Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anton

Well, either take my word for it or find someone you trust who's a pilot. They were not at any altitude that they didn't previously get permission to be at. But as they flew they'd get transferred from controller to controller as they enter airspace controlled by different controllers, and one of them commented on the rarity of seeing commercial traffic of that altitude. He'd already gotten a "strip" with all the flight's information, including their cleared altitude, on it. If the plane hadn't been at the altitude it had been previously assigned, the controller would have been much more concerned, as that would have been against regulations and potentially dangerous.


39 posted on 06/15/2005 5:32:17 PM PDT by Turbopilot (Viva la Reagan Revolucion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Turbopilot

You were right, they got permission for FL410, its on the transcript Compilation of CVR, FDR and ATC radio transmissions and other events, on the NTSB investigation site. http://ntsb.gov/events/2005/Pinnacle/exhibits/CVR_Study.pdf

It was still irresponsible to slow the aircraft to 150knots though.


62 posted on 06/15/2005 6:31:38 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Turbopilot

It's the pilot's responsibility to refuse altitudes that are dangerous -- but it sounds like these pilots requested the altitudes flown at.


72 posted on 06/15/2005 7:47:55 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson