Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran has failed to provide crucial nuclear information - ElBaradei
Middle East Times ^ | June 14, 2005 | Michael Adler

Posted on 06/14/2005 11:51:03 PM PDT by nickcarraway

VIENNA -- The UN atomic agency's investigation of Iran will continue as Iran has failed to provide "sufficient" information on crucial questions about uranium-enriching centrifuges and nuclear smuggling, the agency's chief said on Tuesday.

Mohamed ElBaradei also said that Iran had not given access requested by the IAEA to the Lavizan and Parchin military sites, where diplomats say that weaponization work is suspected.

Diplomats said that the agency had also requested but had been denied access so far to interview key officials such as Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, a brigadier general who has worked at Lavizan.

Information is lacking over how close Iran is to being able to use sophisticated centrifuges for enriching uranium as well as its links to international nuclear smuggling, ElBaradei told a meeting of the 35-nation board of governors of his International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Speaking after being elected on Monday to a third four-year term as IAEA director general, ElBaradei, 62, said that the IAEA investigation of Iran would continue, even if progress was being made on some fronts.

"Iran has provided some additional documentation and information, which are not yet sufficient to answer several remaining questions," ElBaradei said.

His comments came as Iran was seeking to have a more than two-year investigation of its nuclear program closed, especially since it is negotiating with the European Union to guarantee that it is not secretly developing atomic weapons and to win trade, security and technology benefits.

Iran says that its nuclear program is peaceful and designed to generate electricity but the United States says that this civilian effort hides a covert atomic weapons program.

ElBaradei, who was elected after the United States dropped its opposition to his candidacy, also formally declared on Tuesday his support of a US proposal "to establish a committee to consider ways and means to strengthen the safeguards system".

ElBaradei said that the IAEA had set up a similar committee in 1996 to fix weaknesses in monitoring Iraq's nuclear program.

Now "revelations such as the discovery of additional undeclared nuclear programs aided by covert nuclear supply networks and the risk associated with nuclear terrorism have confronted the agency's verification system and the nonproliferation regime in general with unprecedented challenges", he said.

ElBaradei's deputy director general for safeguards Pierre Goldschmidt is later in the week to provide a detailed briefing to the board on the current state of the Iran investigation.

ElBaradei said that the IAEA "is making progress on one of the two key remaining issues, namely the origin of the low and high enriched uranium contamination on equipment at various locations in Iran".

The agency is working to establish whether highly enriched uranium (HEU) that its inspectors have found in Iran is from imported equipment, as Tehran claims, or from Iranian manufacture of such potentially weapons-grade nuclear material.

A diplomat close to the IAEA said that the tests on centrifuge parts supplied by Pakistan tend so far to support Iran's claim that the contamination was from imported equipment.

But the diplomat said that the tests had not been concluded.

The other main remaining issue is the IAEA's investigation of Iran's acquisition of P-2 centrifuges, which are speedier than earlier models in enriching uranium that can be used to make fuel for civilian nuclear reactors but can also make up the explosive core of atom bombs.

The issue involves the nuclear technology and materials black market run by disgraced Pakistani scientist Abdel Qadeer Khan, and which supplied Iran, as well as Libya and North Korea.

ElBaredei said that the IAEA continued to press Tehran for "additional documentation regarding offers of equipment made to Iran, as well as for information on associated technical discussions between Iran and intermediaries in the procurement network", a reference to the international black market in smuggling nuclear materials and information.

ElBaradei said that the IAEA had asked Iran "to reach agreement on modalities, currently under discussion, that would provide the agency with access to dual-use equipment and other information related to the Lavizan-Shia site and would allow additional agency visits to areas of interest at the Parchin site".

Dual-use equipment can be used either for peaceful or military purposes.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atomicenergy; energy; fission; iaea; iran; islamofascism; neoeunazis; nuclear; unitednations

1 posted on 06/14/2005 11:51:04 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; Khashayar; Cyrus the Great; freedom44; sionnsar; PhiKapMom; Valin; Howlin; ...

Mullahs-with-nukes ping...


2 posted on 06/15/2005 12:02:23 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Apparently, Islam has no prohibition against bearing false witness too.


3 posted on 06/15/2005 12:04:17 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

It doesn't matter. The Iranians could build 50 nukes and showcase them in a huge parade in the middle of Tehran on CNN, and there would still be a large segment of the population who would see no reason to go after them.


4 posted on 06/15/2005 12:11:48 AM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

The war drums keep beating...Saudi Arabia rejects nuclear inspections yet the war drums keep beating for Iran and Syria. 95% of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi's. Syria pulls back, that's not good enough! The neoconmen keep beating the war drums! Bush's approval ratings are dropping. Wag the Mullah!


5 posted on 06/15/2005 12:57:38 AM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times; nickcarraway

6 posted on 06/15/2005 1:06:48 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Great! No problem! The UN is still on the case! < /sarcasm>


7 posted on 06/15/2005 2:28:19 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

BTT!!!!!!


8 posted on 06/15/2005 3:04:36 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

...and a flurry of reports that OBL is in Iran.


9 posted on 06/15/2005 4:06:50 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It all seems so strangely familiar of the same musing that were beingb printed about Iraq before we went there. If the world is frightened let them carry the load. We have done enough, and been abused for it. Russia has been supplying them with equipment France has been kissing their butt, Germany and Spain are cowering, and afraid to open their eyes. We dont need another Michael Jackson trial without a verdict here, What we need is incontrovertible proof. Then we destroy that stinking country and half the rest of the Mid-East with the blessing of the rest of the world and be done with it, once and for all. They want nukes let them use one, then we give them all the nukes they want, right down their throats.


10 posted on 06/15/2005 4:11:42 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
Mullahs-with-nukes ping...

I'm afraid to ask "Who else?!"


11 posted on 06/15/2005 4:45:42 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; ...
Why did El-Baradei get re-appoitented?
12 posted on 06/15/2005 4:53:08 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Good question. Why wasn't there a Buckets Sonovich around to oppose this duplicitous Arab?


13 posted on 06/15/2005 5:21:38 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (We will not deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents. ---GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The DAY AFTER Iran explodes a Nuke in a terrorist action, ElBaradei will state, "I was just about ready to release my report stating my conclusion that Iran may have nuclear weapons."


14 posted on 06/15/2005 5:21:53 AM PDT by G Larry (Promote Conservative Judges NOW! YOU BUNCH OF COWARDS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

creepy crawlys


15 posted on 06/15/2005 5:38:18 AM PDT by bitt ("There are troubling signs Bush doesn't care about winning a third term." (JH2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Thanks for the ping!


16 posted on 06/15/2005 6:32:30 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; Interesting Times

I can't believe they're going to put this clown (El Baradei) in for another term as head of the IAEA.


17 posted on 06/15/2005 6:36:10 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Great! No problem! The UN is still on the case! < /sarcasm>

It's there; so like most political givens in life, we work with it to reform it or neutralize it - as the case may be. End of discussion.

18 posted on 06/15/2005 6:54:57 AM PDT by mtntop3 ("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise

Did you say something? I just installed a new BS filter and I need to tweek it.


19 posted on 06/15/2005 7:05:30 AM PDT by Valin (The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Berosus; blam; dervish; Do not dub me shapka broham; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ...
Boom!
20 posted on 06/15/2005 7:39:48 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (FR profiled updated Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; DoctorMichael; Interesting Times; SunkenCiv

Does anyone else think that the Bolton delay re-elected el-Baradei? That sure happened under the radar.

If nothing else el-Baradei was responsible for the "leak" on missing Iraqi munitions that almost derailed Pres Bush's re-election one week before the vote. That guy is a snake.


21 posted on 06/15/2005 8:58:49 AM PDT by dervish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dervish

More to the point, el-Baradei shouldn't be anywhere near nukes. He covered up the Egyptian bomb research -- Egypt is an Arab country -- fought against the correct identification of Saddam's bomb project -- Iraq is an Arab country -- and says plenty about Iran's bomb project -- Iran is not an Arab country.


22 posted on 06/15/2005 9:04:22 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (FR profiled updated Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dervish
If nothing else el-Baradei was responsible for the "leak" on missing Iraqi munitions that almost derailed Pres Bush's re-election one week before the vote. That guy is a snake.

At BEST he's an incompetent who's renomination for this position should be blocked. (.....given what we've found out from Libya, and the other messes with Iran, North Korea, etc., etc., etc.......).

I was astounded when I heard this clown was be REnominated!

What are they thinking!

I agree though.......his announcement may have been a calculated ploy to obstruct US foreign policy; In which case, he is a danger to the World, and the American people in particular.

23 posted on 06/15/2005 9:32:59 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth-Estate is a Fifth-Column!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael; SunkenCiv

That's why we need Bolton ASAP.

He gets things done.


24 posted on 06/15/2005 9:38:08 AM PDT by dervish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Whay am I not surprised that the Moo-Lahs lie.


25 posted on 06/15/2005 11:09:21 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mtntop3

Yep. Hopefully we will get a rep who will stand up to the UN.


26 posted on 06/15/2005 12:14:08 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
Mullahs-with-nukes ping...

Thanks for the ping.

27 posted on 06/15/2005 2:16:11 PM PDT by zot (GWB -- four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Bolton is the man.


28 posted on 06/15/2005 2:48:18 PM PDT by mtntop3 ("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mtntop3

Yep!


29 posted on 06/15/2005 2:50:35 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Also, Bolton is a lightning rod for criticisms of the administration. Putting up a lot of targets gets the enemy to waste fire.


30 posted on 06/15/2005 5:11:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FR profiled updated Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

BUMP


31 posted on 06/15/2005 8:18:00 PM PDT by Khashayar (Screw You and Your Gas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valin
B.S. filter huh? I can understand why a freedom lover would want their reading material filtered. Makes perfect sense to me. How is your picture filter working?
32 posted on 06/21/2005 6:57:00 PM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson