Posted on 06/17/2005 4:32:44 PM PDT by TFine80
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's top Republican energy bill negotiator, risking a break with the White House over the global warming issue, on Friday said the United States must act to curb heat-trapping greenhouse gases.
Pete Domenici of New Mexico, chairman of the Senate Energy Committee, "is convinced that the science now indicates that climate change is occurring and we need to do something about it," said his energy advisor Alex Flint. The stance is contrary to the Bush Administration's opposition to mandatory measures.
Domenici supports recommendations by the National Commission on Energy Policy (NCEP) for a mandatory cap-and-trade system starting in 2010, Flint said.
The system would set percentages by which U.S. utilities must cut emissions of greenhouse gasses blamed for global warming. Non-compliant parties would be able to buy financial rights to exceed their share of the carbon dioxide limits.
The senator's support could change the calculus for Senate action on climate change. The chamber is expected to debate several climate change amendments next week, including the mandatory limits vehemently opposed by the White House.
The NCEP plan -- similar to an amendment that Democratic Sen. Jeff Bingaman will offer to wide-sweeping energy legislation next week -- calls for U.S. utilities to cut the intensity of their greenhouse gas emissions by 2.4 percent a year starting in 2010. The percentage would rise to 2.8 percent starting in 2020.
"I think the (NCEP plan) is very much the middle ground on climate change right now," Flint said. "It may be the bipartisan consensus."
Domenici could co-sponsor Bingaman's amendment or some other version based on the NCEP plan, Flint said, adding that the senator has not yet made a firm decision.
The White House opposes mandatory carbon dioxide limits. President Bush in 2001 pulled the United States out of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, citing its economic cost.
Bush has called for industry to voluntarily cut its greenhouse emissions intensity by 18 percent by 2012.
Domenici has met with senior administration officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, to try to find a solution, Flint said.
Domenici "is very cautious ... about creating a fissure in the Republican caucus and with the administration," Flint said.
A White House spokeswoman declined to comment specifically on Domenici's statement, and said Bush's policy "is to reduce growth of greenhouse gas intensity consistent with a policy of economic growth and protection of American jobs."
Domenici will likely need White House support to resolve looming differences between energy bills favored by the House of Representatives and the Senate -- including liability for makers of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), Flint said.
An energy bill passed by the House in April protects makers of the water-polluting fuel additive from some liability lawsuits, but such measures are not expected to be included in the Senate version.
At least he's not pulling a McCain, and is trying to be a team player by finding a solution.
We can easily manipulate the level of water vapor in the atmosphere; it's just not economical to do so. Just because something isn't worth being done doesn't mean it can't be done.
If it's unclear, I responded to the above because my impression was that you're casting doubt on our ability to terraform Mars, based on our not having resolved the global warming issue for Earth. If that's the case, then even leaving aside the obvious logical fallacy your statement is wrong on its face. We know how to terraform Mars right now if we want to, it just requires the investment of resources to get it done.
Adding water vapor is a relatively straightforward exercise that could be done on Mars or on Earth if the reason and the will existed. Removing water vapor would be more dicey, but there's certainly no need to do that in order to terraform Mars...
We certainly can, from the technical standpoint, do some terraforming of Mars. No question of that. Whether we have the economic ability and political will to see it through is in doubt. Can you imagine terraforming being done on an annual budget basis with Congress apparently unable to dependably sustain the continuity of any program that lasts longer than a couple of years? Not to mention working with Europe, China, Russia, Japan, India, and whoever on any rational project at all.
Oh, I get what you're saying now. I totally misconstrued your above remarks. Sorry!
Heh.. We are in complete agreement. The simpering Euros are falling apart as we speak over trivialities, and I don't even want to get into our ridiculous congress critters..
I believe there is no other way to even begin colonization or settlement of outer space. Interested private industry would get it done.
The Land Office is necessary, not just a way to extend the reach of gov't. A necessary evil.
Excellent points!
Speaking of Mars, did you notice the other day, they reported that the Martian polar ice caps are receding the last few years...
Don't know if this suggests anything that might contribute to Earth's own temperature variations...
Henceforth I will always refer to Kyoto as the "ship-your-factory-to-China" treaty.
I am going to start investing in China funds. If we keep going down this road I'll be rich. I won't have a job, but I'll be rich, so who cares?
It might make a person wonder. Do we know as much as we think we do?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.