Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: Democrats, Seeing Tit for Tat, Block a Nominee-What'd you expect from obstructionists?
New York Times ^ | June 16, 2005 | STEVEN R. WEISMAN

Posted on 06/16/2005 6:02:30 AM PDT by OESY

Opening a new battle with the White House, Senate Democrats on Wednesday abruptly blocked the approval of President Bush's nominee for a top public diplomacy job, charging that the administration had injected partisan politics into the drive to improve the United States' image overseas.

The nominee, Dina Powell, the White House personnel director, had been expected to win broad approval to become deputy under secretary of state for public diplomacy, to be the second-in-command to Karen P. Hughes in charge of repairing the United States' reputation, especially in the Muslim world.

But in what was to have been a routine meeting of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, the panel's ranking Democrat, objected to the approval of Ms. Powell, and her nomination was set aside. Several other nominations, including Zalmay Khalilzad's for ambassador to Iraq, were approved and sent to the Senate floor.

Democrats said Mr. Biden acted because the White House was trying to remove a major figure from the board that oversees American international broadcasting efforts, particularly the Arabic and Persian language radio and television networks aimed at countering the anti-American programming on Al Jazeera and other networks.

The board member is Norman J. Pattiz, a Los Angeles radio executive and Democratic contributor who was first appointed to the board by President Bill Clinton in 2000. His name was sent for reappointment by the Democratic leadership more than a year ago, but the White House has not forwarded it for approval. Mr. Pattiz has directed the start-up of the American networks in the Middle East, principally the television network Al Hurra and Radio Sawa....

Responding to Biden's move, Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, said the senator's action was "unfortunate" in light of the bipartisan support Ms. Powell had for the post....

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; arabic; biden; broadcasting; bush43; clinton; dinapowell; foreignrelations; iraq; jazeera; karenhughes; khalilzad; obstructionistdems; pattiz; persianlanguage; reid; term2; tomlinson

1 posted on 06/16/2005 6:02:35 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY
If the dems aren't obstructing they're not breathing.

How pathetic.

2 posted on 06/16/2005 6:05:26 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

children will be children..


3 posted on 06/16/2005 6:06:14 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (It's the borders stupid! (ours, not theirs!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

The "philosophy of the stop sign".


4 posted on 06/16/2005 6:08:41 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
Special thanks to Dewine, McCain and the other RINO's who made a 'gentlemans' agreement with fools.

The result of misplaced trust is the same result as stupidity. I think our RINO's weren't guilty of misplaced trust.

5 posted on 06/16/2005 6:16:36 AM PDT by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: OESY
The board member is Norman J. Pattiz, a Los Angeles radio executive and Democratic contributor who was first appointed to the board by President Bill Clinton in 2000.

Maybe they are not aware that they lost the last two presidential elections and don't get to hand out the government bonbons in this area anymore.

7 posted on 06/16/2005 6:34:35 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Another woman whacked by DUmbocRATs, because they can, how nice. Now what happens?


8 posted on 06/16/2005 7:11:10 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom2005
recess appointment or nuke em, this is getting old.

Agree. I think if a minority is going to block appointments, or make them take 6 months to go through after extracting a little flesh, then it's time to give the Senate a deadline. One or two months to approve, or they will be recess appointed. They appointment will last til the end of the Congress, and he can do it again in January 2007, en masse, for all of them. They will serve til 2009, and their title will be the same, so who gives a rats behind about the Senate? The business of the country needs to get done.

9 posted on 06/16/2005 8:27:18 AM PDT by Defiant (Democrats are the post-American party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Anyone who believes you can deal with these people is insane!

As the Democrats disgrace themselves daily... being propped up by a complicit, socialist media, the Republican Party argues among themselves on how to gain their approval.

It makes me SICK!

10 posted on 06/16/2005 8:58:17 AM PDT by johnny7 ('Mama T' has seen her husbands 'dishonorable discharge'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson