a pretty good reason not to do it."

Gelbart traces the entertainment industry's liberal slant to something everyone in Hollywood can understand: economics. One can say what they will about the agenda behind "Carrie," "Footloose" or "Pretty Woman," but all of those movies scored at the boxoffice as few "conservative-oriented" films have.

Are those on the left inherently more skilled at producing mainstream entertainment? Do conservative filmmakers simply need more opportunities? Gelbart offers one possible answer.

"Nobody ever sat down and said, 'Let's make a bunch of lefty movies,'" he says. "List the artistic people on the left and those on the right, and compare their work: Those on the left are more creative."

Published June 07, 2005


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hollywood; hollywoodright; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Soon all actors will be replaced with computer graphics.

It won't be a problem then.


21 posted on 06/07/2005 2:11:39 PM PDT by hang 'em (Homos, muslims and RATs = coalition of the perverted, insane and retarded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

Gelbart doesn't see an agenda. He probably doesn't.

But, there is a liberal worldview conveyed in these pictures. All you have to do is watch a few movies, and it won't take you long to see who the good characters are, and who are the villains. Even in the comedies, the villains ultimately see the error of their ways, and they convert.

If you haven't seen Meet the Fockers, that's a perfect example. Look who the film shows as the characters we should be sympathetic to: a couple who arranged and approved of the maid boinking their adolescent son. They thought it would be a good first experience for him.

The good presidents are always liberal, but the corrupt ones are conservative.


22 posted on 06/07/2005 2:13:42 PM PDT by Madeleine Ward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Madeleine Ward
The good presidents are always liberal, but the corrupt ones are conservative.


My name is Bob Rumson...and I'm running for President!
23 posted on 06/07/2005 2:17:14 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Borges
The good presidents are always liberal, but the corrupt ones are conservative.

Hmmmmm... My take on the recent presidents, ignoring current administrations because I know the left will roll their eyes.. lets look at the past few Presidents.

Clinton (D)- Corrupt
Bush Sr(R)- Clean, semi effective
Reagan(R)- Clean as a whistle, effective
Carter(R)- Inept, possibly corrupt, especially after he left office)
Ford(R)- Clean, ineffective
Nixon(R)- Corrupt, jury will always be out on if he was effective.
LBJ (D)- Corrupt, ineffective
Kennedy(D)- I'll say clean as most corruption charges surround conspiracy theories, effective
Eisenhower (R)- Clean, effective
Truman (D)- Clean, semi-effective (effective wartime, ineffective post war)

I would like to know what D's the left thinks are 'good' presidents and what (besides the obvious Nixon) the left think is corrupt...
24 posted on 06/07/2005 2:31:24 PM PDT by mnehring (http://www.mlearningworld.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"Bullshit!" Gelbart replies, when asked if liberals make things difficult for conservatives in Hollywood. "If you're not strong enough to support a Republican administration out loud, then you're a wimp."

"You make a radical Muslim mad, and he won't rip off your bumper sticker, he'll rip off your bumper -- then your car will be found in another state, and he'll put a fatwa on you," he says. "I think fearing for your life is a pretty good reason not to do it."

Sooooo, he's a whimp?

25 posted on 06/07/2005 2:36:59 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"When I watch movies I'm not looking for a political agenda, nor do I see one," Gelbart says.

But then again, fish don't look for water, nor do they see it.

26 posted on 06/07/2005 2:38:38 PM PDT by Zhangliqun (What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"Bullshit!" Gelbart replies, when asked if liberals make things difficult for conservatives in Hollywood. "If you're not strong enough to support a Republican administration out loud, then you're a wimp."

snip

Gelbart does acknowledge a pet peeve expressed by Finefrock and many other Hollywood conservatives: No executive today is willing to greenlight a movie that portrays extreme Islamists as the enemy (though check out Fox's 1994 actioner "True Lies" to see none other than current California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger going head-to-head with crazed jihadists). But Gelbart believes that is a pragmatic decision having little to do with politics. "You make a radical Muslim mad, and he won't rip off your bumper sticker, he'll rip off your bumper -- then your car will be found in another state, and he'll put a fatwa on you," he says. "I think fearing for your life is a pretty good reason not to do it."

Gelbart the wimp.

27 posted on 06/07/2005 2:40:02 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Two great minds...we both caught it. :-)


28 posted on 06/07/2005 2:43:59 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CzarChasm
No executive today is willing to greenlight a movie that portrays extreme Islamists as the enemy . . .

Gelbart believes that is a pragmatic decision having little to do with politics. "You make a radical Muslim mad, and he won't rip off your bumper sticker, he'll rip off your bumper -- then your car will be found in another state, and he'll put a fatwa on you," he says. "I think fearing for your life is a pretty good reason not to do it."

. . . Gelbart replies, when asked if liberals make things difficult for conservatives in Hollywood. "If you're not strong enough to support a Republican administration out loud, then you're a wimp."

Our "intrepid" Mr. Gelbart courageously cries "BS!" when conservatives complain of pressure - but then announces that when it comes to opposing someone who is actually dangerous, he is a conscientious objector - a devout coward. In that context, Mr. Gelbart, any negative insinuation against any religion that doesn't intimidate you is a half-truth. And a very big lie.
"List the artistic people on the left and those on the right, and compare their work: Those on the left are more creative."
Well, Mr. Gelbart, at least we know they aren't courageous. Maybe they are just more commercial. All it takes to be commercial is superficiality, negativity, and arrogance. Newspapers prove that every day.

29 posted on 06/07/2005 2:47:22 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Is the study of politics an art? Or a science.

http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,947793,00.html


30 posted on 06/07/2005 2:49:43 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
an excellent point - no hesitation to denigrate the followers of truly peaceful religions; what courage!
31 posted on 06/07/2005 3:02:46 PM PDT by CzarChasm (My opinion. No charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
In claiming that liberals are more creative, Larry Gelbart states a fallacy rooted in arrogance and the fact that he lives in a liberal echo chamber. He and all his friends are liberals, and they know their work is better than anyone else's, so therefore, liberals must be more creative than anyone else. It's the same reason that liberals tend to believe liberal men are better in bed: they've repeated that canard for so many years in the liberal-owned media in hopes of convincing women of it. It's a phallic fallacy.

I happen to be a "creative" person (I've written advertising, TV, home video, two published books, and for the past 14 years, a daily radio comedy service). I know lots of other creative people who, like me, avoid Hollywood because they find the politics and lifestyle repulsive. We've just found other avenues for our creativity in more hospitable fields. It hardly means we are less creative than the cretins turning out the junk coming from Hollywood. If I thought my work weren't more creative than the cliche-ridden dreck in movie theaters (box office down for the 16th straight weekend and counting), the simplistic and ham-handed leftist twaddle I'm forced to sit through in live theaters as a local drama awards judge, or the garbage that pollutes most of our TV outlets ("Tonight on the Reality Channel: Paris Hilton eats a horse rectum!"), I'd just slit my wrists and get it over with.

BTW, if Gelbart calls Republicans wimps when they fear destroying their careers by supporting Bush out loud, then why does he think it's perfectly excusable pragmatism for Hollywood studios to be afraid to criticize Muslims out loud? Bit of hypocrisy there, Lar?

32 posted on 06/07/2005 3:03:23 PM PDT by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Gelbart traces the entertainment industry's liberal slant to something everyone in Hollywood can understand: economics. One can say what they will about the agenda behind "Carrie," "Footloose" or "Pretty Woman," but all of those movies scored at the boxoffice as few "conservative-oriented" films have.

In 1960, it was estimated that upwards of 90% of Americans went to the movies on a regular basis. By 1990, I believe that it had fallen to somewhere between 20% and 30% (these figures are from my fallible memory, so I could be wrong, but I believe that I'm in the ballpark here).

While movie prices going up through the roof has something to do with this, it might also be pointed out the style of the movies prior to the 60's was more family-oriented than the style of movies today.
33 posted on 06/07/2005 3:06:20 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

""Bullshit!" Gelbart replies, when asked if liberals make things difficult for conservatives in Hollywood. "If you're not strong enough to support a Republican administration out loud, then you're a wimp.""

As opposed to those in Hollywood who supported Communism. If they did that out loud, they were "wimps" and "sellouts", and only by refusing to admit it would they be considered "heroes".

Qwinn


34 posted on 06/07/2005 3:16:48 PM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"... he obviously didn't watch Footloose to the end where the Preacher is shown as a genuinely good person..."

In this movie - just like countless other examples of this standard lib pap - the big, bad conservative is shown to become a good and decent person only when they become enlightened to progressive/permissive/hedonistic non-values. They must see the 'error of their ways'.

The continually repeated message is that problems are caused by moral values. Problems are only solved through (and happiness is only created through) casting the values aside, and 'lightening up'.

35 posted on 06/07/2005 3:44:19 PM PDT by WireAndWood (But first, the tranya. I hope that you relish it as much as I.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WireAndWood
If you equate having a High school dance as 'progressive/permissive/hedonistic non-values.' then you're correct. 'Footloose' was the Devil's work.
36 posted on 06/07/2005 3:46:23 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch
There is also much more competition for people's time and money these days then there was in the 40s when movie going was at an all time high.
37 posted on 06/07/2005 3:48:53 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HHFi
I know lots of other creative people who, like me, avoid Hollywood because they find the politics and lifestyle repulsive.

This is exactly what I said earlier. Conservatives generally avoid the film making business to the detriment of the overall product. Contrary to what many people think, Hollywood isn't the only place in America that makes films. People like Kevin Smith and Richard Linklater have financed movies on their credit card.
38 posted on 06/07/2005 3:55:36 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Well maybe this is the way to make a difference. Who wants to suppost a bunch you KNOW is going to insult you. This group sounds like the answer. One giant success and all is well. Money will follow money. The start-up money is the problem. But that can be rectified by presenting a marketable project.


39 posted on 06/07/2005 3:56:02 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
forget it, i've had it with Hollywood.

I say tax all profit above $1,000,000 on a movie at a 90% since the pinkos think the rich should be paying more anyway.
40 posted on 06/07/2005 3:56:51 PM PDT by Nyboe (From God we receive both our freedom and morality. A Godless society will have neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson