They went to court as called but would not reveal sources, so the "privilege." The prosecutor is trying to get them to talk on these matters.
The prosecutor is trying to get them to talk on these matters.
-----
Understood. I think the scenario is best defined as to whether these people have CRITICAL EVIDENCE. It is a violation of law to WITHHOLD EVIDENCE in various felony situations. That would then be an issue of interpreting the law, not making law. Legislating from the bench is very easy to spot when it happens. Like it was in Florida when the activist pro-Gore judges tried to RE-WRITE Florida election law. It of course, went to the SC, and was approriately slapped down. It still angers me to this day that the deliberately guilty judges were not throw out of the legal system. It will be interesting to see how this situation goes.