Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Federalist
He is clearly on the downside of his career, he is no longer the best linebacker in the league, and isn't even the best defensive player on his team any more.

Bingo! The only reason a team should consent to renegotiating a player's salary is to lock-up a young, IMPROVING player -- not one who has already peaked. The one exception might be the quarterback position. Many QB's can be quite productive long after they lose that youthful zip on the ball.

32 posted on 06/15/2005 1:32:15 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy
The only reason a team should consent to renegotiating a player's salary is to lock-up a young, IMPROVING player -- not one who has already peaked.

Given how frequently players try to reneg on their contracts, I am surprised that teams haven't just started negotiating performance-based contracts in order to avoid this issue. I suppose the reason why is that the players don't want to be judged on performance, particularly when they know they can always whine and get out of their contracts if they want a better one.

34 posted on 06/15/2005 2:01:11 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson