Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The slow road to Windows XP
CNet ^ | 2005-0615 | Ina Fried

Posted on 06/15/2005 6:15:31 AM PDT by N3WBI3

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
Here is the official lifecycle of MS desktop Operating systems (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/default.mspx)

With onyl XP to replace it, Im not too happy that soon we may have to migrate off of our 2K desktops. Especially as XP is going EOL at the end of next year! So companies will enither need to run a mixed environment (2k/XP) until Longhorn is released, or do two desktop migrations in two years... ugg

Oh well at least they let IT folks use what ever they want, they cant take my Linux box away frmo me ;)

1 posted on 06/15/2005 6:15:31 AM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Windows 2000 & Office 2000 here. Zero reasons to upgrade either for me.


2 posted on 06/15/2005 6:18:24 AM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

The name of the game in software is to get you to upgrade. it's the only way to keep money coming in. It's not just Microsoft.


3 posted on 06/15/2005 6:20:35 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

MsOffice is a crappy Office Suite...jump to Corel for real power or to Open Office.

http://www.openoffice.org/product/


4 posted on 06/15/2005 6:20:38 AM PDT by Banjoguy (Don't be brain dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

Im sorry I like OO, and run neo-office on my Mac but calc is not substitute for Excel...


5 posted on 06/15/2005 6:23:26 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (posted on my brand new mac mini...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Windows 2000 Pro is probably Microsoft's best OS to date.


6 posted on 06/15/2005 6:23:46 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Agreed.  I have run Win 2000 on my home PC since 1999.

At one point I upgraded to .Net, went back to Win 2000

When Win 2003 came out, I tried that ... went back to Win 2000.

I am wondering why I would even need to upgrade to this 'Longhorn' when it comes out.

7 posted on 06/15/2005 6:24:07 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Win2K is the best Windows ever. Tons of hospitals and medical practices use it because of the better security, and have no wish to go to anything else. A friend of mine is a SysAdmin for a large medical practice and he says that there is no way MS can end support for it, no matter what they say. He said they expected to run 2000 for the next 5 years, and skip XP entirely.


8 posted on 06/15/2005 6:24:16 AM PDT by Space Wrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

Heck jump to a desktop Linux and reduce your M$ pain! No one really needs M$ software for anything.

Use Groupwise for e-mail and internal mail.


9 posted on 06/15/2005 6:24:28 AM PDT by thebaron512
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

My office here runs utterly pointless XP. The only things we use are Office apps and Adobe apps. 2K would be a much better choice, INHO, but the IT dept (in another state) runs scared of anything but MS and their latest offering.


10 posted on 06/15/2005 6:24:39 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

Tried Corel and it's okay, but MS Office is better.


11 posted on 06/15/2005 6:25:01 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
I think Microsoft would obviously prefer they were running Windows XP...

Of course they do. They have absolute control over your use of XP. They don't have that kind of control on any of the earlier versions. If they could shut down all previous versions they would do it in a minute. As it is they are trying every minute.

12 posted on 06/15/2005 6:25:53 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator
At one point I upgraded to .Net, went back to Win 2000

What does this statement mean?

13 posted on 06/15/2005 6:26:02 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thebaron512
Come on, to say no one needs M$ is not very accurate, is it?

With the 'dependancy' issues inherit in Linux, the average user will find it too frustrating to 'convert'.

Why do people act like you can just plug in Linux and everything works perfectly, when we all know that this is simply not the case?

14 posted on 06/15/2005 6:27:52 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

It means I HATED Windows .Net and went back to Win 2000.


15 posted on 06/15/2005 6:28:35 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
I find XP too unstable and only use it when I have to.  I still prefer Win 2000.  I've tried every flavor of MS software and several of the Linux varieties, too, and nothing is quite as easy and stable as W2K.
16 posted on 06/15/2005 6:32:28 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
but calc is not substitute for Excel...

What makes you say that? I know there are differences, but I haven't encountered any serious problems with oocalc in a long time.

I haven't ever really used Excel much, but I do exchange spreadsheets with Excel users.

17 posted on 06/15/2005 6:33:08 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

.Net is a development framework while 2000 is an OS. Do you mean XP?


18 posted on 06/15/2005 6:35:42 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kezekiel
As far as windows goes, 2000 is definitely the best release that I've had to suffer through using.
19 posted on 06/15/2005 6:37:28 AM PDT by zeugma (Democrats are Varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
Nail, Head, Bang... I was never really happy with XP which is worlds above any of the windows family other than 2K. But it was such a sad step backwards for MS.

On the server side, I think 2K has been well replaced by 2K3 the LDAP is smoother, and DNS a bit cleaner. With iis7 MS finally is taking a hint from Apache and making things a bit more modular..
20 posted on 06/15/2005 6:38:50 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (posted on my brand new mac mini...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson