Skip to comments.
Possible Earth-like planet discovered
Houston Comical (AP) ^
| June 13, 2005, 2:14PM
Posted on 06/13/2005 12:42:00 PM PDT by The_Victor
WASHINGTON A planet that may be Earth-like but too hot for life as we know it has been discovered orbiting a nearby star.
The discovery of the planet, with an estimated radius about twice that of Earth, was announced today at the National Science Foundation.
"This is the smallest extrasolar planet yet detected and the first of a new class of rocky terrestrial planets," Paul Butler of the Carnegie Institution in Washington said in a statement. "It's like Earth's bigger cousin."
Geoffrey Marcy, professor of astronomy at the University of California, Berkeley, added: "Over 2,000 years ago, the Greek philosophers Aristotle and Epicurus argued about whether there were other Earth-like planets. Now, for the first time, we have evidence for a rocky planet around a normal star."
Though the researchers have no direct proof that the new planet is rocky, its mass means it is not a giant gas planet like Jupiter, they said. They estimated the planet's mass as 5.9 to 7.5 times that of Earth.
It is orbiting a star called Gliese 876, 15 light years from Earth, with an orbit time of just 1.94 Earth days. They estimated the surface temperature on the new planet at between 400 degrees and 750 degrees Fahrenheit.
Gliese 876 is a small, red star with about one-third the mass of the sun. The researchers said this is the smallest star around which planets have been discovered. In addition to the newly found planet the star has two large gas planets around it.
Butler said the researchers think that the most probable composition of the planet is similar to inner planets of this solar system a nickel/iron rock.
Gregory Laughlin of the Lick Observatory at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said a planet of this mass could have enough gravity to hold onto an atmosphere. "It would still be considered a rocky planet, probably with an iron core and a silicon mantle. It could even have a dense steamy water layer."
Three other extrasolar planets believed to be of rocky composition have been reported, but they orbit a pulsar the flashing corpse of an exploded star rather than a normal type of star.
On the Net:
National Science Foundation: http://www.nsf.gov
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: space; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-124 next last
To: The_Victor
2
posted on
06/13/2005 12:42:49 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: The_Victor
I would've said "Mercury-like." Besides, this thing is hugh (I'm series).
3
posted on
06/13/2005 12:43:06 PM PDT
by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: The_Victor
They estimated the surface temperature on the new planet at between 400 degrees and 750 degrees Fahrenheit. That's earth like?
5
posted on
06/13/2005 12:44:41 PM PDT
by
beltfed308
(Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunion.)
To: The_Victor
They've already found sentinent life:
6
posted on
06/13/2005 12:44:47 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
To: The_Victor
Just whipping around it's sun isn't it.
7
posted on
06/13/2005 12:47:51 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: The_Victor
It is orbiting a star called Gliese 876, 15 light years from Earth, with an orbit time of just 1.94 Earth days.Wow!! This planet's really moving.
Imagine the mortgage rates on this real estate.
8
posted on
06/13/2005 12:48:39 PM PDT
by
shekkian
To: The_Victor
sounds like a good place for Dean's voter-outreach program
9
posted on
06/13/2005 12:48:49 PM PDT
by
NewMediaFan
(Fake but accurate)
To: The_Victor
If we only had a Stargate!
10
posted on
06/13/2005 12:50:31 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: The_Victor
"A planet that may be Earth-like but too hot for life as we know it has been discovered orbiting a nearby star. The discovery of the planet, with an estimated radius about twice that of Earth, was announced today at the National Science Foundation."
" . . . too hot for life as we know it . . . with an estimated radius about twice that of earth . . . "
Doesn't sound very "Earth-like" to me.
To: shekkian
Wow!! This planet's really moving. Imagine the mortgage rates on this real estate.
But you could live to be 14000 years old.
12
posted on
06/13/2005 12:51:10 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: shekkian
Shekkian, did it say the distance from the it's sun? That orbit is haulin a$$ either way.
13
posted on
06/13/2005 12:51:20 PM PDT
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If Islam is a religion of peace, they should fire their P.R. guy!)
To: Junior
Exactly...how is this Earth like? Granted it is more Earth like than a gas giant, but still.
To: The_Victor
A planet that may be Earth-like but too hot for life as we know it
I claim this planet for Texas. We will hang out there during the summer.
To: beltfed308
They estimated the surface temperature on the new planet at between 400 degrees and 750 degrees Fahrenheit.
Bush caused global warming there too?
16
posted on
06/13/2005 12:56:38 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://www.mlearningworld.com)
To: The_Victor
I just can't believe that orbital period. It would have to be so close to the star that friction would quckly bring it down.
1.94 YEARS, maybe?
17
posted on
06/13/2005 12:58:16 PM PDT
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: mnehrling
The left did say that environmental policies of this administration would have FAR reaching consequences.
To: Da Bilge Troll
Actually, 1.94 days is possible. The star is dim so while it's hot as the article said, it's nowhere near as hot as if the planet were the same distance from our sun.
19
posted on
06/13/2005 1:02:25 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
To: The_Victor
with an orbit time of just 1.94 Earth days. That sucker is movin'!
20
posted on
06/13/2005 1:04:53 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: beltfed308
That's earth like? Relatively speaking, I guess.
21
posted on
06/13/2005 1:10:23 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
To: Da Bilge Troll
I just can't believe that orbital period. It would have to be so close to the star that friction would quckly bring it down. This is a significant factor in the orbital period:
Gliese 876 is a small, red star with about one-third the mass of the sun.
22
posted on
06/13/2005 1:11:04 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: The_Victor
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Mars) will be green with envy (greener).
To: lilylangtree
"They estimated the surface temperature on the new planet at between 400 degrees and 750 degrees Fahrenheit"
24
posted on
06/13/2005 1:14:57 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: The_Victor
Yeah, but the question is who will the enviro-whacko's blame this case of Global Warming on?
25
posted on
06/13/2005 1:19:43 PM PDT
by
Tallguy
To: The_Victor
The planet is inhabited by nerdlings.
26
posted on
06/13/2005 1:19:51 PM PDT
by
GulliverSwift
(Just say no to McCain and Giulliani)
To: All
I'm curious if the gravity of a planet is affected by it's density. I know our gas giants aren't very dense yet they have extremely strong gravitational fields. Or is mass more of a factor than density?
27
posted on
06/13/2005 1:20:14 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: Rummyfan
Hope not, that whole death penalty thing and all. We could be executed for just responding to this thread!
28
posted on
06/13/2005 1:22:48 PM PDT
by
waverna
To: Rummyfan
Is it Talos IV????? No, probably Gliese 876 I, unless there's another planet closer in to it's sun.
Posting from Sol III.
29
posted on
06/13/2005 1:23:15 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: Rummyfan
30
posted on
06/13/2005 1:23:37 PM PDT
by
waverna
To: cripplecreek
Gravitational pull is purely a function of mass and distance.
31
posted on
06/13/2005 1:24:14 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: The_Victor
It's a terrestrial planet, but it sure ain't earthlike.
32
posted on
06/13/2005 1:26:07 PM PDT
by
Brett66
(Howard Dean - the gift that keeps on giving)
To: cripplecreek
I'm curious if the gravity of a planet is affected by it's density. Gravity's affected by the planet's mass. Density is the mass per unit of volume, so they are related. Remember, Saturn has a density of less than 1 (the density of water) while Earth's density is 5 and some change. However, Saturn has a higher "surface" gravity than Earth because it is so much bigger.
33
posted on
06/13/2005 1:27:56 PM PDT
by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: The_Victor
So a rocky planet the size of Jupiter would have the same gravitational pull as a gas giant like Jupiter?
34
posted on
06/13/2005 1:28:06 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: cripplecreek
No. A rocky world that size (an impossibility) would be more massive than a gas giant and have a higher surface gravity.
35
posted on
06/13/2005 1:29:12 PM PDT
by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: BenLurkin
From the only good line in Riddick...."If I owned this place and Hell...I'd live in hell, and rent this place out."
To: cripplecreek
So a rocky planet the size of Jupiter would have the same gravitational pull as a gas giant like Jupiter? No. A rocky planet would have much greater mass that a gas planet of the same size.
37
posted on
06/13/2005 1:32:55 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: cripplecreek
I'm curious if the gravity of a planet is affected by it's density. I know our gas giants aren't very dense yet they have extremely strong gravitational fields. Or is mass more of a factor than density? The gravity field is dependent only on the mass. However the surface gravity is dependent on both the mass and the radius of the planet. The less dense planet will have a larger radius, by the cube root of the density ratio. It's surface gravity will be lower by the square of the cube root of the density ratio.
38
posted on
06/13/2005 1:36:34 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: Steve_Seattle
Doesn't sound very "Earth-like" to me.By their standards it's almost a carbon copy. If it's solid, has an atmosphere and isn't hot enough to melt most metals it's pretty close. I blame bad reporting for the impressing they convey, because to a layman "earth like" means survivable without a spacesuit and the closest thing we have to that is Mars.
39
posted on
06/13/2005 1:38:42 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Proudly Christian since 2005)
To: cripplecreek
Gravity is directly proportional to mass. Density has nothing to do with the equation. Gas giants have high gravity because even though they aren't dense, there's a lot of mass involved.
40
posted on
06/13/2005 1:39:15 PM PDT
by
brownsfan
(Post No Bills)
To: K4Harty
Pretty damn close I'd say. It must be a very small star because any planet orbiting the sun that quick would melt in a matter of minutes.
41
posted on
06/13/2005 1:40:33 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Proudly Christian since 2005)
To: The_Victor
A planet that may be Earth-like but too hot for life as we know it has been discovered orbiting a nearby star. Further investigations demonstrate that the planet is a remarkable parallel to earth. It also developed a human-like life form and developed politics similar to the United States. Unfortunately, on that planet, socialists gained the upper hand and drove all business into the ground. The people of the planet had to continue burning trees and cow dung, which lead to the state we find the planet in today.
Shalom.
42
posted on
06/13/2005 1:40:55 PM PDT
by
ArGee
(Why do we let the abnormal tell us what's normal?)
To: BenLurkin
between 400 degrees and 750 degrees Fahrenheit Rampant book-burning and corresponding anti-environmental policies likely led to the conditions there...
43
posted on
06/13/2005 1:43:38 PM PDT
by
mikrofon
(Bushdidit)
To: cripplecreek
I'm curious if the gravity of a planet is affected by it's densityThe short answer is yes. Gravity is a function of the mass of the body and the distance from the centre of mass. Therefore the surface of a less dense planet would be further from the centre of mass and gravity at the surface would therefore be lower.
44
posted on
06/13/2005 1:43:49 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Proudly Christian since 2005)
To: Squawk 8888
Sounds right. I'd like to know more about it.
45
posted on
06/13/2005 1:47:41 PM PDT
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If Islam is a religion of peace, they should fire their P.R. guy!)
To: cripplecreek
Actually, I don't have the math handy but I believe that a body with the density of rock and the volume of Jupiter would probably be a star, ignited by the pressure of all that mass. That's why rocky planets are small and the only large planets are the gas giants.
46
posted on
06/13/2005 1:47:56 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Proudly Christian since 2005)
To: beltfed308; The_Victor
They estimated the surface temperature on the new planet at between 400 degrees and 750 degrees Fahrenheit. *************************************************************
That's earth like?
Perhaps they should have said: 'Venus like' - but that wouldn't have made an eye catching headline.
47
posted on
06/13/2005 1:49:31 PM PDT
by
Irish_Thatcherite
(Orwellian Relativism: All philosophies are equal, but some philosophies are more equal than others.)
To: RockinRight
Moore's a sentinent lifeform?
48
posted on
06/13/2005 1:50:44 PM PDT
by
Irish_Thatcherite
(Orwellian Relativism: All philosophies are equal, but some philosophies are more equal than others.)
To: Squawk 8888
Ive been digesting this. It's all interesting to me.
49
posted on
06/13/2005 1:51:36 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: Irish_Thatcherite
Actually, no, just a blob of tissue...like a jellyfish.
50
posted on
06/13/2005 1:51:53 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson