Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Magnitude 3.6 WESTERN KENTUCKY 2005 June 20 12:21:42 UTC
Advanced National Seismic System ^ | 2005 June 20 12:21:42 UTC | Advanced National Seismic System

Posted on 06/20/2005 8:05:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Recent Earthquake Activity in the USA

Magnitude 3.6 - WESTERN KENTUCKY
2005 June 20 12:21:42 UTC

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Cooperative New Madrid Seismic Network

A minor earthquake occurred at 12:21:42 (UTC) on Monday, June 20, 2005. The magnitude 3.6 event has been located in WESTERN KENTUCKY. The hypocentral depth was estimated to be 21 km (13 miles). (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)

Small globe showing earthquake

Small map showing earthquake

Magnitude 3.6
Date-Time Monday, June 20, 2005 at 12:21:42 (UTC)
= Coordinated Universal Time


Monday, June 20, 2005 at 7:21:42 AM
= local time at epicenter

Location 36.920°N, 89.000°W

Depth 21.1 km (13.1 miles)
Region

WESTERN KENTUCKY
Distances 4 km (3 miles) SW (231°) from Blandville, KY

5 km (3 miles) N (10°) from Bardwell, KY
9 km (6 miles) SE (124°) from Wickliffe, KY
37 km (23 miles) WSW (243°) from Paducah, KY
152 km (94 miles) WNW (286°) from Clarksville, TN
219 km (136 miles) SSE (150°) from St. Louis, MO

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.6 km (0.4 miles); depth +/- 1.7 km (1.1 miles)
Parameters Nst= 26, Nph= 26, Dmin=16 km, Rmss=0.27 sec, Gp= 83°,
M-type=moment magnitude (Mw), Version=D
Source

Cooperative New Madrid Seismic Network
Event ID nm747

Felt Reports Felt (IV) at Bardwell, Barlow, Cunningham, Fancy Farm, Hickory, Wickliffe and Wingo; (III) at Calvert City, Kevil, La Center, Mayfield, Paducah and West Paducah. Also felt (IV) at Cairo, Illinois and (III) at Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Felt in parts of Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri and Tennessee.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas; US: Illinois; US: Kentucky; US: Missouri; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: earthquake; newmadrid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

1 posted on 06/20/2005 8:05:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bd476

New Madrid quake....


2 posted on 06/20/2005 8:05:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; bd476

Well for Pete's sake. Kentucky???


3 posted on 06/20/2005 8:06:31 PM PDT by Brad's Gramma (Yo! Cowboy! I'm praying for a LoganMiracle! It CAN happen!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Heck, that is only a hick up. Hehehehe. You would have to be standing right on top of it to feel anything.


4 posted on 06/20/2005 8:06:39 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Damn!


5 posted on 06/20/2005 8:07:18 PM PDT by Old Sarge (In for a penny, in for a pound, saddlin' up and Baghdad-bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Yep:


6 posted on 06/20/2005 8:07:39 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Rumbler in Kentuckyfornia!


7 posted on 06/20/2005 8:07:49 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

That better not have damaged any bourbon distilleries!!! Maybe I should make a nighttime run on Basil Hayden & Knob Creek before the prices shoot up.


8 posted on 06/20/2005 8:08:26 PM PDT by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

They had a slightly larger one in May in that area.


9 posted on 06/20/2005 8:09:13 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AaronThompson; aCDNinUSA; AFMobster; alicewonders; all_american1; Amn. Seaman; anoldafvet; ...
BLUEGRASS PING
10 posted on 06/20/2005 8:09:25 PM PDT by RonPaulLives (Never trust anything ending in "u." For example, "DU," "EU," "I love you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Well, look at that!


11 posted on 06/20/2005 8:09:40 PM PDT by Brad's Gramma (Yo! Cowboy! I'm praying for a LoganMiracle! It CAN happen!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

That was this morning of course.


12 posted on 06/20/2005 8:10:19 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Deep, too.

Depth 21.1 km (13.1 miles)


13 posted on 06/20/2005 8:12:01 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

100 miles from FT Campbell!


14 posted on 06/20/2005 8:12:33 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Bump for later


15 posted on 06/20/2005 8:12:48 PM PDT by PilloryHillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Heck, that is only a hick up. Hehehehe. You would have to be standing right on top of it to feel anything.

EARTHQUAKES IN THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE

The New Madrid seismic zone of southeast Missouri and adjacent States is the most seismically active in North America east of the Rockies. During the winter of 1811-1812 three very large earthquakes devastated the area and were felt throughout most of the Nation. They occurred a few weeks apart on December 16, January 23, and February 7. Hundreds of aftershocks, some severely damaging by themselves, continued for years. Prehistoric earthquakes similar in size to those of 1811-1812 occurred in the middle 1400's and around 900 A.D. Strong, damaging earthquakes struck the southwestern end of the seismic zone near Marked Tree, Arkansas in 1843 (magnitude 6.3), and the northeastern end near Charleston, Missouri in 1895 (magnitude 6.6). Since 1900, moderately damaging earthquakes have struck the seismic zone every few decades. About twice a year people feel still smaller earthquakes that do not cause damage.

Earthquakes in the central and eastern U.S. are typically felt over a much broader region than in the western U.S. East of the Rockies, an earthquake can be felt over an area as much as ten times larger than a similar magnitude earthquake on the west coast. A magnitude 4.0 eastern U.S. earthquake typically can be felt at many places as far as 100 km (60 mi) from where it occurred, and it infrequently causes damage near its source. A magnitude 5.5 eastern U.S. earthquake usually can be felt as far as 500 km (300 mi) from where it occurred, and sometimes causes damage as far away as 40 km (25 mi).

FAULTS

Earthquakes everywhere occur on faults within bedrock, usually miles deep. The earthquakes of the New Madrid seismic zone occur within a large network of faults called the Reelfoot rift. The rift formed about 500 million years ago, when this region was stretched in the northwest-southeast direction. Along a northeast-southwest zone at least 70 km (40 mi) wide and 500 km (300 mi) long, the rocks in the rift were slowly dropped down about 1-2 km (1 mi) along some of the faults. Now the region is undergoing east- west shortening, and the ancient faults of the Reelfoot rift are being reactivated to generate earthquakes. Today the Reelfoot rift and the New Madrid seismic zone are 2,000 km (1,200 mi) from the nearest plate boundary, which is in the Caribbean Sea.

The network of faults in the seismic zone is buried beneath hundreds to thousands of feet of sand and mud. Four of the largest faults are recognized as alignments of abundant small earthquakes, and movements along two of these faults dammed rivers and created lakes during the earthquakes of 1811-1812. A few more deeply buried faults were detected during oil and gas exploration, and a few small faults are known from geologic mapping. However, many earthquakes occur away from the few known faults, so there must be additional, unknown faults that can generate earthquakes in the seismic zone. Accordingly, the best overall guide to seismic hazard in the New Madrid seismic zone is the earthquakes themselves.

16 posted on 06/20/2005 8:15:50 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Well for Pete's sake. Kentucky???

I know last week, Poland had one in the southwest region of their country.
17 posted on 06/20/2005 8:16:29 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - DeCAFTA-nate CAFTA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What with all of the seismic activity out west over the last two weeks, why, the conspiracy kooks and ecofascists will be in full catastrophe mode!


18 posted on 06/20/2005 8:17:17 PM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Recent Earthquake Activity in the USA

Update time = Tue Jun 21 3:00:02 UTC 2005

Here are the earthquakes in the US2/36.38.-90.-88 map area, most recent at the top.
(Some early events may be obscured by later ones.)
Click on the underlined portion of an earthquake record in the list below for more information.


 MAG    DATE     UTC-TIME    LAT     LON    DEPTH    LOCATION

        y/m/d     h:m:s      deg     deg     km
 3.6  2005/06/20 12:21:42  36.920  -89.000  21.1    4 km (  3 mi) SW  of Blandville, KY

 2.7  2005/06/20 02:00:32  36.920  -88.990  15.6    3 km (  2 mi) SW  of Blandville, KY
 2.0  2005/06/15 06:16:54  36.069  -89.474  11.1    9 km (  5 mi) WNW of Dyersburg, TN

19 posted on 06/20/2005 8:19:25 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma; Strategerist

See above, they are getting stronger.


20 posted on 06/20/2005 8:21:01 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider
What with all of the seismic activity out west over the last two weeks, why, the conspiracy kooks and ecofascists will be in full catastrophe mode!

Well, it's the apocalyptikooks that get the most jazzed.

In the grand scheme of things there really hasn't been all that much seismic activity in the world over the last two weeks.

It's just that prior to that seismic activity was really really really low, below average, in the couple months before those few weeks.

21 posted on 06/20/2005 8:21:12 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RonPaulLives; SLB

Thanks. :)


22 posted on 06/20/2005 8:22:31 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

If it disturbed the bourbon I'm gonna be pissed


23 posted on 06/20/2005 8:23:35 PM PDT by Vision (When Hillary Says She's Going To Put The Military On Our Borders...She Becomes Our Next President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

How do you adjust UTC time to CST time?


24 posted on 06/20/2005 8:23:58 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; All
New Madrid's "Big One" was expected to occur back in '90. I say "expected" because only one source, Browning, had predicted it. Very few, if any, real seismologists bought it, but the public did. Incidentally, some Jehovah's Witnesses, with their penchant for predicting the end of the world down to the minute, also fell for the rejected prophecy. Anybody remember that?

D.O.
25 posted on 06/20/2005 8:25:34 PM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
Sarge, New Madrid had a quake around 1811 that was the new nations largest. Estimated (best guess) 8.0.

3.6 wouldn't knock a little girl off stride in a hopscotch game. Still, temblors in the East worry the folks there.

26 posted on 06/20/2005 8:27:17 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

The FEMA folks I worked with while with DHS, always watched for anything related with New Madrid. It's the thing to do, for that sleeping monster.


27 posted on 06/20/2005 8:29:31 PM PDT by Old Sarge (In for a penny, in for a pound, saddlin' up and Baghdad-bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
It's just that prior to that seismic activity was really really really low, below average, in the couple months before those few weeks.

You'll recall that activity in California was quite active on an almost daily basis for several years from--don't quote me on this--the mid- to late-80's into the early 90's. At least that's the period that sticks out for me.
28 posted on 06/20/2005 8:29:39 PM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK; SmithL
AP story just posted:

Southern Appalachia sees spate of small earthquakes

29 posted on 06/20/2005 8:29:39 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

UTC is 6 hours ahead of CST.

5 hours Daylight time, I believe. 12:00 UTC is 6 am cST or 5 AM Central Daylight time


30 posted on 06/20/2005 8:30:14 PM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
Estimated (best guess) 8.0.

That would be the low end estimate. Estimates I have seen have been 8.8 to 9.0 - A huge difference.

31 posted on 06/20/2005 8:31:01 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
How do you adjust UTC time to CST time?

During Daylight savings it's GMT-6 hours; outside of Daylight Savings it's GMT-5 hours.

32 posted on 06/20/2005 8:31:32 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider
I say "expected" because only one source, Browning, had predicted it. Very few, if any, real seismologists bought it, but the public did.

No legitimate scientists bought it at all; Browning was essentially a kook; not a scrap of training in seismology or geology.

Like many bogus predictors, his crap prediction was based on lunar tidal forces. Sadly the media gave it a great deal of attention.

33 posted on 06/20/2005 8:34:15 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum; Strategerist

OK, thanks, so that would be 8 hours PST during Summer and 7 hours during winter....


34 posted on 06/20/2005 8:36:23 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It depends on what the meaning of time "is is "


35 posted on 06/20/2005 8:38:24 PM PDT by al baby (Father of the Beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
That would be the low end estimate. Estimates I have seen have been 8.8 to 9.0 - A huge difference.

Several recent papers have revised the magnitude estimates downward; basically no seismologists believe any of the three quakes were anywhere remotely close to Magnitude 9.

NEIC lists the largest of the New Madrid quakes at 8.1 now.

I've seen a few papers where some have it down in the high sevens; it MIGHT not have even been the largest quake in the lower 48, surpassed by either the 1857 or 1906 quakes in CA.

36 posted on 06/20/2005 8:38:49 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

The one in February of 1812 was close to MSn 9.0. Its predecessors ranged between 8 and 8.5.


37 posted on 06/20/2005 8:40:13 PM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
No Richter scale then....but I believe there was another scale that measured the amount of destruction and the reaction of the population to the event. I forget what it was called. But I do recall that the upper range (above an 8.0 on the Richter scale) caused mass panic.

The 1811 quake at New Madrid changed the course of the Big Muddy. I've no doubt it also caused mass panic.

The difference between 8.0 and (low ball) 8.8 is huge; I agree.

38 posted on 06/20/2005 8:49:07 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

We hicks in Ky have a fault all our own.

California is not the only place with faults.


39 posted on 06/20/2005 8:54:16 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: inkling

The distilleries are just fine.

They are mostly in the center of the state.


40 posted on 06/20/2005 8:55:08 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

In 1811 the area was sparsely populated. Today St. Louis and Memphis would receive damage from a big scale quake and St. Louis has no building codes concerning earthquakes.


41 posted on 06/20/2005 8:57:13 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

I read a good book not long ago about the New Madrid Fault.......fiction, but it scared the every living crap out of me.

8.0? I can't remember the exact title.


42 posted on 06/20/2005 8:59:12 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

New Madrid Fault was hyper active in 1811.

Quake cause the Mississippi River to flow north.

http://www.tuppenceworth.ie/biglife/quake.html

If this happened today , the loss of life would be staggering.


43 posted on 06/20/2005 9:02:27 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider
New Madrid's "Big One" was expected to occur back in '90. I say "expected" because only one source, Browning, had predicted it. Very few, if any, real seismologists bought it, but the public did. Incidentally, some Jehovah's Witnesses, with their penchant for predicting the end of the world down to the minute, also fell for the rejected prophecy. Anybody remember that?

Yep. They actually shut down schools that day, because too many people said they were going to keep their kids home. (My kids were planning on going that day.) I seem to recall that after the quake failed to materialize, Browning tried to change the date for his prediction, but this time fewer people paid an attention to him...

44 posted on 06/20/2005 9:11:19 PM PDT by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Point well made; It surprises me that St.Louis is geologically/historically obtuse. The fault isn't confined to New Madrid. Are we talking new construction too? Or just the existing stuff?

Just an aside; earthquake damage to structures varies. If you build on rock, you'll shake and lose all kinds of stuff that falls and breaks but the structure should survive. If you build on soil (floodplains, deep soil areas), the structure will be racked if not split up or collapsed. Seismic waves through deep soil areas are very destructive.

45 posted on 06/20/2005 9:23:40 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

LOL!!!



OK. Over & Out. :)


46 posted on 06/20/2005 9:28:19 PM PDT by Brad's Gramma (Yo! Cowboy! I'm praying for a LoganMiracle! It CAN happen!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

If you remember the name, will you let me know?


47 posted on 06/20/2005 9:28:57 PM PDT by Brad's Gramma (Yo! Cowboy! I'm praying for a LoganMiracle! It CAN happen!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Brad's Gramma
I read a good book not long ago about the New Madrid Fault.......fiction, but it scared the every living crap out of me.

Howlin...if you go to amazon.com and type in "New Madrid," there are a bunch of books that come up. If you recognize the one you read, can you let us know?

48 posted on 06/20/2005 9:33:23 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: paulat

Oh oh. You too? ;)


49 posted on 06/20/2005 9:34:58 PM PDT by Brad's Gramma (Yo! Cowboy! I'm praying for a LoganMiracle! It CAN happen!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Woooo doggies!


50 posted on 06/20/2005 9:38:11 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Mary Jo Kopechne needed an "exit strategy," senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson