If Pax-6 is a gate enabling gates downstream to develop the eye how did the eye evolve, and evolve so quickly, absent the gate keeper?
Indeed. Another would be whether/how it was engineered into the original "genetic program" so that it could not be otherwise? (
Weiss: How the eye got its brain) Further still, how would such semiosis arise by purely natural, undirected, processes?
"Further still, how would such semiosis arise by purely natural, undirected, processes?" Argumentum ad ignorantium.
You have been corrected a number of times about the directedness of natural selection. Why do you still insist on making the assertion that because, in your mind, natural selection is undirected it could not be responsible for changes in allele frequency within a population?