Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Common virus kills cancer, study finds
Reuters ^ | 6/21/05

Posted on 06/21/2005 3:53:57 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

A common virus that is harmless to people can destroy cancerous cells in the body and might be developed into a new cancer therapy, U.S. researchers said on Tuesday.

The virus, called adeno-associated virus type 2, or AAV-2, infects an estimated 80 percent of the population.

"Our results suggest that adeno-associated virus type 2, which infects the majority of the population but has no known ill effects, kills multiple types of cancer cells yet has no effect on healthy cells," said Craig Meyers, a professor of microbiology and immunology at the Penn State College of Medicine in Pennsylvania.

"We believe that AAV-2 recognizes that the cancer cells are abnormal and destroys them. This suggests that AAV-2 has great potential to be developed as an anti-cancer agent," Meyers said in a statement.

He said at a meeting of the American Society for Virology that studies have shown women infected with AAV-2 who are also infected with a cancer-causing wart virus called HPV develop cervical cancer less frequently than uninfected women do.

AAV-2 is a small virus that cannot replicate itself without the help of another virus. But with the help of a second virus it kills cells.

For their study, Meyers and colleagues first infected a batch of human cells with HPV, some strains of which cause cervical cancer.

They then infected these cells and normal cells with AAV-2.

After six days, all the HPV-infected cells died.

The same thing happened with cervical, breast, prostate and squamous cell tumor cells.

All are cancers of the epithelial cells, which include skin cells and other cells that line the insides and outsides of organs.

"One of the most compelling findings is that AAV-2 appears to have no pathologic effects on healthy cells," Meyers said.

"So many cancer therapies are as poisonous to healthy cells as they are to cancer cells. A therapy that is able to distinguish between healthy and cancer cells could be less difficult to endure for those with cancer."

AAV-2 is being studied intensively as a gene therapy vector -- a virus modified to carry disease-correcting genes into the body. Gene therapy researchers favor it because it does not seem to cause disease or immune system reaction on its own.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2005; aav2; adenovirus; cancer; cancercures; cancertreatment; news; virus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Alright, I can continue my 4 pack a day habit!


21 posted on 06/22/2005 5:34:48 AM PDT by EdHallick ("KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!" - Capt. James T. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

This could have huge implications for HIV as well. Having already proven its effectiveness against HPV, HIV seems a logical follow-on candidate.

But then again, maybe the "V" in HIV has been a misnomer...

R3


22 posted on 06/22/2005 6:01:07 AM PDT by RedRightReturn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Luke

if you find anyway to get a hold of this virus to take it, please let me know.


23 posted on 06/22/2005 7:54:03 AM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I predict this will "go away" and never be heard about again. The ramifications of actually having a cancer "cure" are huge. The drug industry, the medical industry...huge hit. I don't think the gov't wants a cure, or there would already be one.


24 posted on 06/22/2005 7:58:00 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (WWW.TEACH-YOUR-KIDS.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I'm ALL Right!
I nominate your post for the Most Moronic Post of the Daytm

by this "logic", everything that can be discovered has already been discovered, and cures for all diseases already exist - thye've just been suppressed by the government-millitary-industrial-pharmeceutical complex!
25 posted on 06/22/2005 9:12:26 AM PDT by CzarChasm (My opinion. No charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RedRightReturn
This could have huge implications for HIV as well. Having already proven its effectiveness against HPV.

There is always hope. Viruses are such peculiar things, they could be keys to many revelations. That's something worth praying for, that our researchers find the keys.

26 posted on 06/22/2005 9:31:52 AM PDT by Lady Jag (Honor - Dignity - Courage - Loyalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A common virus that is harmless to people can destroy cancerous cells in the body

Wait until they find out it causes heart disease.

27 posted on 06/22/2005 9:33:13 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CzarChasm

I disagree. The business of treating cancer is huge, and finding a cure would render a large portion of our drug/medical professionals/companies irrelevant. This would result in an enormous negative effect on the economy. My tin foil hat is firmly in place, whether you believe me moronic or not. The bottom line counts.


28 posted on 06/22/2005 9:40:42 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1
There are two types of cancer reasearch articles. One is a request for research dollars, and so is the other.

More like, one is a request for government research grants, and the other is hype to draw in private investment dollars.

29 posted on 06/22/2005 9:43:27 AM PDT by kevkrom (“It’s good to remember whom people turn to when they’re desperate — and it ain’t Kofi Annan.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; All

Sounds great.

But, let's keep in mind it was only a study of 8.

However, what I am waiting for is a gene therapy/drug therapy based on a unusal gene an Italian (I think) family has that essentially makes them immune to heart disease no matter what they do and eat.

It is amazing. I forgot what it is called, but we are still waiting for that to be made into a drug to virtually end completely the heart disease menace.


30 posted on 06/22/2005 10:06:17 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I'm ALL Right!

The cure would be a boon to the economy since every other country would need it, too.


31 posted on 06/22/2005 10:08:57 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Conservative4Life

ping


32 posted on 06/22/2005 10:12:11 AM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24
if you find anyway to get a hold of this virus to take it, please let me know.

Will do philsfan24. So far I have not come across anything on the internet. I see my oncologist next week and see what I can dig up there.

You may be interested in this, I am participating in a phase 3 double-blind study for a drug currently numbered U-2901 (trade name is Provigil or Modafinil). This study is conducted by Gulf Coast MBCCOP. This drug fights the effects of fatigue caused by various chemotherapy drugs. It has not been approved but it works!

I still have side-effects but now I feel like working in the garden and walking a mile daily. If you need further info contact me via private reply and I'll do the same with this virus study. Have a great day.

33 posted on 06/22/2005 10:48:10 AM PDT by Luke (CPO, USCG (Ret))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: I'm ALL Right!
I didn't say you were moronic, i said your post was moronic.

perhaps your tinfoil hat is on a little too tight - assuming your presmise is true, which i doubt, but assuming that it is true just for fun, how much bigger would be a market for cancer cures and preventatives - which many people would pay a premium for - as opposed to the current market for questionable treatments that don't cure?

Imagine the market value of a 'cancer vaccine', for example...
34 posted on 06/22/2005 12:30:33 PM PDT by CzarChasm (My opinion. No charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: I'm ALL Right!
Free enterprise will take over here. The first company who can market this, assuming it works, will be the largest company in their market. The fact that this has been made public will keep it from being suppressed by anyone. Hell, we FReepers know the name of the virus and what it may do. Now any person with the right skills can look into this.

If this is in fact a cure, it's out of the bottle and won't be easily put back in. If there is real promise to this expect a race to use this, not suppression.
35 posted on 06/22/2005 5:12:36 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kelly_2000

AAV-2 Ping!


36 posted on 06/22/2005 5:50:24 PM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

It is looking more and more like they will have highly effective treatments against many of the regular forms of cancer very soon.

And with the coming battle over Codex, we might not be able to get them even if it is little more than an ordinary weed or virus.

I'm still reading some real interesting stuff about Graviola, if it turns out it really works, but the drug companies sat on it because they couldn't synthesize it, it would be one of the greatest crimes humanity ever saw.


37 posted on 06/22/2005 5:56:30 PM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

interesting resource bump


38 posted on 06/22/2005 6:02:21 PM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Holy cow!


39 posted on 06/22/2005 6:03:28 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak

If upwards of 80% of the population has this virus, why is cancer found in such a high percentage of the population (higher than 20%)?


40 posted on 06/22/2005 6:37:55 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson