Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gitmo In, Gitmo Out?
Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 17 June 2005 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)

Posted on 06/13/2005 7:24:30 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob

I first wrote about the Gitmo prison, four years ago. I laid out facts the MSM have yet to discover. Here’s another dose:

1. If Gitmo is closed, the prisoners, AND the complaints, will go elsewhere. (Is Senator Mel Martinez really that clueless?)

2. The Geneva Conventions do NOT apply to anyone captured in plain clothes, behind the lines, hiding among civilians (and also killing civilians). Anyone can read the Geneva Conventions for themselves. Fighters/soldiers must meet four conditions to be covered. Terrorists fail to meet at least three of those.

These are not “insurgents.” Insurgents are people who disagree with their group. Senators Olympia Snowe and Lincoln Chafee are insurgents. If you don’t want to say “terrorists,” use “assassins.” Google the word assassin and note its origins in Indian history. “Religious fanatics who murder civilians.” Sounds like a fit, to me.

What treatment do assassins/terrorists warrant, bare minimum? A drumhead trial, and prompt execution. Google Nathan Hale, or Major John Andre, to see why they got such trials and executions during the America Revolution.

3. Even if the prisoners at Gitmo WERE subject to the Geneva Convention, how long could they be held, and under what conditions?

Does the phrase “for the duration” mean anything to the press? Or to any Members of Congress, currently mouthing off on this subject? In every war ever fought – once most nations outgrew the idea of slaughtering all prisoners – the captured fighters were held until the war ended (unless ransomed out, like Chaucer, among others).

During World War II we had camps for prisoners many places, as needed. There was even a German POW camp in Arkansas. Don’t believe me? Google it. And NONE of those prisoners were entitled to lawyers, trials, etc.

The Americans who hit the beach at Iwo Jima, or Normandy, or anywhere else, did not go in with arrest warrants, and printed cards to read captured Japanese or Germans their Miranda rights. They went in with rifles and hand grenades. Their task was to kill as many of the enemy as possible, while preserving their own lives.

I repeat the words of General George Patton, that entirely too few Americans apparently have heard, or understood. “You do not win a war by dying for your country. You win by making some other b*stard die for his country.” While we are quoting famous generals for statements that any fool, even a reporter or a Congressman, should know, add this from William Tecumseh Sherman, “War is hell.”

4. What about the “lack of an exit plan?” Anyone who even asks this question is demonstrating a thundering ignorance of history. As World War II makes very clear, our exit strategy then was: Win the war. Take over the country. Destroy the war culture. Turn the nation into a stable, democratic one with a free market economy. That new nation, unlike the defeated one, will then become an ally of the US.

We never announced, in advance, when we would withdraw troops from Germany, nor how many troops we would take out. If we had done that, the Werewolves who were set up by the Nazis to continue fighting after the surrender, would have run to ground. They would have come out to fight after the date we had announced it would become easier.

Let me shorten that, so even the dumbest Congressman or the most biased reporter for the New York Times can understand it. A competent exit plan means: Win. Straighten things out. Come home.

Anyone who thinks he/she can predict exactly when the US military will be able to win and then come home, should practice by predicting next month’s stock prices. That way, if they are wrong, they will not be betting with the lives of Americans.

5. What is the cost of this war in our blood?

I’ve written about this before, so I’ll be brief here. Of the eleven major wars the US has fought including our Revolution, this is the LEAST bloody war measured by deaths per month. Don’t believe me? Google the statistics. Look it up. Then quit writing and/or believing cr*p about how costly this war is.

While you are at it, look up the statistics on how many young American men die, per thousand, in auto accidents, shootings, and other causes here in the US, as opposed to in Iraq. Use deaths per thousand. Try comparing Baghdad to Detroit, to use an example not entirely at random.

To press and politicians, I say: Research the facts. Tell the truth. Quit being dumb as a brick. Is that so d*mned difficult?

About the Author: John Armor is a First Amendment attorney and author who lives in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. John_Armor@aya.yale.edu


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: assassins; exitplan; generalpatton; generalsherman; genevaconventions; germany; gitmo; guantanamo; insurgents; iwojima; japan; majorjohnandre; melmartinez; mirandarights; nathanhale; normandy; terrorists; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: angrylibertarian

Actually it has nothing to do with religion, muslim or otherwise. These are multiple groups of ignorant fanatics (not necessarily uneducated) who are being manipulated by some power crazy mulahs into believing that their lot in life has been caused by the 'unbelieving heathens'. Like some of our youthful (and not so youthful) college folks, they are easily manipulated into believing that America is the problem. If we don't get a hold of our education system - we 'gonna lose this country'!


41 posted on 06/13/2005 9:21:58 AM PDT by Eighth Square
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

I have a better suggestion. Each detainee should be put under house arrest under the daily care of an ACLU lawyer.
Hide the cutlery!


42 posted on 06/13/2005 9:21:58 AM PDT by WoodstockCat (W2 !!! Four more Years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: angrylibertarian
The very words you quote show that the terrorists are NOT protected by the Geneva Conventions. They are "illegal combatants."

You should be familiar with In Re Quirin, the unanimous Supreme Court decision in 1942 which approved the trial, and execution if so ruled, of "illegal combatants" including two who claimed to be American citizens. And the "trials" you refer to for Hale and Andre were, exactly as I said in my column, "drumhead trials."

These are "military tribunals" on the battlefield. They have nothing to do with ordinary US civil or criminal courts.

You are reading the right sources. You are just not comprehending what you are reading.

John / Billybob

43 posted on 06/13/2005 9:22:58 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (For copies of my speech, "Dealing with Outlaw Judges," please Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: angrylibertarian
So either they have protections as POWs, or they have protections as detained civilians.

No, there is yet another class mentioned in the Conventions, that of saboteur or illegal combatant. Under the Conventions, this group has less protections than the other two and the Conventions make it quite clear that they can be held incommunicado for the duration so long as the holding country deems them a threat.

44 posted on 06/13/2005 9:32:10 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bozot

The Muslims!!!!!!!! They are the worst.


45 posted on 06/13/2005 9:36:44 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: angrylibertarian

Well my friend, if the Muslim's are not controlled then you won't have to wonder just what they would do to us!!!!!!!!!!


46 posted on 06/13/2005 9:38:58 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Eighth Square
I have to respectfully disagree with you about not having anything to do with religion. These terrorist are all about religion. They will not stop until they have converted the World.
47 posted on 06/13/2005 9:44:00 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Great article. I am passing it along with the length to your post.

Thanks for posting it.


48 posted on 06/13/2005 9:50:25 AM PDT by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

once Bush showed weakness by saying "all options are being looked at", the weak hands started to fold. Cheney seems to have taken a tough stance, but its up to Bush to refute these lies from the left about Gitmo.


49 posted on 06/13/2005 9:52:57 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

length = link

(How did I miss that?)


50 posted on 06/13/2005 9:59:05 AM PDT by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Fantastic eassy! Shoud be published as an truthful alternative to the biased junk that appears in the MSM.

As I write this, I'm listening to Rush (who is roughly my age), who just called (accurately) our generation the "worst generation." Sadly, Rush is right. The Gitmo "template" is yet another example of the preferences od the "worst generation." Listening to their "pattle" (thanks, Congressman Billybob) makes me sick. There they go again...
51 posted on 06/13/2005 10:22:29 AM PDT by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDB

VP Cheney was just shown LIVE on FNC addressing the NPC and imo, made it clear as only our guy Cheney can, that Gitmo is not going anywhere.


52 posted on 06/13/2005 10:35:01 AM PDT by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

53 posted on 06/13/2005 10:51:28 AM PDT by al baby (Father of the Beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Well you have a point, but ignorance and poverty (heavy on the ignorance) are the reasons these killers are persuaded to hate to the point where they will kill themselves for the cause. Our problem is that too many of our own people just don't understand that warfare is inherent in mankind and they had just better get used to it. There is no dialog here, nothing to talk about, they are fanatics and the world is going to have to hunt 'em down and kill 'em before they kill the world by initiating some kind of WMD exchange. Sorry for the rampage and to get back to your point, there are plenty of good Muslims as well as a bunch of hypocrits, Just like Christians - don't forget that these extream believers are living in the middle ages and like our 'lefty' freaks they really believe it.


54 posted on 06/13/2005 1:21:38 PM PDT by Eighth Square
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Eighth Square

The Muslim terrorist that hit on 9/11 were not poverty stricken and highly educated. Muslim's agenda is to convert the whole world to Islam, and if you don't you will be killed. I will admit that my family has an ax to grind with these extremist, but if we do not get the situation under control WW 3 is going to happen.


55 posted on 06/13/2005 2:43:48 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

> Is that so d*mned difficult?

For them, Sir, I'd say it's impossible; their heads would explode.



Now, if we close Gitmo, we're gonna hafta put the inmates somehwere else. But where? Is Amnesty Int'l suggesting The Hokey Pokey?

Ya put your Gitmo in,
Ya put your Gitmo out,
Ya put your Gitmo in and ya shake it all about,
Ya do the Hokey Pokey and ya turn yourself around,
That's what it's all a-bout

All of life's a flippin' fairy tale for these numbskulls.


56 posted on 06/13/2005 4:51:47 PM PDT by HKMk23 (The requirements of stewardship are NOT a mandate for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: daybreakcoming
Thanks. VP Cheney is so effective. Watchinjg him right now in C-SPAN--a re-run of his talk at the National Press Club re the "Gerald R. Ford Journalism Awards."
58 posted on 06/13/2005 8:35:21 PM PDT by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CDB

Must be the same thing you refer to.


59 posted on 06/13/2005 8:36:47 PM PDT by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Nice wordsmithing John.


60 posted on 06/14/2005 2:48:22 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson